similar to: [Patch] Enable "sysrq c" handler for domU coredump

Hi, When I tested pvfb, I got the following warnings. It seems to be caused by checking/setting info->dirty without dirty_lock. We need to check/set info->dirty safely. xenfb_update_screen bogus rect 2147483647 0 2147483647 0 BUG: warning at /root/linux-2.6.18-xen.hg/drivers/xen/fbfront/xenfb.c:240/xenfb_update_screen() Call Trace: [<ffffffff8036920e>] xenfb_thread+0x19b/0x2be

Hi, I got the following compilation error. This patch fix the error, I think it is needed for xen-testing tree. /root/unstable/linux-2.6.18-xen.hg/scripts/mod/sumversion.c: In function ''get_src_version'': /root/unstable/linux-2.6.18-xen.hg/scripts/mod/sumversion.c:384: error: ''PATH_MAX'' undeclared (first use in this function)

Hi, This patch is enabling write access during rom_scan. Signed-off-by: Akio Takebe <takebe_akio@jp.fujitsu.com> Best Regards, Akio Takebe _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel

Two things: 1. I''m not convinced ''xm crash'' is needed - ''xm destroy'' will do this (and if you want a dump, do ''xm dump'' followed by ''xm destroy'') 2. I don''t see the point of the --noreboot option on ''xm dump'' -- I think this command should simply live-dump the specified domain - as

I am seeing random reboots after installing Xen 3.2.1 (running with linux-2.6.18-8 pulled from a few days ago). So far, the reboots only happen if I have enabled cpufreq=dom0-kernel and actually run frequency scaling (such as with the ondemand governor). The reboots only happen after a few hours. The machines seem to be stable if I pass the cpufreq option to Xen but disable frequency scaling. I

This cset: changeset: 11473:0008fca70351 date: Thu Sep 14 08:19:38 2006 +0100 description: xm dump command add on xm dump-core [-L|--live][-C| --crash] <domID> [output path] Didn''t actually implement anything. Worse, it looks like we don''t even pause the domain, so it''s always live (not good). What''s going on? regards john

Hi Keir, This patch updates the ia64 buildconfigs, enabling pcifront for all kernels and pciback for -xen and -xen0. Thanks, Alex Signed-off-by: Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@hp.com> --- diff -r 4833dc75ce4d buildconfigs/linux-defconfig_xen0_ia64 --- a/buildconfigs/linux-defconfig_xen0_ia64 Fri Jul 28 17:52:57 2006 +0100 +++ b/buildconfigs/linux-defconfig_xen0_ia64 Fri Jul 28

Hallo *! I have a board SE7501HG2. - On 2.6.18 ipmitool works succefull. On Xen-3.1 (2.6.18) ipmitool say: # ipmitool sensor WARNING: Unknown SDR repository version 0x00 SDR record id 0x0000: invalid length 0 (see thread [ipmitool-devel] Unknown SDR version) - On page [4] as written: ipmitool -> BMC ---> i2c/smbus ''-> SDR - On Thread [9] was written:

Hi, Is there any tool out there that can help me analyze a coredump? Thanks, David. _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel

This patch unifys error messag of migrate and sysrq. Signed-off-by: Yoshinori Katase <y_katase@soft.fujitsu.com> Best Regards, Yoshinori Katase diff -r bfcdf4099d23 tools/python/xen/xm/migrate.py --- a/tools/python/xen/xm/migrate.py Thu Jan 12 13:27:55 2006 +++ b/tools/python/xen/xm/migrate.py Fri Jan 13 15:26:14 2006 @@ -56,8 +56,8 @@ if opts.vals.help: opts.usage()

Hi, i''m a little bit stuck here with creating a HVM-Windows (w2k3) Guest under Xen 3.1. I''m using ubuntu 7,10 with a 2.6.22.16-xen-patched kernel which seems to be stable for single cpu-linux guests. Cpu is a Q6600 and XD,VT and VT-d is enabled in the bios. When i create the windows guest with ''xm create w2k3 -c" (conf below) I get: "Started domain

This patch adds the ia64-specific code for new Qemu . In addition, some ia64 patches aren''t checked into xen-unstable.hg, so I reversed the related logic temporarily. Once sync with xen-ia64-unstable.hg, the logic will regain automatically. Thanks & Best Regards -Xiantao OTC,Intel Corporation _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list

> Hi, Simon > > >Two things: > > > >1. I''m not convinced ''xm crash'' is needed - ''xm destroy'' will do this > >(and if you want > > a dump, do ''xm dump'' followed by ''xm destroy'') > > > What do you mean? > I think we cannot dump with "xm destroy" now. >

Hi, Sometimes when I mount a disk image, unmount it, and then try to create a domU using the disk image I get the following error: Error: Device 2049 (vbd) could not be connected. Backend device not found. Im using a FC4 image. Here is the config file: kernel = "/boot/vmlinuz-2.6.16-rc3-xenU" memory=256 name=Domain1 vif = [''bridge=xenbr0''] disk = [

Hi, I downloaded xen-3.3.0.tar.gz and linux-2.6.18-xen-3.3.0.tar.gz from http://www.xen.org/download. when I executed "hg clone http://xenbits.xensource.com/linux-2.6.18-xen.hg", there was an error. Prompt was: destination directory: linux-2.6.18-xen.hg abort: error: Temporary failure in name resolution How can fix this problem? Thanks, Jeff.Gu

Hi All, We will hold a Linux IO controller Mini-Summit in Tokyo, Japan on Saturday, Oct. 17, 2009 -- day before the 9th Linux kernel summit. This is a good opportunity to meet face-to-face to discuss issues and directions for developing IO controller. Details of the summit are still sketchy, so suggestions for agenda topics are welcome. Please e-mail to me or post on the wiki page at

Hi All, We will hold a Linux IO controller Mini-Summit in Tokyo, Japan on Saturday, Oct. 17, 2009 -- day before the 9th Linux kernel summit. This is a good opportunity to meet face-to-face to discuss issues and directions for developing IO controller. Details of the summit are still sketchy, so suggestions for agenda topics are welcome. Please e-mail to me or post on the wiki page at

Hi All, We will hold a Linux IO controller Mini-Summit in Tokyo, Japan on Saturday, Oct. 17, 2009 -- day before the 9th Linux kernel summit. This is a good opportunity to meet face-to-face to discuss issues and directions for developing IO controller. Details of the summit are still sketchy, so suggestions for agenda topics are welcome. Please e-mail to me or post on the wiki page at

> Daniel Kiper <daniel.kiper at oracle.com> writes: > > > Some kexec/kdump implementations (e.g. Xen PVOPS) could not use default > > Linux infrastructure and require some support from firmware and/or hypervisor. > > To cope with that problem kexec firmware infrastructure was introduced. > > It allows a developer to use all kexec/kdump features of given firmware

> Daniel Kiper <daniel.kiper at oracle.com> writes: > > > Some kexec/kdump implementations (e.g. Xen PVOPS) could not use default > > Linux infrastructure and require some support from firmware and/or hypervisor. > > To cope with that problem kexec firmware infrastructure was introduced. > > It allows a developer to use all kexec/kdump features of given firmware