similar to: I need help in ActiveRecord..

Perhaps I should create a table row to hold an array of category ID''s? There''s probably an easy standard way of doing this in RoR and I just can''t wrap my brain around a practical way to do this right off. Specifically... I have a table that contains my product category names and another table that contains my actual product names with other product specific

Hi, Apologies for reposting this for those who read this via ruby-forum, but it didn''t make it to the list before, and the list seems more active... I''m using ferret (via acts_as_ferret) in a somewhat unorthodox manner and am having a strange wildcard problem. Before anyone wonders why we''re doing things this way, the answer is basically that it lets us

I''m trying to do a find that includes a join. It has to be a find because I''m using the results for a Pagination, so I need to limit my query to the number of results I want to display per page. Here''s the type of thing I want to do: Employee table <-> Skills_Employees table <-> Skills table Let''s say I want to find all the employees who have

if I have the following in my routes.rb: map.resources :product_categories it provides urls such as: /product_categories /product_categories/1 /product_categories/1;edit etc. and uses the ProductCategories controller. how can I keep the same controller (and model) but set up the resources so that I can have any abitrary url point to the existing controller, much like specifying the controller

I need response page in txt not in HTML. How I can response information in txt? Thank''s Bruno -- Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.

Hello, all I have one string in my controller but i need to knwon how i verify if it is numerical Thanks... -- Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.

Hi.. Guys new plugin again Foreign Key Associations is a plugin that automatically creates associations based on foreign-keys. The associations are created at runtime-ie. as your ActiveRecord models are loaded-so they will always be up-to-date. For example, given a foreign-key from a customer_id column in an orders table to an id column in a customers table, the plugin creates:

I''m studying the Agile Development with Rails book. In the chapter that first sets up the depot application (page 68), there is this bit of code from a view: <% for product in @products %> <tr> <% for column in Product.content_columns %> <td><%=h product.send(column.name) %></td> <% end %> etc... I am trying to absorb both Ruby and

I have a new problem: Register RBP is used in a function foo. (I am not allocating RBP to any virtual register, the instances of RBP in function foo are in the machine code when my register allocator starts.) Function foo calls function bar. Register RBP is not saved across the call, though it is live after the call. Function bar includes a virtual register. The code that I'm using to

I have an ActiveRecord class that has several has_many,belongs_to, habtm, and the new has_many => :through relationships. Whenever I try a find(:all, :conditions => "some conds", :include [:relationship]) it works fine, but if I have find(:all, :conditions => "some conds", :include [:relationship, :other_relation]) it gets a sql error such as Mysql::Error: You

Hi, new to RoR I am probably going to embarrass myself now: I have models organised in subdirectories, i.e. models |--material |--product.rb |--cross-applications |--currency.rb When I try to reference another model within the same subdirectory, everything works fine, i.e. belongs_to :product_categories, :class_name => ''Material::ProductCategory"

On 11/30/2012 6:36 PM, Lang Hames wrote: > > > RBP is used as the frame pointer on x86 (hence its automatic > appearance in your code), and shouldn't be allocated to any vreg in > function bar. Loading/saving RBP should be managed by the stack frame > setup/teardown code. > If it doesn't already, your allocator should filter out reserved > registers (See

map.category ''product_category/:page/path/:path'', :controller => ''product_category'', :action => ''show'', :requirements => {:path => /.+/, :page=>/\d+/}, :page =>1 warning is "Route segment ":page" cannot be optional because it precedes a required segment. This segment will be

First, I _do_ believe Samba is better than sliced bread (hey - you can't get fat by using too much Samba :), and I have enormous admiration and gratitude for the Samba Team. (Okay, no, I haven't sent any pizza vouchers...) But, I've got a problem (what else is new?) Win 95 clients in our public labs/classrooms are experiencing failed logins for good accounts and occasional failures