similar to: [PATCH][TOOLS]C/S 14864 requies xgettext - so check for it.

Hi koonz I noticed that you are using the cdrom parameter in the config file I believe that''s no longer used in recent versions of Xen. I am running debian etch here atm and am trying to virtualize windows guests aswell I am able to boot up windows with the following configs although they do tend to hang at some point during the installation. ----- Config windows xp ----- import os,

Thanks you all guys. I am able to create the RHEL5 PVM on RHEL5 host successfully. Only thing that i need to add is /mnt/etc/fstab in inintrd command and preload to both the fronthend drivers. As blow. # mount /home/disk /mnt # mkinirtd /boot//boot/initrd-2.6.18-8.el5xenU.img 2.6.18-8.el5xen --fstab /mnt/ etc/fstab --with xenblk --with xennet --preload xenblk --preload xennet Thanks a lot,

This avoids: xgettext: error while opening "libguestfs.pot-t" for reading: No such file or directory which I observed with xgettext (GNU gettext-tools) 0.18.3 --- po/Makefile.am | 1 + 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) diff --git a/po/Makefile.am b/po/Makefile.am index a8343ec..fd69441 100644 --- a/po/Makefile.am +++ b/po/Makefile.am @@ -67,6 +67,7 @@ XGETTEXT_ARGS = \

There is a phi-node "%phi = phi i64 [%cast1, %if], [%cast2, %else]" in the common successor. The actual control flow is a bit more complex, but there is a common successor block, and %cast1 and %cast2 are the two values that the phi node in the common successor takes. Does the existence of the phi node affect optimization? Thanks, Taewook From: <mats.o.petersson at

+cbieneman Mr. CMake might know how to fix it ;) Jon On 11/16/16 1:52 PM, mats petersson wrote: > Thanks, at least I know I'm not imagining or doing something really > daft! ;) > > My cmake skills are near 0%, so not sure I can fix, but perhaps I can > at least raise a bug? ;) > > -- > Mats > > On 16 November 2016 at 20:28, Martin J. O'Riordan >

I sometimes see this with a clean build and most often it is 'Attributes.inc' that is missing. I usually have to 'touch Attributes.td' for this. But I don't know CMake well enough to know how to fix these issue properly. MartinO -----Original Message----- From: llvm-dev [mailto:llvm-dev-bounces at lists.llvm.org] On Behalf Of Jonathan Roelofs via llvm-dev Sent: 16 November

Hi, My requirement is something like as given below, a.c => a.obj contains a1() and a2() function b.c => b.obj contains b1() and b2() function main.c => main.obj call to a1, a2, b1, b2 Now, I want to move a1(), a2() from a.obj to b2.obj and on top of function b1() When I call b1() from main, it should call first a1, a2 and then function definition of b1 Can you please give me some

When running test 5 in Memtest86+ v1.65, I got a "this opcode is not supported", so I decided to add it. It''s a compare operation, and it''s just the opposite of the already supported one (opcode 0x39), so it''s nothing spectacular. Why there''s a page-fault when this instruction gets executed, I haven''t got a clue, but I have a feeling that

> -----Original Message----- > From: Petersson, Mats [mailto:Mats.Petersson@amd.com] > Sent: Thursday, March 01, 2007 10:12 AM > To: Foreman, Tim > Cc: xen-users@lists.xensource.com > Subject: RE: [Xen-users] Xen 3.0.4 on RH EL 4.4 - can''t make it boot > kerne l > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Foreman, Tim [mailto:tforeman@ibsys.com]

Hi Mats, I think Kevin's point is malloc can return 0, if malloc/free pair is optimized way, the semantic of the original would be changed. On the other hand, malloc/free are special functions, but programmers can still define their own versions by not linking std library, so we must assume malloc/free always have side-effect like other common functions, unless we know we will link std

Thanks. I am just trying to find a relocation and linking design for Hexagon architecture, whether to follow the MIPS style of relocation or other architecture style of relocation. Thats my question . Thats why i was asking about the functions and their differences Please guide. Thanks, Siddharth On Fri, Apr 21, 2017 at 8:37 PM, mats petersson <mats at planetcatfish.com> wrote: > If

the packed + aligned attribute will automatically introduce explicit padding byte array: https://godbolt.org/g/TlHX2g Sometimes Clang will decide to automatically pack the struct/class in C++, I don't know the details here, but looks like it is related to inheritance. Thanks Hongbin On Thu, May 18, 2017 at 1:32 AM, mats petersson <mats at planetcatfish.com> wrote: > How do you

> -----Original Message----- > From: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com > [mailto:xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com] On Behalf Of > Gerd Hoffmann > Sent: 17 May 2006 07:43 > To: Petersson, Mats > Cc: xen-devel@lists.xensource.com; xen-changelog@lists.xensource.com > Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] RE: [Xen-changelog] Fix MOVS > instruction emulation for HVM MMIO. >

So, you need to bitcast `pinst` to a pointer to Vector of double, since it (I hope for your sake) is a pointer to integer. What you are trying to do is bitcast a pointer into a vector, which probably will lead to an assert or "bad code that doesn't work". -- Mats On 15 April 2015 at 21:57, zhi chen <zchenhn at gmail.com> wrote: > What I want to do is to change the pInst

Hi, Yes I am looking for IR pass that will do insert call of functions that defined in another file. Links/suggestions that guide me to start for adding IR pass will help me so much. Regards, Deepika On Wed, Feb 10, 2016 at 1:03 PM, mats petersson <mats at planetcatfish.com> wrote: > So how do you know what you want to modify (conceptually)? > > Have you got a IR pass that you

HI Mats, > On 22 Feb 2016, at 16:48, mats petersson <mats at planetcatfish.com> wrote: > > And you want this for only SOME bits of code, and that's why you need to have the IR report what sections are "sensitive"? Exactly and I want to chose this once the compilation is over. > It would be fairly easy if the code you want to check is a normal functions, just

On 16/10/15 14:09, mats petersson wrote: > I think it's important to understand that this is not ALWAYS the case. > The operands can be either a constant expression or an instruction. > > For example: > > char *a; > int x; > > if(cond) a = "%d"; > else a = "%x"; > printf(a, x); > > In this case, the compiler

and by "right thing" i mean it can hoist if you want and it can prove it will not extend the live range. Note that VBE (very busy expressions) is a code size optimization only. It does not save time. On Tue, Feb 9, 2016 at 12:26 PM, Daniel Berlin <dberlin at dberlin.org> wrote: > This GVN does not do that, this is correct. It is a very simple GVN. All > phi nodes are

Thanks for reply, it was really helpful. Can u just be more specific and tell about processRelocationRef() and resolveRelocation() in Targets/RuntimeDyld(objectfile format)(arch).h and also in RuntimeDyldELF.cpp and how the same function is implemented in different ways in both the files ? Thanks, Siddharth On Thu, Apr 20, 2017 at 8:16 PM, mats petersson <mats at planetcatfish.com> wrote:

SVM patch to cleanup IOIO handling, do not use "real" mode but rather the correct "bitness". Applies cleanly to 10002. Please apply to xen-unstable.hg. Please apply to xen-3.0-testing.hg. Signed-off-by: Tom Woller <thomas.woller@amd.com> Signed-off-by: Mats Petersson <mats.petersson@amd.com> _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list