similar to: Xen hypervisor on SPARC v9

Hi Pawel, > We can not let it die and I volunteer to keep the Sparc alive! > > My SPARCstation pizzaboxes can be ready for action in a day or two. there are three sparc buildbots which are hooked up to lab.llvm.org. They are currently idle because no builders have been scheduled to use them: # gcc54 36G 0.5 GHz TI UltraSparc IIe (Hummingbird) / 1.5 GB RAM / Sun Netra T1 200 /

Chris, > FYI, I completely agree that we shouldn't remove the sparc target. However, it is currently unmaintained, and has some pretty glaring bugs. Is anyone interested in stepping up to maintain the target? > > -Chris We can not let it die and I volunteer to keep the Sparc alive! My SPARCstation pizzaboxes can be ready for action in a day or two. Pawel Wodnicki > On Oct

Greetings I want to remove numbers from a string of characters that identify sites so that I can merge two data frames. For example, a site in one frame is called "001a Frozen Niagara Entrance" whereas the same site in the other data frame is called "Frozen Niagara Entrance". It seems to me the easiest thing to do would be to remove the numbers from the first data

On Oct 31, 2008, at 1:10 PM, Luke Dalessandro wrote: > I've started trying by trying to get sparc-sun-solaris2.10 (niagara) > working. It appears that neither llvm nor llvm-gcc will build natively > on the system, so I think that I need to build an llvm-gcc cross > compiler. Get a gcc binary from someplace, use that to then build it, then install and use that, presto, done,

I am trying to do some research that involves instrumenting LLVM IR, that I need to test for performance and scalability on a bunch of systems. I've started trying by trying to get sparc-sun-solaris2.10 (niagara) working. It appears that neither llvm nor llvm-gcc will build natively on the system, so I think that I need to build an llvm-gcc cross compiler. The documentation for building

Hello zfs-discuss, I wonder if ZFS will be able to take any advantage of Niagara''s built-in crypto? -- Best regards, Robert Milkowski mailto:rmilkowski at task.gda.pl http://milek.blogspot.com

Hi all, If you're in Melbourne Australia and interested in Asterisk, you're invited to join us for a casual evening to talk about Asterisk, VOIP, networks, and just generally get geeky about IP phone stuff. Ultimately, I think it would be interesting and useful to turn this into a monthly get-together, so I'd like to talk about that too. Anyone with an interest is welcome; from

Mike Stump wrote: > On Oct 31, 2008, at 1:10 PM, Luke Dalessandro wrote: >> I've started trying by trying to get sparc-sun-solaris2.10 (niagara) >> working. It appears that neither llvm nor llvm-gcc will build natively >> on the system, so I think that I need to build an llvm-gcc cross >> compiler. > > Get a gcc binary from someplace, use that to then build

Author: girish Repository: /hg/zfs-crypto/gate Revision: 3559b6dca03e82b759e0deb84eab941bbe38b515 Log message: PSARC 2006/029 Hypervisor Versioning API FWARC 2006/052 sun4v version API update FWARC 2006/137 sun4v version CIF name change 6347011 enhance sun4v solaris to support versioning API 6306782 Backout check for unsupported Niagara 1.x processor Files: create:

Santiago, I appreciate your offer. I'm not really a kernel hacker, however I do know C and I would be willing to try if you point me in the right direction. Here is my first attempt using Debian running on an UltraSPARC: debian{root}:/root<512>strace -f -F -v brctl addbr br0 execve("/usr/sbin/brctl", ["brctl", "addbr", "br0"], [/* 16 vars */]) =

Hi, anyone have any experiences running Sun hardware (maybe a T1000 or 2000) with Ubuntu with Rails? Joe

Here http://llvm.org/docs/GettingStarted.html#requirements FreeBSD/amd64 isn't mentioned. It works quite fine for me. Also, it mentions that its known to work on Solaris/V9(Ultrasparc). Isn't this wrong since JIT isn't currently working on Sparc and is only expected to work with MC project completion? Sparc should me mentioned in the 'partial support' table. Also, I think

Hi: on a niagara platform, right after invokation of the plockstat(1M) for monitoring all events to a specific user-land process. It locks all monitored user-land processes pointer is very appreciated Thanks This message posted from opensolaris.org

Darn, and here I was thinking <small town> Melbourne, FL, USA =( _____ From: asterisk-users-bounces@lists.digium.com [mailto:asterisk-users-bounces@lists.digium.com] On Behalf Of jurgen Sent: Thursday, June 09, 2005 11:16 PM To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion; Commercial and Business-Oriented Asterisk Discussion Subject: [Asterisk-Users] Asterisk Evening in

Bryan J. Smith b.j.smith at ieee.org wrote: >Not only that, but people forget that SPARC is not sold by just Sun. >SPARC is an IEEE standard licensed under "fair and non-discriminatory" >terms. The SPARC ISA and most architectural details are freely >available. Yep - but what is your point with bringing that up? >The _majority_ of my Solaris/SPARC experience in more

HI All, I have acquired a Sun Fire VL 240. I know there is not a SPARC version of CentOS. Can anyone recommend a good OS for a machine that will do apache, postfix, mysql, etc. I know this is sort of a loaded question, but I don't have a lot of knowledge on distros that are stable on Sparc. -Jason

Invocation of randomForest() using the iris example in the help file crashes R with a segmentation fault. This happens on all of our ultraSPARC machines running Solaris 2.7. We're using R-1.4.1, compiled using Sun cc and f77 and the flags: CC=cc CFLAGS="-xO5 -xlibmil -dalign" FC=f77 FFLAGS="-xO5 -xlibmil -dalign" "make check" runs withour errors, and R has been

Hi, With the talk of speex possibly mis-behaving on PPC, I decided to check the big-endian architecture I have handy - the Ultrasparc. - playback of Intel platform .spx files appears fine on the Ultra 10. - encoding a .wav file and playing back on the Ultra 10 worked too. My evaluation is that it works the same on my Ultra 10 as it did on my Intel laptop. But I must say the evaluation was made

Hi: On niagara system, I am trying to resolve the Lock contention which results in low CPU usage. I have probed the Mutex hold event for heavy expensive lock releasing during user land processes test cycle. Any way to further investigate the call below is contributed by system library, user land process or kernel lock. This Mutex Hold: libsyssrv.so`__1cHSWMutexLmutexUnlock6M Thanks This

Hi, > but haven't had time (or machines) to do further development. I would > love to see someone add 64-bit ABI and JIT support. I don't know of And fix 32 bit ones :) Mostly byval stuff + FP arguments. -- With best regards, Anton Korobeynikov Faculty of Mathematics and Mechanics, Saint Petersburg State University