similar to: [PATCH] safer checks in network-bridge script

I have the following networking setup: - eth0 and eth1 corresponding to the physical ports on the host NIC - bond0 which enslaves eth0 + eth1 - br0 which attaches bond0 - xenbr0 - xenbr5 all of which are internal only networks (10.0.0.0; 10.1.1.0; etc) Br0 is used both for the host to access the outside world as well as DomUs acting as gateway machines for each xenbr network. For example the

Hi I''m testing around with xen 3.0 snapshot from last week. And i''m now having a problem with a xenbr which is based on a vlan if (dot1q). this is all in dom0 os: debian testing network: tg3 I can start the bridge based on my normal physical eth0 which is working without any problems. My clan without bridge is also working. I can start the bridge based on a vlan if with help

I have a OpenSuse 10.3 with xen 3.1.0 running and it''s been running fine for a few months. This past weekend it suddenly started to act up and after some troubleshooting I can now say that it seems like the guests(domU) loose the outgoing network pipe, from the console I can see that the TX counter is stuck at the same value but it''s no errors. It behaves as if whatever I try to

The network-bridge script fails when setting a few sysctls which are only available if ebtables is present in the host kernel. Fix by ignoring the return value of the sysctl command. Signed-off-by: Avi Kivity <avi@qumranet.com> Index: xen/tools/examples/network-bridge =================================================================== --- xen/tools/examples/network-bridge (revision 991)

Hi Everyone, In my HVM guest''s config file, I have given my guest 3 interface. I have called them fw1, fw2 and fw3. I have joined each interface to a bridge on the Dom0. This does appear when I do a "brctl show". However, there are 3 other interfaces also added called tapx.0,tapx.1 and tapx.2 (Where x is the domain ID for the guest). Furthermore, I am only able to run

Hi all, First, i''m french and my english is approximately, thanks to be indulgent. I have 2 Xen server 4.0 on Debian Squeeze with this kernel : 2.6.32-5-xen-amd64. In my entreprise I have a multiple networks : - 1 : 10.168.30.0/24 - 2 : 10.168.40.0/22 - 3 : 10.168.50.0/22 - 4 : 10.168.60.0/22 - Admin : 10.168.0.0/20 - Internal : 172.16.8.0/24 On my 2 Xen server I have 6 bridges which

Hi, The attached patch fixes the setup of the bridge ports and the bridge itself. Changes: * move some functions to xen-network-common.sh, so both vif-bridge and network-bridge can use them. * add a new function to configure bridge ports and use it. * make sure arp requests, ipv6 autoconfiguration and ipv6 router solicitations are disabled for the bridge ports and also for the

Hello everybody, Here again with a Xenbr0 bridge problem I''m a Gentoo user, xen-sources-2.6.34 and I always used the bridge from eth0 to xenbr0. Here''s what I get at boot time: * Bringing up interface eth0 * null [...] * Starting Xen control daemon ... And the bridge doesn''t come up. The normal behaviour should be that the Xenbr0 bridge comes up automatically, but

Hi, We have configured several xen guest OSes on a server running SLES10. The physical server is a Sun 4200 with 3 NICs installed, configured, and working. Each of the xen guest OSes have three virtual nics, configured for RAC, Interconnect, and public IPs as follows; eth0 - public (routable and registered in DNS) eth1 - private (not routable, uses a seperate network subnet for

Hi list, kernel-xen-2.6.18-53.1.14.el5 and kernel-xen-2.6.18-53.1.19.el5 do not detect/initialize/whatever my eth1 network card any more. With kernel-xen-2.6.18-53.1.13.el5 everything is working as expected. With the two recent kernels I only get an Interface named __tmp786686833 which is not added to xenbr... lspci -v to the adapter in question says 02:00.0 Ethernet controller: Intel

Hallo, I have running xen-4.2/linux-3.8 (compiled) on any hosts. - dell pe r720: drac, eth0-3:igb squeeze -> boot_xen:ok net:ok bridge:ok - dell pe R620: drac=eth0, eth1-3:tg3 wheezy -> boot_xen:ok net:ok bridge:fail So i running "xend start" (or "xenbridges start") on my patient (R620 with broadcom tg3) network will be lost: RTNETLINK answers: File exists

Hello, I how an embedded processor that needs to act as a bridge between a wireless and wired network. I have managed to bring up the bridge fine. I can also bring up the bridge with a static ip address. However I can not figure out how to bring up the bridge with a dynamic ip address. Is it possible to for a bridge to get a dynamically assigned ip address? Oliver

Hi, We would like to use VLAN tagged packets to be sent/received by the guest VMs running on xen hypervisor. Does xen bridging support vlan tagged packets arriving on the physical nic from outside of the xen host to be passed through with the vlan tag to the vif of the guest with the guest VM receiving the tagged packet ? We have a xenbr configured with two interfaces - eth3 (physical

Package: xen-utils-common Version: 4.0.0-1 Severity: normal After upgrading xen-utils-common from 3.4.2-4 to 4.0.0-1, I could not create a guest domain defined with a DRBD file type. The xm create command would fail with "Error: Device 51713 (vbd) could not be connected. Hotplug scripts not working.". After some research I realized the /etc/xen/scripts/block-drbd helper script was

Santiago, I appreciate your offer. I'm not really a kernel hacker, however I do know C and I would be willing to try if you point me in the right direction. Here is my first attempt using Debian running on an UltraSPARC: debian{root}:/root<512>strace -f -F -v brctl addbr br0 execve("/usr/sbin/brctl", ["brctl", "addbr", "br0"], [/* 16 vars */]) =

So, I'm setting up my first bridge, and I'm running into an interesting issue. I have a 4 port NIC (formerly 4 seperate /29 and /28 LANs) and an onboard NIC (to my ISP). I've setup the bridge using the script included at the bottom of this email (modified from Gentoo for Aurora). When the WET11 (the WET11 is a simple ethernet to wireless bridge) is unplugged, the bridge works

Hi, I've been encountering some problems with bridging under linux 2.6.12-9 (ubuntu Breezy Badger). Apologies for the newbie-ish email: problem is likely a config issues, but docs appear to be sparse and I can't find much reference to the problem/solution on the 'net; trial and error really isn't working... Am attempting to bridge an offsite network to the central

Hi there, I'm currently experiencing a minor problem using the bridge module under kernel 2.4.27 part of the Devil Linux distribution (http://www.devil-linux.org). The problem I am having is that when the bridge is unloaded during a reboot I receive the following errors in /var/log/messages: Nov 14 13:22:13 src@Devil kernel: unregister_netdevice: waiting for br0 to become free. Usage count =

dear all: I try to configure a bridge in my embedded linux. I had fininshed these operations below: 1) configure kernel, select the option "802.1d bridge" 2) compile bridge-utils 3) issue these commands: ifconfig eth0 0.0.0.0 ifconfig eth1 0.0.0.0 brctl addbr vb brctl addif vb eth0 brctl addif vb eth1 ifconfig vb 192.168.110.24 up

I am so out of my depth on this one, but I would welcome some help. I have the following network and did get it to work with m0n0wall (a BSD firewall) an option called "transparent bridge". I've switched to Clark Connect because of its support for content filtering, and installed bridge-utils. I have a home network based a single WAN-facing NIC, eth0, that gets a public IP address