similar to: Writing proprietary application with Rails

Hi, I?m using samba rel.3.3.4. The domain group associated to the domain user is always 10000 that means ?Domain Users? for all the domain users $> getent passwd | grep pippo DOMAIN\pippo:*:10015:10000:PIPPO:/home/DOMAIN/pippo:/bin/false Do you know how is it possible to assign a different domain group ? How is it possible that winbindd intercepts another domain group instead of the default

Dear R users: I have some difficulties analizing data with mixed effects NLME and the last version of R. More concretely, I have a repeated measures design with a single group and 2 experimental factors (say A and B) and my interest is to compare additive and nonadditive models. suj rv A B 1 s1 4 a1 b1 2 s1 5 a1 b2 3 s1 7 a1 b3 4 s1 1 a2

I've recently switched from Courier-imap to dovecot and I'm impressed with it's speed and reliability. However, my index file gets regularly corrupted: Feb 8 21:23:16 hive imap(hart): Corrupted index file /home/hart/Maildir/.INBOX/.imap.index: index.next_uid (129) > uid_rec.uid (128) dovecot version: 0.99.13-3 Debian sid) I use dovecot in combination with mutt, procmail and

Hello: We have a Fedora Core 2 (FC2) server with Dovecot and Procmail. Versions are: dovecot-0.99.13-4.FC2 procmail-3.22-13 We use "maildir" below home directory like: /users/operaciones/epezoa/maildir, where "epezoa" is my account. If I receive an e-mail, is stored at "new" folder. When I try to get e-mail from server, message is transfered from

Hello !! _PRODUCTION ENV_ - I currently using 2 Win2K AD servers, 1 Win2012 File Server and about 100 pc on the same domain (domain A) _TEST__ENV_ - I just created 2 Linux Debian8 Samba4 AD servers with a different domain (domain B) and I'm using 1 pc (joined to the domain B) to test the new environment. My problem is to access from the new Samba environment (pc/users joined on domain

Hi, I have a pentium 4 with Intel motherboard and one TDM400P (2 fxs, 2fxo) modprobe zaptel is Ok but When I execute modprobe wctdm never load the module, I can wait for 1 year but never response me (error or OK). I need to do ctrl+c Any idea? Edgardo >>> jan@irial.com 06/21/05 10:07 AM >>> i know that there are extensive rework on the transfer in SIP at the moment. --On

Hi! How can I get older versions of R software? Thank you! -- *Rubiana Viana* Psic?loga e Mestra em Sociologia Pol?tica G?nero Ra?a e Direitos Humanos ? Pesquisa ? Projetos ? Cultura e Diversidade LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rubiana-viana/>| Portfolio <https://readymag.website/u2474224357/rubianaviana/> | Lattes <http://lattes.cnpq.br/1002116427542223>

That reminds me: Do the web documents reside in a repository somewhere or should I just grab them using wget? 2012/6/14 Michael Spencer <bigcheesegs at gmail.com> > On Wed, Jun 13, 2012 at 4:02 PM, Mikael Lyngvig <mikael at lyngvig.org> > wrote: > > If nobody else is doing it, I can translate the FAQ into Sphinx as I'd > like > > to begin gradually extending

On Wed, Jun 13, 2012 at 4:47 PM, Mikael Lyngvig <mikael at lyngvig.org> wrote: > That reminds me: Do the web documents reside in a repository somewhere or > should I just grab them using wget? The website is at http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project/www/trunk/ . The llvm docs are in llvm/docs. Which actually makes me wonder if the LLVM-project FAQ (in reference to Chandler's post in

Email Lists wrote: > -> Once the number three, being the third number, be > -> reached, then lobbest thou thy Holy Chicken of Antioch towards thy > foe, > > Ok... after much chasing around the yard and far too much clucking > baaaagokkkkk racket... I have the chicken!!! > > Still alive I might add. :-) > > Now, where in scripture do I find this again? :-)

Hehe, I intentionally left out the group because I just wanted to cheer you up and let you know that there's more than one "retard" on the list. 2012/6/14 Sean Silva <silvas at purdue.edu> > The irony of this reply is killing me :) > > > On Wed, Jun 13, 2012 at 7:54 PM, Mikael Lyngvig <mikael at lyngvig.org>wrote: > >> You're not alone :)

btw, the "default reply-to-all" extension for gmail works great! On Wed, Jun 13, 2012 at 8:11 PM, Mikael Lyngvig <mikael at lyngvig.org> wrote: > Hehe, I intentionally left out the group because I just wanted to cheer > you up and let you know that there's more than one "retard" on the list. > > > 2012/6/14 Sean Silva <silvas at purdue.edu> >

If nobody else is doing it, I can translate the FAQ into Sphinx as I'd like to begin gradually extending it so that it some day becomes more than just bare metal. I figure that extending the FAQ is one way to reduce the "noise" on the various mailing lists. Cheers, Mikael -- -- Love Thy Frog! -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL:

The irony of this reply is killing me :) On Wed, Jun 13, 2012 at 7:54 PM, Mikael Lyngvig <mikael at lyngvig.org> wrote: > You're not alone :) Don't let it bug you. > > I finally decided to install a GMail extension that enables reply-all for > all messages, because I kept forgetting. Perhaps you can find such an > extension or simply enable reply-all by default?

RC 2 is now available for testing (Early RC1 testing on a RedHat-based system with dynamic provider gateways uncovered a couple of debilitating defects in the enable/disable logic). Thank you for testing, -Tom -- Tom Eastep \ When I die, I want to go like my Grandfather who Shoreline, \ died peacefully in his sleep. Not screaming like Washington, USA \ all of the passengers in

RC 2 is now available for testing (Early RC1 testing on a RedHat-based system with dynamic provider gateways uncovered a couple of debilitating defects in the enable/disable logic). Thank you for testing, -Tom -- Tom Eastep \ When I die, I want to go like my Grandfather who Shoreline, \ died peacefully in his sleep. Not screaming like Washington, USA \ all of the passengers in

Hi, When I do a sip show peers in the cli, the status is lagged. This peer its behind a satellite link with 600/900ms of delay. May I change some parameter in the Asterisk? Some times I cant make a phone call from the remote site to my central site. Thanks Este mensaje ha sido analizado por C4I Mail Server en busca de virus y otros contenidos peligrosos, y se considera que esta limpio.

Hi, Just a brief follow-up on my link time issue: It was caused by excessive trashing; I tried rebuilding on a box with 8 gigs of RAM and observed the memory load while linking clang.exe: It peaked at 5 gigabytes memory, so now I've written this piece of info into the LLVM/Windows document that I posted earlier (I have already made a substantial number of corrections in the document). All in

Hello, I'm new to LLVM and I had a question about it: when we call the JIT::runFunction, since llvm doesn't has a full FFI, there are some cases in which the JIT needs to codegen a stub function to call the function we are interested, my question is: this stub function will remains in the module until when ? What are the most efficient way to remove it from the module and memory ? For a

On Wed, Jun 13, 2012 at 4:02 PM, Mikael Lyngvig <mikael at lyngvig.org> wrote: > If nobody else is doing it, I can translate the FAQ into Sphinx as I'd like > to begin gradually extending it so that it some day becomes more than just > bare metal.  I figure that extending the FAQ is one way to reduce the > "noise" on the various mailing lists. > > > Cheers,