similar to: [PATCH] Xenoprof passive domain support

These patches address issues in the kernel part of xenoprof: * Ill-advised use of on_each_cpu() can lead to sleep with interrupts disabled. * Race conditions in active_domains code. * Cleanup of active_domains code. Comments welcome. _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel

I''m looking into getting Xenoprof to tun in an HVM domain, since we will eventually need a profiler for HVM domains to track down areas of poor performance. (HVMs have poor performance? :) ) Being relatively new to OProfile, Xenoprof, and Xen internals, I would appreciate any pointers, tips, and comments on how to work the implementation. I see three basic areas of work. 1. Implement

Xiaowei, I''m puzzled by the following bit of code in p4_check_ctrs():        if (guest_kernel_mode(current, regs))                 mode = 1;         else if (ring_0(regs))                 mode = 2; If I look at the definition for guest_kernel_mode() it is: include/asm-x86/x86_64/regs.h: #define guest_kernel_mode(v, r)   \     (ring_3(r) && ((v)->arch.flags &

Renato, When I tried running "opcontrol --start" (after previously running "opcontrol --start-daemon") in dom0, I get this error message: /usr/local/bin/opcontrol: line 1639: echo: write error: Operation not permitted and this message in the Xen console: (XEN) xenoprof: operation 9 failed for dom 0 (status : -1) It looks like opcontrol is trying to do this: echo 1 >

Renato, When I tried running "opcontrol --start" (after previously running "opcontrol --start-daemon") in dom0, I get this error message: /usr/local/bin/opcontrol: line 1639: echo: write error: Operation not permitted and this message in the Xen console: (XEN) xenoprof: operation 9 failed for dom 0 (status : -1) It looks like opcontrol is trying to do this: echo 1 >

I am rebasing Fedora rawhide oprofile package to oprofile-0.9.7. The xenoprof patches on http://xenoprof.sourceforge.net/#download look a bit dated. The newest version is for oprofile-0.9.5. I massaged the patch oprofile-0.9.5-xen.patch to apply to oprofile-.0.9.7. Attached is that updated patch. Does this look reasonable? Is there a desire to get this into upstream oprofile? Or should the

Hi All. I''m trying to use xenoprof in my Xeon machine with PVOPS (3.1.0 kernel) & xen 4.1.1. In the past, I had failed to use the xenoprof in this environment. (1 year ago) While baremetal booting shows the counter object in /dev/oprofile/0 (or 1,2,3) , booting with xen fails to create those objects. Of course, opcontrol command doesn''t work. It only prints

my system configuration xen 3.4.2, oprofile 0.9.5( xenoprof patched ), dom0( jeremy''s pvops kernel 2.6.31.6 - patched dullor''s xenoprof patch ), domU( vanilla kernel 2.6.32 with paravirt enabled ), distribution( ubuntu 9.10 ) In passive mode, xenoprof seems to work well, opreport showed good information. but, in active mode, it seems not to be done correctly. my command is

Renato, If one creates an HVM domain (say domain 1) and then does echo 1 > /dev/oprofile/passive_domains one then gets the following on the Xen serial console: (XEN) xenoprof.c:143:d0 xenoprof/x86 with autotranslated mode enabledisn''t supported yet (XEN) xenoprof.c:143:d0 xenoprof/x86 with autotranslated mode enabledisn''t supported yet (XEN) xenoprof.c:143:d0

Keir, The following 3 patches allow HVM (SVM and VT) guests to be passively profiled using the very latest patches from Renato. These patches apply to 11470. Renato''s patches: http://xenoprof/sourceforge.net oprofile-0.9.1-xen-r2.patch And also a patch not posted FAIK (oprofile-0.9.1-fix-hvm-addr-overlap.patch) which is in the attached tar.bz2 file. hvm_xenoprofile_1.patch - The first

Hi, I want to use xenoprof to profile the overhead of the hypervisor. I patched the oprofile-0.9.5 using the patch from xenoprof.sourceforge.net Debian GNU/Linux 5.0 (lenny) Xen-4.0.1 + 2.6.32.27 (linux-2.6-pvops.git) Dom0 My platform is Intel(R) Core(TM) i7 CPU 960 @ 3.20GHz My problems are: In Dom0, But hardware performance counters don''t be mounted after initialization

Hi, I want to use xenoprof to profile the overhead of the hypervisor. I patched the oprofile-0.9.5 using the patch from xenoprof.sourceforge.net Debian GNU/Linux 5.0 (lenny) Xen-4.0.1 + 2.6.32.27 (linux-2.6-pvops.git) Dom0 My platform is Intel(R) Core(TM) i7 CPU 960 @ 3.20GHz My problems are: In Dom0, But hardware performance counters don''t be mounted after initialization

Hi I am using oprofile 0.9.3 on xen cs 16540 on an Intel system. When I look at the top "hot" functions, I see p2m_change_type being one of the top function in xen-syms. This function is only in the svm (AMD) code and should not appear on an Intel system. I see that this function is not being clled at all when I am running my apps as I have put printk in the functions and they do

Hi , I am getting following error when i try to run xenoprof /usr/local/bin/opcontrol: line 1082: echo: write error: Invalid argument Using 2.6+ OProfile kernel interface. Reading module info. Using log file /var/lib/oprofile/oprofiled.log Daemon started. what is this write error ? Any help is really appreciated. -John _______________________________________________ Xen-users mailing list

Hi , I am getting following error when i try to run xenoprof /usr/local/bin/opcontrol: line 1082: echo: write error: Invalid argument Using 2.6+ OProfile kernel interface. Reading module info. Using log file /var/lib/oprofile/oprofiled.log Daemon started. what is this write error ? Any help is really appreciated. -John _______________________________________________ Xen-users mailing list

See below... ---------- Forwarded Message ---------- Subject: RE: [Xen-devel] xenoprof passive profiling and "mode" setting Date: Wednesday 05 July 2006 21:53 From: "Yang, Xiaowei" <xiaowei.yang@intel.com> To: "Keir Fraser" <Keir.Fraser@cl.cam.ac.uk>, "Ray Bryant" <raybry@mpdtxmail.amd.com> Cc: xen-devel@lists.xensource.com

Hi, Keir, Currently, HVM guests do not have access to performance counters. So it is not possible to use performance analyzer software such as vtune in HVM guest to analyze programme performance. Other usage of performance counters , for example, the NMI watchdog, won''t function either. This patch will enable performance counters in HVM guest. Currently, only Core 2 Duo is implemented.

An embedded and charset-unspecified text was scrubbed... Name: cpumask:convert-drivers.patch Url: http://lists.linux-foundation.org/pipermail/virtualization/attachments/20090107/f459eb35/attachment.txt

An embedded and charset-unspecified text was scrubbed... Name: cpumask:convert-drivers.patch Url: http://lists.linux-foundation.org/pipermail/virtualization/attachments/20090107/f459eb35/attachment.txt