similar to: Function dom0_ip in vif-common.sh fails in some configurations

Hello Lartc Mailing List: Been working on something the last week and a half and ALMOST have it working.., just need a few pointers from the wizards on this mailing list to nail it. Ok, my setup is a hub and spoke arrangement, hub is Cisco 2821 with IOS 12.4. Spokes are ruggencom RX1000 routers, Debian based with the following versions installed: rx1000test:~# uname -a Linux rx1000test

Hi, I posted this question yesterday on the Openvpn mailing list, with no response, figured I will ask here too. I have been using openvpn for quite a while, no major problems encountered. Now I need to allow the server to access the lan of the client, and I can not figure out the routing. This is what I have after the tunnel is brought up: SERVER (A.A.A.A) Arx:~# ip addr ... 3: eth1:

Package: xen-utils-common Version: 3.0.3-0-2 Severity: normal On my systen, the script vif-common fails to retrieve the primary IP address of my ethernet device, preventing a domU from starting. I tracked this issue down to the file /etc/xen/script/vif-common. The function ip_of uses the following shell code to extract the address: ip addr show "$1" | awk "/^.*inet.*$1\$/{print

I have a setup with two Internet providers. One circuit (net0 == eth1) is used primarily for employees and tunnels to other sites. The other (net1 == eth2) is for the production machines that customers access. Everythung works in teh sense that packets get to where they are sent (mostly) but I recently I had a sniffer on the system and noticed a problem I cannot solve. traffic coming in

Hi, I need a help on Linux routing, if you have some sparse time. I''m based in Madagascar and my English is not good; so please forgive me. *What I want to come-up with: *My main goal is to download using two modems at the same time, and combining their bandwidth, but I have failed miserably. The reason is this: our country is still using poor slow internets, and I have seen on the

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hi, I''m absolutely new to tc and found The Ultimate Traffic Conditioner to be exactly what I wanted as a starting point. Now the script doesn''t behave as I expected though, which applies to both the CBQ and HTB versions, the latter of which being my preference. The only changes made to the script are these assignments:

Hello, Here is my network: ------------------ ------------- ----------- Linux box ----------- GRE --------- Cisco ---------- ------------------ ------------- What I wan to accomplish. I want ripv2 to go across (both ways) through the GRE tunnel. No packets are being passed thought the GRE

A site I administer has dual T1''s. We have this set up according to NANO-HOWTO[1] using Julian''s routes patch on a late model 2.4 kernel. All is well, has been working well for a long time. Recently one of our T1 providers went belly up and we got something better. Now we have a /28 where previously we only used one IP per interface. Present interfaces: eth0 - T1#1, single

Hi, I have been a shorewall user for a long time now, and it has been working flawlessly. I have now changed ISP and my new DSL connection is PPPoE. My setup is as follows: internet <--------> 3com812 Officeconnect (bridge mode) <----> eth0 <-------> linux box <----> eth1, eth2, eth3, eth4 <---> other internal networks Things are working fine, but the link is

Another try and now with the info asked 4. nl1cat wrote: | Hello.. | I have a somewhat "funny" setup. | I use the dosemulator Dosemu for running a dos based packetradio nodeprogram | called Xrouter. | I setup dosemu to use my eth1 (lan) nic and i bring up a device called dsn0. | (this is all running on Slackware 9.1 without X) | insmod /etc/dosemu/dosnet.o | sleep 2 | ifconfig dsn0

I''ve got shorewall installed on Mandrake 9.0 As I boot my computer ( single workstation ) I do not get any connection to the net before doing; shorewall stop, shorewall clear, shorewall restart. Only after giving those three instructions everything is normal. Is there an easy way fixing this ? Or else how can I prevent shorewall starting-up at boot, in order to start it manualy once the

Having a problem with the 3 interface setup. I can get DMZ hosts, and FW to see internet, but anything on LOC interface is unable to get out. My first post to the list didn''t have the information needed, sorry for that, but thank you for pointing me to more resources. I''ve looked at the problem myself some more, but am still stuck. Shorewall Version: 2.2.1 ip addr show 1:

Heya guys and gals, I had a shorewall 1.4.x running on my router and somehow it decided to stop working. I didn''t really change something, it just stopped working really. Anyway, here the info that is asked for on the support page at first: # shorewall version 2.0.9 # ip addr show 1: lo: <LOOPBACK,UP> mtu 16436 qdisc noqueue link/loopback 00:00:00:00:00:00 brd

If you are running Lollipop / Android 5.x on your Nexus 5, then you are probably seeing the same issue I was with it. lollipop seems to change networking quite a bit in that it's using iptables / and `ip rule list` extensively for per-user settings. I think http://www.linux.org/threads/debugging-nat-prerouting-issues-iptables.7136/ is relevant if you see running in to the same issue, it's

Hello Tom, I''ve been using Shorewall for years without problems. My previous version of shorewall was 1.4.6b-1. Everything worked just fine. Today I upgraded using rpm to 2.0.8-1. After update no one can connect to any interface from net. Server can connect to outside world fine and those described in routestopped have no problem connecting. Any help correcting this problem would be

Hello, I recently setup Shorewall 2.0.9 on a RedHat 9 machine using the two interface quick start guide. ip addr show: 1: lo: <LOOPBACK,UP> mtu 16436 qdisc noqueue link/loopback 00:00:00:00:00:00 brd 00:00:00:00:00:00 inet 127.0.0.1/8 brd 127.255.255.255 scope host lo 2: eth0: <BROADCAST,MULTICAST,UP> mtu 1500 qdisc pfifo_fast qlen 100 link/ether 00:20:ed:76:dc:82 brd

SELinux is considered as the biggest problem. On Thu, Mar 26, 2015, 22:37 Andrea Squeri <andrea.squeri at gmail.com> wrote: > Yes. The problem is lollipop. I tried to install tinc on my brother's > device which mount a cyano 10.1( android 4.2.2) and it works. > I don't understand which is the problem with lollipop. Is there a > firewall that block the packets? >

> Dear CentOS-Community, > > we are facing the following issue: > > A secondary ip address seems to be automatically added to a nic which > causes several issues in our setup. Hi, Can you show as the config of eno4? And can you diff the config of eno1 and eno4. Looks like there is a difference somewhere. Regards, Simon > > > This server is equipped with four nics

I think it's more of a routing issue than anything explicitly blocking it, they use a new 'ip rule list' and per user settings that aren't well documented yet either, but where exactly to point I don't know. I haven't messed with android 5 much yet, it seems not ready enough yet for daily use, there isn't a single snapshot in the cyanogenmod repos, for example. So maybe

Hi Parke, Thanks, no I had not run those commands, but after doing so, my VPN address is not visible. See below: nsasia at db2:/etc/tinc$ sudo systemctl enable tinc at VPN1 Created symlink /etc/systemd/system/tinc.service.wants/tinc at VPN1.service → /lib/ systemd/system/tinc at .service. nsasia at db2:/etc/tinc$ systemctl start tinc at VPN1 ==== AUTHENTICATING FOR