similar to: [Fwd: stack overflow "cause" found]

Hi, I just added 32GB memory in my system and wanted Xen to see that memory, so enabled PAE in xen0 and XenU. I did a make menuconfig in xen0 and xenU, then did a make in xen-unstable and a make install. Whilebooting this kernel, I get the above error PAE mode mismatch. I looked under xen/include/asm-x86/processor.h has #define X86_CR4_PAE defined and so does cpufeature.h have this defined.

To accomodate Intel''s ACPI support, VMX assist now lives at 0xD0000. Leendert Signed-Off-By: Leendert van Doorn <leendert@watson.ibm.com> --- xeno-unstable.orig/xen/include/public/vmx_assist.h 2005-04-22 02:26:10.000000000 -0400 +++ xeno-unstable.mine/xen/include/public/vmx_assist.h 2005-05-31 13:22:39.000000000 -0400 @@ -21,7 +21,7 @@ #ifndef _VMX_ASSIST_H_ #define

I can boot a 64-bit HVM image on my SVM-system, and it goes quite a long way before it crashes (due to not finding the hard-disk image and thus no root FS - which I think may well be the configuration file). But if I set debug=y in the Rules.mk, I don''t get very far at all - it crashes well before it gets to any user-mode (Ring3) - in fact, I think it''s crashing pretty much as

On Mar 15, 2006, at 10:04 AM, Chris Lattner wrote: > On Wed, 15 Mar 2006, Vikram S. Adve wrote: >> [I've changed the subject to make this a new thread.] >> >> While all of this makes sense to me, note that Markus and John >> were asking about different situations. Markus was asking about >> user-written source code. John was asking about a compiler pass

On Mar 15, 2006, at 11:15 AM, Chris Lattner wrote: > On Wed, 15 Mar 2006, Vikram S. Adve wrote: >>> Why can't the compiler pass just call InlineFunction(CallSite) on >>> the callsite it wants inlined? The only way that can fail is if >>> LLVM cannot ever inline the call (e.g. it uses varargs). > >> In some cases, that would be fine. But in other

On Thu, Jan 31, 2019 at 05:33:58PM +0100, Joerg Roedel wrote: > Hi, > > here is the next version of this patch-set. Previous > versions can be found here: > > V1: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20190110134433.15672-1-joro at 8bytes.org/ > > V2: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20190115132257.6426-1-joro at 8bytes.org/ > > V3:

On Thu, Jan 31, 2019 at 05:33:58PM +0100, Joerg Roedel wrote: > Hi, > > here is the next version of this patch-set. Previous > versions can be found here: > > V1: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20190110134433.15672-1-joro at 8bytes.org/ > > V2: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20190115132257.6426-1-joro at 8bytes.org/ > > V3:

On Wed, 15 Mar 2006, Vikram S. Adve wrote: >> Why can't the compiler pass just call InlineFunction(CallSite) on the >> callsite it wants inlined? The only way that can fail is if LLVM cannot >> ever inline the call (e.g. it uses varargs). > In some cases, that would be fine. But in other cases: > (1) It cannot "un-inline" any function that was previously

Vikram S. Adve wrote: Hmmm. It seems the discussion has grown a little bit larger than I had intended. :) Basically what I think would be useful is an option to the inliner that gives it a list of functions to skip when inlining. My argument for this is that we have several transformations now that search for calls to specific functions; if those functions are inlined, the transform pass

Hi, Get these now: this one with non-pae builds: arch/i386/kernel/built-in.o: In function `APIC_init_uniprocessor': (.init.text+0x6357): undefined reference to `setup_boot_clock' this on both pae and non-pae (CONFIG_MAGIC_SYSRQ=y): drivers/built-in.o: In function `xencons_rx': (.text+0x17f09): undefined reference to `sysrq_enabled' cheers, Gerd -- Gerd Hoffmann

Hi, Get these now: this one with non-pae builds: arch/i386/kernel/built-in.o: In function `APIC_init_uniprocessor': (.init.text+0x6357): undefined reference to `setup_boot_clock' this on both pae and non-pae (CONFIG_MAGIC_SYSRQ=y): drivers/built-in.o: In function `xencons_rx': (.text+0x17f09): undefined reference to `sysrq_enabled' cheers, Gerd -- Gerd Hoffmann

A simple reproducer is: ---------------------------------------------------------------------- #include <stdio.h> #include <stdlib.h> #include <stdint.h> #include <string.h> const char * copyn (const char *str, size_t n) { return strndup (str, n); } const char * copy (const char *str) { return copyn (str, SIZE_MAX); }

Previously with GCC 10.2 this code produced: In function ‘nbdkit_strndup_intern’, inlined from ‘nbdkit_strdup_intern’ at public.c:839:10: public.c:827:10: error: ‘strndup’ specified bound 18446744073709551615 exceeds maximum object size 9223372036854775807 [-Werror=stringop-overflow=] 827 | copy = strndup (str, n); | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ --- server/public.c | 16

On 9/3/20 4:41 AM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > Previously with GCC 10.2 this code produced: > > In function ‘nbdkit_strndup_intern’, > inlined from ‘nbdkit_strdup_intern’ at public.c:839:10: > public.c:827:10: error: ‘strndup’ specified bound 18446744073709551615 exceeds maximum object size 9223372036854775807 [-Werror=stringop-overflow=] > 827 | copy = strndup (str,

Filed upstream as: https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96916 Rich. -- Richard Jones, Virtualization Group, Red Hat http://people.redhat.com/~rjones Read my programming and virtualization blog: http://rwmj.wordpress.com Fedora Windows cross-compiler. Compile Windows programs, test, and build Windows installers. Over 100 libraries supported. http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/MinGW

On Thu, Sep 03, 2020 at 10:47:13AM +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > > A simple reproducer is: > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > #include <stdio.h> > #include <stdlib.h> > #include <stdint.h> > #include <string.h> > > const char * > copyn (const char *str, size_t n) > { > return strndup

I'm not sure if this is a GCC bug or a bug in our code, but the attached workaround fixes it for me. Rich.

Hi Michael, On Tue, Feb 05, 2019 at 03:52:38PM -0500, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > On Thu, Jan 31, 2019 at 05:33:58PM +0100, Joerg Roedel wrote: > > Changes to v5 are: > > > > - Changed patch 3 to uninline dma_max_mapping_size() > > And this lead to problems reported by kbuild :( Hmm, I didn't get any kbuild emails for this series. Can you please forward it me so

Hi all, I've been struggling for several weeks to get Microsoft Visual Studio 2005 to build FLAC. MinGW worked fine, but the resulting binary didn't support Cyrillic or Greek characters, so I thought MSVC might cut it. Anyway, I'm not a very good programmer, but I got it working. Probably it's of use to tell what I did 1) Compile ogg and get the library and include tree in the

On Wed, 15 Mar 2006, John Criswell wrote: > Vikram S. Adve wrote: > Basically what I think would be useful is an option to the inliner that gives > it a list of functions to skip when inlining. My argument for this is that > we have several transformations now that search for calls to specific > functions; if those functions are inlined, the transform pass can no longer >