similar to: RE: Individual passwords for guest VNC servers ?

Using Ulrik?s example data (and assuming I understand what is wanted), here is what I would do: ex.dat <- c("FName: fname1", "Fval: Fval1.name1", "Fval: ", "FName: fname2", "Fval: Fval2.name2", "FName: fname3") tst <- data.frame(x = ex.dat, stringsAsFactors=FALSE) sp <- strsplit(tst$x, ':', fixed=TRUE) chk <-

@Don your solution does not solve Vijayan's scenario 2. I used spread and gather for that. An alternative solution to insert mising Fval - picking up with Don's newtst - is newtst <- c("FName: fname1", "Fval: Fval1.name1", "FName: fname2", "Fval: Fval2.name2", "FName: fname3", "FName: fname4", "Fval: fval4.fname4")

Hi, I am trying to find a simple way to numerically solve a system of two equations equal to zero with two unknowns (x_loc and y_loc). Here is a mock data set and below it, the equations I need to solve. theta<-c(180,135,90)/(2*pi) x<-c(0,0,15) y<-c(20,0,0) 0 = -sum((y_loc-y)*(sin(theta)*(x_loc-x)-cos(theta)*(y_loc-y))/(((x_loc-x)^2+(y_loc-y)^2)^0.5)^3) 0 =

Dear R-help Group Scenario 1: I have a text file running to 1000 of lines...that is like as follows: [922] "FieldName: Wk3PackSubMonth" [923] "FieldValue: Apr" [924] "FieldName: Wk3PackSubYear" [925] "FieldValue: 2017" [926] "FieldName: Wk3Code1" [927] "FieldValue: " [928] "FieldValue: K4" [929] "FieldName:

Hi r-users,   I have the following code to solve 4 simultaneous eqns with 4 unknowns using newton iteration method.  But I got the error message:   pars <- c(1.15, 40, 50, 0.78) newton.input2 <- function(pars) {  ## parameters to estimate      alp <- pars[1]    b1  <- pars[2]     b2  <- pars[3]    rho <- pars[4]   f1 <- pars[1]*pars[2] f2 <-

Hi Vijayan, one way going about it *could* be this: library(dplyr) library(tidyr) library(purrr) ex_dat <- c("FName: fname1", "Fval: Fval1.name1", "Fval: ", "FName: fname2", "Fval: Fval2.name2", "FName: fname3") data.frame(x = ex_dat) %>% separate(x, c("F1", "F2"), sep = ": ") %>% filter(F2

Hi R-users, Does R has a topic on newton's method? Thank you for the info.

Hi R-list, I am new to optimization in R and would appreciate help on the following question. I would like to minimize the following function using two constraints: ###### fn <- function(par,H,F){ fval <- 0.5 * t(par) %*% H %*% par + F%*% par fval } # matrix H is (n by k) # matrix F is (n by 1) # par is a (n by 1) set of weights # I need two constraints: # 1.

I think SANN method in optim() is failing to report that it has not converged. Here is an example genrose.f<- function(x, gs=NULL){ # objective function ## One generalization of the Rosenbrock banana valley function (n parameters) n <- length(x) if(is.null(gs)) { gs=100.0 } fval<-1.0 + sum (gs*(x[1:(n-1)]^2 - x[2:n])^2 + (x[2:n] - 1)^2) return(fval) }

Hi everyone, i?m a new user of R and i?m trying to translate an linear optimization problem from Matlab into r. The matlab code is as follow: options = optimset('Diagnostics','on'); [x fval exitflag] = linprog(f,A,b,Aeq,beq,lb,ub,[],options); exitflag fval x=round(x); Where: f = Linear objective function vector (vector of 45,rows) A = Matrix for linear inequality

I am attempting to lower the selectCC instruction to the instruction set of the backend I'm working on and I cannot seem to find a way to correctly implement this instruction. I know how this instruction should get implemented; I just have yet to find a way to do it. I want the select_cc instruction to be lowered into a comparison followed by a conditional move. I've attempted to use a

Hi, I'm trying to figure out how anova works in R by translating the examples in Sokal And Rohlf's (1995 3rd edition) Biometry. I've hit a snag with planned comparisons, their box 9.4 and section 9.6. It's a basic anova design: treatment <- factor(rep(c("control", "glucose", "fructose", "gluc+fruct",

> > > > The approach I was thinking would look something like this: > > * instead of Features, which is really a namespace implemented as a > class, we separate out the calculation of the different features > into distinct subclasses of Feature, whose only job is to calculate > a single feature. Currently the FeatureManager calls these (via >

I have a Master's student working on a project which involves estimating parameters of a certain model via maximum likelihood, with the maximization being done via optim(). A phenomenon has occurred which I am at a loss to explain. If we use certain pairs of starting values for optim(), it simply returns those values as the ``optimal'' values, although they are definitely not

On Thu, Sep 11, 2008 at 6:14 PM, Villmow, Micah <Micah.Villmow at amd.com> wrote: > I am attempting to lower the selectCC instruction to the instruction set of > the backend I'm working on and I cannot seem to find a way to correctly > implement this instruction. I know how this instruction should get > implemented; I just have yet to find a way to do it. I want the select_cc

Hello, I have a x,y,z file.Z is not corresponding to a simple analytical function of x and y (see below). I am trying to find the minimum location of this surface and the z value corresponding to this location by a spline interpolation or from a polynomial fit. I tried with the akima package but as the location of the point I am looking for (the minimum) is outside of the convex hull it's

Eli, Thanks for the tips. I've been able to get something working using a custom instruction inserter, however, I'm still having the problem of linking together the setcc and the select_cc commands. I want to turn the setcc into a comparison and use the results in the select_cc register. However, the comparison information is in the select_cc instruction and the result of the comparison

Dear R users When I use OPTIM with BFGS, I've got a significant result without an error message. However, when I use OPTIMX with BFGS( or spg), I've got the following an error message. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > optimx(par=theta0, fn=obj.fy, gr=gr.fy, method="BFGS", >

Package: src:xcp-vncterm Version: 0.1-2 Severity: important Tags: sid jessie User: debian-glibc at lists.debian.org Usertags: ftbfs-glibc-2.17 The package fails to build in a test rebuild on at least amd64 with eglibc-2.17, but succeeds to build with eglibc-2.13. The severity of this report may be raised before the jessie release. The test rebuild was done together with GCC-4.8, so some issues

Hi, I would like to know how to capture the console output from running an algorithm for further analysis. I can capture this using capture.output() but that yields a character vector. I would like to extract the actual numeric values. Here is an example of what I am trying to do. fr <- function(x) { ## Rosenbrock Banana function on.exit(print(f)) x1 <- x[1] x2 <- x[2]