similar to: [patch] call out to arch code to deliver timer interrupts

While digging through the time code, I found something very strange in do_settime: x = (secs * 1000000000ULL) + (u64)nsecs - system_time_base; y = do_div(x, 1000000000); spin_lock(&wc_lock); wc_sec = _wc_sec = (u32)x; wc_nsec = _wc_nsec = (u32)y; spin_unlock(&wc_lock); The value "x" appears to be the number of nanoseconds, while the value

Enable cpufreq support in Xen for AMD Operton processors by: 1) Allowing the PowerNow! driver in dom0 to write to the PowerNow! MSRs. 2) Adding the cpufreq notifier chain to time-xen.c in dom0. On a frequency change, a platform hypercall is performed to scale the frequency multiplier in the hypervisor. 3) Adding a platform hypercall to the hypervisor the scale the frequency multiplier and reset

On 19 Jun 2013, at 13:34, Roger Pau Monné <roger.pau@citrix.com> wrote: > > Could you provide the boot log of the DomU, backtrace, Xen version and > Dom0 kernel version? I did not have a console attached when it rebooted, so I did not have a log of the initial boot. Now that I did, I see that it fails to mount its root volume. It had been running previously on pvhvm_v10 for about

Add suspend/resume to devices owned by Xen. Signed-off-by Ke Yu <ke.yu@intel.com> Signed-off-by Kevin Tian <kevin.tian@intel.com> diff -r 3ef0510e44d0 xen/arch/x86/apic.c --- a/xen/arch/x86/apic.c Tue May 08 10:21:23 2007 +0100 +++ b/xen/arch/x86/apic.c Mon May 14 15:05:28 2007 -0400 @@ -579,6 +579,95 @@ void __devinit setup_local_APIC(void) apic_pm_activate(); } +static

I''ve been looking into bug [1]#195 and I have a couple of questions on how timer interrupts and virqs are handled. Is it possible for dom0 linux to irq balance timer interrupts to different cpus? That is, if xen sends a VIRQ_TIMER to vcpu0, backed by cpu0, is it possible for that interrupt to be handled by vcpu1, backed by cpu1 ? After putting in some debug code in to timer_interrupt

Hi, I have done some debugging to find out the root cause of bug 1282, which has the following symptoms with paravirtualized guests: - after a live migrate, the time on the guest can jump - after a live migrate, the guest "forgets" to wake up processes - after a domU save, dom0 reboot and domU restore, the time is correct but processes are not woken up from sys_nanosleep The problem

Enable cpufreq support in Xen for AMD Operton processors by: 1) Allowing the PowerNow! driver in dom0 to write to the PowerNow! MSRs. 2) Adding the cpufreq notifier chain to time-xen.c in dom0. On a frequency change, a platform hypercall is performed to scale the frequency multiplier in the hypervisor. 3) Adding a platform hypercall to the hypervisor the scale the frequency multiplier and reset

Hi, kdb: to debug xen hypervisor, could also debug guests gdbsx: to debug PV/HVM linux guests The tree is : http://xenbits.xensource.com/ext/debuggers.hg See README-dbg. You''ll need to setup serial access for kdb. Thanks, Mukesh > > Hi Dan, > > I''m currently using your version of ssplitd as it is. I haven''t tried > kdb. For some reason I

Hello, The Xen community is working on a new virtualization mode (or maybe I should say an extension of HVM) to be able to run PV guests inside HVM containers without requiring a device-model (Qemu). One of the advantages of this new virtualization mode is that now it is much more easier to port guests to run under it (as compared to pure PV guests). Given that FreeBSD already supports

This set of patches adds the support for acceleration plugins to the netfront/netback drivers. These plugins are intended to support virtualisable network hardware that can be directly accessed from the guest, bypassing dom0. This is in response to the RFC we posted to xen-devel with an outline of our approach at the end of September. To follow will be another set of patches to provide our