similar to: ANNOUNCE: Xen 3.1.1 First Release Candidate

Hello ! Just a quick question about time synchronization between xen dom0 and domUs... We''re running Xen 3.1 64-bit, with 32 and 64 bits linux guests. It''s up since 89 days and the domU''s time is around 5 minutes behind the dom0, which is updated via ntpdate... Any idea why it doesn''t sync the guests even that /proc/sys/xen/independent_wallclock is 0 ?

Hi, Maybe it''s a dumb question, but I''m actually trying to understand how the memory allocation works within Xen. I try to give 128MB to a domU and see if it increases for example when I "nano" a 500mb file, but the process just get killed when it reachs the 128MB memory limit. How do I configure the guests so they can ask for more memory until a limit is reached

You''re right scout the last line. Out looks like xapi is waiting on tapdisk to plug a key into xenstore. Perhaps a udev rule problem? Perhaps someone who knows more about tapdisk than I well be able to diagnose this tomorrow. Mike Sent from Samsung tablet Sébastien RICCIO <sr@swisscenter.com> wrote: Of course, here it is attached. Last line seems interesting. However tapdisk2

Hello Dovecot, As the new ubuntu LTS 20.04 seems to be out, I would like to ask if there are any plans to add a repo like it already exists for 18.04 LTS. We planned to upgrade our 18.04 LTS boxes to 20.04. It has it?s own dovecot packages (2.3.7 at the time of writing this), but I would prefer we use your repositories like we do with 18.04. Kind regards, S?bastien -------------- next part

Hi, I am in the process of upgrading some xen installations from 3.x to 4.1.1 and got into this: box# xl create vm1.cfg warning: Config file looks like it contains Python code. warning: Arbitrary Python is no longer supported. warning: See http://wiki.xen.org/xenwiki/PythonInXlConfig Failed to parse config file: Invalid argument I''m using python stuff to define vifs and disks

Hi, I''m currently trying to install xapi on debian (unstable), following the following wiki page: http://wiki.xensource.com/xenwiki/XAPI_on_debian 1. Install squeeze 32-bits (it''s not specified on the wiki, but I guess it wont work with 64-bit as the xapi *.deb files are for 32). note: you must leave an unused 1mb partition somewhere when creating your

As of Visual Studio 2015, natvis files can be included as part of individual projects <http://blogs.msdn.com/b/vcblog/archive/2015/09/28/debug-visualizers-in-visual-c-2015.aspx>, a much better method than manually copying the file to an specific directory in %USERPROFILE%. I think it should be included in one of the CMakeLists.txt files, does anybody know how I can add it? Sincerely,

How can I platform-conditionally compile/check sections of code with lit? Can I rely on preprocessor defines like _WIN32? Specifically, I'm adding new tests to existing lit tests, but the new tests should only be compiled and run on Windows. Sincerely, Alexander Riccio -- "Change the world or go home." about.me/ariccio <http://about.me/ariccio> If left to my own devices, I

While investigating compile times, I noticed that there's no information in the LLVM coding standards about code in headers. Many LLVM/Clang headers have lots of complex code in headers - I'm specifically looking at the Static Analyzer projects (seemingly slowest compile times, biggest hinderance to my productivity) - that probably doesn't need to be there. Nobody likes slow compile

That makes sense. Someone should stick it in the coding standards? it's just thankless work Absolutely, but since slow compile times (can) nuke my productivity, I may move some code out of headers. Sincerely, Alexander Riccio -- "Change the world or go home." about.me/ariccio <http://about.me/ariccio> If left to my own devices, I will build more. ⁂ On Wed, Feb 10, 2016

llvm::sys::fs::make_absolute converts its first parameter (const Twine &current_directory) to StringRef p(path.data(), path.size()), and then passes that StringRef to several functions (path::has_root_directory, path::has_root_name, and path::append) that accept Twines as parameters. Since llvm::StringRef can implicitly convert to an llvm::Twine, p converts to a bunch of Twine temporaries. In

hello, I''m running XEN 2.0 on IBM ThinkPad T23. Now the weird thing is that I get two different outputs from /sbin/lspci depending on whether I run 2.6.8.1-xen0 or 2.6.8.1-bproc. In particular the output from 2.6.8.1-xen0 seems to be missing those 4 lines 0000:00:01.0 PCI bridge: Intel Corp. 82830 830 Chipset AGP Bridge (rev 02) 0000:00:1e.0 PCI bridge: Intel Corp. 82801BAM/CAM PCI

Keir, I noticed that a Shadow patch went into the 3.1.1 staging tree today. Does this mean that we should expect a 4th release candidate before the 3.1.1 release tag is official? If so - how much testing time are you going to give that release candidate before deciding whether a release tag, or another RC round is appropriate? Ben Guthro _______________________________________________

> On Feb 10, 2016, at 7:34 PM, George Burgess IV via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > > > Someone should stick it in the coding standards? > > I'm happy to give this a shot. My 2c: I don’t think that we can agree to abstract code guidelines without knowing what it means in practice for the codebase. If you’re interested in this, please include a diff

I''m pleased to announce the availability of Xen 3.1.1 -- a bugfix release in the Xen 3.1 series. Many bugs, large and small, are fixed by this release and we recommend that all users and vendors upgrade. The source repository is available using mercurial from: http://xenbits.xensource.com/xen-3.1-testing.hg Binary packages have not yet been prepared for this release. Thanks to

I''m pleased to announce the availability of Xen 3.1.1 -- a bugfix release in the Xen 3.1 series. Many bugs, large and small, are fixed by this release and we recommend that all users and vendors upgrade. The source repository is available using mercurial from: http://xenbits.xensource.com/xen-3.1-testing.hg Binary packages have not yet been prepared for this release. Thanks to

Hello list, I am currently testing a setup for a PoC wit this configuration. - 1 x Frontend dovecot for proxying IMAP/POP3/LMTP/ManageSieve/Submission - 2 x Backend dovecot with local mail storage The frontend does the user authentification and communicate with the backends using a master password The fronted accepts PLAIN and LOGIN auth mechanisms and talk with backends using PLAIN auth

Hi, I''m currently trying xen 4.1.1 with the 3.0.0-rc5 (heard that it now contains the xen code to run as front or back xen domain). Everything seems to run fine, except that I am trying since a few hours to mount a .vhd file in the dom0. What I tried so far: to create a blank vhd file (this is working): host# vhd-util create -n /storage/test.vhd -s 20G Then i try to mount the file

> On 12/05/2020 07:48 S?bastien Riccio <sriccio at openbusiness.com> wrote: > > > Hello Dovecot, > As the new ubuntu LTS 20.04 seems to be out, I would like to ask if there are any plans to add a repo like it already exists for 18.04 LTS. > We planned to upgrade our 18.04 LTS boxes to 20.04. It has it?s own dovecot packages (2.3.7 at the time of writing this), but I would

''xm block-attach'' doesn''t let me assign the same backend device anymore, even if I use ''r!'' or ''w!''. I think this has changed since 3.1.1 (or maybe since 3.1.0). Is this the way it is supposed to work? Thanks James _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com