similar to: vif0.0/veth0 or eth0

Hi, I am using Xen 4.1.1 with Linux 3.0.1 kernel. Previously (Xen 3.4.4 and linux kernel 2.6.18) Xen by default created veth0 <--> vif0.0 pair in dom0. With Xen 4.1.1 these pairs are missing in dom0. Using command ''ip link add type veth'' I can create veth0 and veth1 but vif0.0 is still missing in dom0. (When new domU created I can see vif1.x created) Could you please help

Hi, I am using Xen 4.1.1 with Linux 3.0.1 kernel. Previously (Xen 3.4.4 and linux kernel 2.6.18) Xen by default created veth0 <--> vif0.0 pair in dom0. With Xen 4.1.1 these pairs are missing in dom0. Using command ''ip link add type veth'' I can create veth0 and veth1 but vif0.0 is still missing in dom0. (When new domU created I can see vif1.x created) Could you please help

nic@wuwei:/usr/src/xen/xen-unstable.hg$ sudo xm create breezy -c Using config file "/etc/xen/breezy". Started domain breezy Linux version 2.6.12-xenU (nic@wuwei) (gcc version 3.3.5 (Debian 1:3.3.5-13)) #3 SMP Thu Oct 13 14:56:20 NZDT 2005 kernel direct mapping tables upto 10000000 @ 568000-5ea000 Built 1 zonelists Kernel command line: root=/dev/sda1 ro 4 lockd.udpport=32768

I cannot boot domU: # xm create inhouse Using config file "inhouse". Started domain inhouse # xm list Name ID Mem(MiB) CPU VCPUs State Time(s) Domain-0 0 123 0 1 r----- 27.4 inhouse 8 2048 0 1 ------ 11.4 # xm console inhouse Linux version 2.6.12.6-xenU ( root@xen1) (gcc version 4.0.2 20050901 (prerelease)

Hello I use XEN 3.0 in debian sarge. I have a domU1 for routing and firewall. This domU1 use 2 network interfaces which is on a bridge ''gate'' and the other on bridge ''lan''. dumU2 use one interface (eth0) on bridge ''lan''. Then I make a ping out of domU2 to www.debian.de so I get no answer. The name isn''t resolved. A ping to IP of

We have a Xen 3.0 / Linux kernel 2.6.15 machine with the domU''s configured for shared /home directories. One of the domU''s is an NFS server, exporting /home, and the other domU''s all mount this. It all functions fine, but it''s pretty slow. I tried untarring a recent Linux kernel tarball. On the NFS server domU this takes about 25 seconds. I didn''t

> Hi. what creates veth0 and vifu.0, when? what''s the > underlying architecture behind them? Just trying to > understand the internals. netback/loopback.c creates them. It''s effectively a point to point link, allowing domain 0 to connect on to the bridge in the same manner that other domains do. (before, packets to domain 0 were short-cutted and came off the

Hi, I want to run a i386 domU on my AMD64. I created a LVM partition with Debian Sarge i386 on it, and set everything up. Now for the compilation of the kernel for i386. In "linux-2.6.12-xenU/" , make ARCH=xen menuconfig, i did: Processor Type (X86) (which was selected, and compiled with X86_64 before) Processor family (Opteron/Athlon64/Hammer/K8) [*] Generic x86 support if

Hi, I want to run a i386 domU on my AMD64. I created a LVM partition with Debian Sarge i386 on it, and set everything up. Now for the compilation of the kernel for i386. In "linux-2.6.12-xenU/" , make ARCH=xen menuconfig, i did: Processor Type (X86) (which was selected, and compiled with X86_64 before) Processor family (Opteron/Athlon64/Hammer/K8) [*] Generic x86 support if

Hi, Someone already use xen as production server? For example: 3 domains (mail, proxy and web server). And what about stability? Regards, Marlon _______________________________________________ Xen-users mailing list Xen-users@lists.xensource.com http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users

> That''s great, except when you need *two* bridges, for two > independent subnets, and there is no, as far as I can see, peth1. You can have multiple vethX interfaces on recent builds -- see netback/loopback.c. I think the current default is a rather miserly 1 (and should be increased), but can be set on the command line. Ian > Em Wednesday 14 September 2005 16:30, John

On 21/02/06, Bráulio Gergull <gergull@getnet.com.br> wrote: > Hi, > > I''ve had a similar problem. I found it to be due to crc checksum errors. > > I solved that with "ethtool -K ethN tx off" on all domU''s. > > I found some related info on the following thread: > > http://lists.xensource.com/archives/html/xen-users/2006-01/msg00088.html

Has anyone done any performance profiling for Xen on different platforms? I''m wondering if the big (50%+) memory latency advantage the Opteron''s have over the Xeon''s makes a big difference in the context of a Xen host with multiple active guest domains. Particularly at the moment I''m considering the 2-way situation with the SunFire v20z vs the Intel SR1400JR2.

I would like to run multiple copies of an application on a PC with multiple remote dumb clients. It would seem to me that running Xen would be a sub-optimal solution as I would need a copy of the OS running for every copy of the application, but I was wondering whether a subset of Xen or Xen techniques could be used. There are 2 barriers to running multiple applications with remote access: -

Hi list. I started with Xen yesterday, but I am facing a bit of a problem. My system had always configure eth0 with 10.0.0.4/8 I am using Xen unstable source (on Debian sid) Now I installed Xen, rebooted the machine, and first the usual network is coming up and then the xend will be started. I''ll end up with this, but I am wondering if this should be the way of things to be

Hi, I''m using Xen 3.0.3 on two servers with Debian Etch (amd64). These servers have 10 nics (2 onboard and 8 in two 4-port cards) so that every vm can have its own interface. This worked so far with the Xen Version from Etch with a wrapper script wich started 10 bridges at boot time. But now I''ve updated Xen on one of these server to Xen 3.2.0 from backports.org and now the

xenconsole fix. reference of tty->count in xencons_close() is racy. It must be protected by tty_sem semaphore like con_close() in drivers/char/vt.c -- yamahata _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel

Hi, I have a strange problem with my networking setup. I read all forums around the world where people had similar problems, but couldn''t find a solution. I have an Attansic L1 gigeth chip on my mainboard. This chip works OK in stock Ubuntu Gutsy (development) 2.6.22-9-generic kernel. When I boot into Xen, and after the bridge is created, the network stops working. Some info: - If I

Hi everyone. I am pretty new to xen, but am having an issue that I can''t seem to crack. I am running the 2-6-16 kernel on Debian Etch. If I boot into the Etch kernel, everything works as it should. When I boot into the Xen kernel, eth0 no longer exists. >From what I understand, the network-bridge script will down my eth0, create a new virtual eth0 and bridge it into xenbr0

Hello, Since my last update of xen, I am having problems with bridges and xen. When I want to start a bridge on the dom0 (to run a domU in a different vlan than the default) I run /etc/xen/scripts/network-bridge start netdev=eth0.302 bridge=xen-br302 antispoof=no where eth0.302 is an interface associated with my vlan 302 (it tags with this vlan identifier). The problem I have is that it