Displaying 20 results from an estimated 30000 matches similar to: "[PATCH] linux: move page table pinning out of context switch code"
2011 Mar 28
0
[xen-unstable test] 6714: regressions - FAIL
flight 6714 xen-unstable real [real]
http://www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/~xensrcts/logs/6714/
Regressions :-(
Tests which did not succeed and are blocking:
build-amd64-oldkern 4 xen-build fail REGR. vs. 6658
build-amd64 4 xen-build fail REGR. vs. 6658
build-i386-oldkern 4 xen-build fail REGR. vs. 6658
2011 Jul 17
0
[xen-4.1-testing test] 8111: regressions - FAIL
flight 8111 xen-4.1-testing real [real]
http://www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/~xensrcts/logs/8111/
Regressions :-(
Tests which did not succeed and are blocking:
test-amd64-i386-rhel6hvm-amd 12 guest-localmigrate/x10 fail in 8104 REGR. vs. 8020
Tests which are failing intermittently (not blocking):
test-amd64-i386-rhel6hvm-amd 11 guest-localmigrate.2 fail pass in 8104
2008 Feb 01
4
[PATCH] x86: adjust reserved bit page fault handling
One could even debate whether reserved bit faults are always fatal (and
should never be propagated to the guest)...
Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@novell.com>
Index: 2008-01-28/xen/arch/x86/traps.c
===================================================================
--- 2008-01-28.orig/xen/arch/x86/traps.c 2008-01-28 11:31:44.000000000 +0100
+++ 2008-01-28/xen/arch/x86/traps.c
2010 Feb 25
0
[Xen-devel] Crash during boot in Debian lenny default dom0 kernel (2.6.26-2-xen-686) / bugfix patches
Hello,
The email (thread) below from xen-devel mailinglist indicates the changesets
that should fix the bug that causes the lenny 2.6.26 xen kernel to crash on
newer xen hypervisors.
The workaround for this bug has been to use pci=nomsi on the dom0 kernel cmdline,
but it would be better to apply the actual fix to the xen kernel in lenny.
More information on xen-devel (archives).
-- Pasi
2011 Sep 23
0
[xen-unstable test] 9061: regressions - FAIL
flight 9061 xen-unstable real [real]
http://www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/~xensrcts/logs/9061/
Regressions :-(
Tests which did not succeed and are blocking:
test-amd64-i386-rhel6hvm-amd 5 xen-boot fail REGR. vs. 8995
Tests which are failing intermittently (not blocking):
test-amd64-i386-pv 5 xen-boot fail pass in 9054
test-i386-i386-pv
2011 Jul 25
0
[xen-unstable test] 8270: regressions - trouble: broken/fail/pass
flight 8270 xen-unstable real [real]
http://www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/~xensrcts/logs/8270/
Regressions :-(
Tests which did not succeed and are blocking:
test-amd64-amd64-xl-pcipt-intel 5 xen-boot fail REGR. vs. 8256
test-amd64-i386-rhel6hvm-intel 3 host-install(3) broken
test-amd64-amd64-win 3 host-install(3) broken
test-amd64-i386-pv
2011 Mar 13
0
[xen-4.1-testing test] 6412: regressions - FAIL
flight 6412 xen-4.1-testing real [real]
http://www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/~xensrcts/logs/6412/
Regressions :-(
Tests which did not succeed and are blocking:
test-amd64-xcpkern-i386-xl-credit2 11 guest-localmigrate fail REGR. vs. 6379
Tests which did not succeed, but are not blocking,
including regressions (tests previously passed) regarded as allowable:
test-amd64-amd64-win 16
2011 Dec 16
0
[xen-unstable test] 10504: regressions - FAIL
flight 10504 xen-unstable real [real]
http://www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/~xensrcts/logs/10504/
Regressions :-(
Tests which did not succeed and are blocking:
test-amd64-amd64-xl-sedf 14 guest-localmigrate/x10 fail REGR. vs. 10491
test-amd64-i386-win 7 windows-install fail REGR. vs. 10491
test-amd64-amd64-xl-winxpsp3 7 windows-install fail REGR. vs. 10491
2010 Feb 26
0
[Xen-devel] Crash during boot in Debian lenny default dom0 kernel (2.6.26-2-xen-686) / bugfix patch
Hello,
More information and a patch for the bug.
-- Pasi
----- Forwarded message from George Dunlap <George.Dunlap at eu.citrix.com> -----
From: George Dunlap <George.Dunlap at eu.citrix.com>
To: Jan Beulich <JBeulich at novell.com>
Cc: Sander Eikelenboom <linux at eikelenboom.it>,
Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy at goop.org>,
Yunhong Jiang <yunhong.jiang at
2011 Dec 16
0
[xen-unstable test] 10511: regressions - FAIL
flight 10511 xen-unstable real [real]
http://www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/~xensrcts/logs/10511/
Regressions :-(
Tests which did not succeed and are blocking:
test-amd64-amd64-xl-sedf 14 guest-localmigrate/x10 fail in 10504 REGR. vs. 10491
Tests which are failing intermittently (not blocking):
test-amd64-amd64-xl-sedf 13 guest-localmigrate.2 fail pass in 10504
test-i386-i386-win
2007 Mar 22
1
[PATCH] use CC for defining CPP
Since CPP is being used with CFLAGS, it should be in lock-step with CC,
to avoid having to specify both CC and CPP for the build.
Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@novell.com>
Index: 2007-03-19/config/StdGNU.mk
===================================================================
--- 2007-03-19.orig/config/StdGNU.mk 2007-03-08 09:37:32.000000000 +0100
+++ 2007-03-19/config/StdGNU.mk
2011 Jul 17
0
[xen-unstable test] 8091: regressions - FAIL
flight 8091 xen-unstable real [real]
http://www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/~xensrcts/logs/8091/
Regressions :-(
Tests which did not succeed and are blocking:
test-amd64-i386-rhel6hvm-intel 12 guest-localmigrate/x10 fail REGR. vs. 8071
Tests which did not succeed, but are not blocking,
including regressions (tests previously passed) regarded as allowable:
test-amd64-amd64-xl-pcipt-intel 9
2008 May 31
1
[PATCH] xen: avoid hypercalls when updating unpinned pud/pmd
When operating on an unpinned pagetable (ie, one under construction or
destruction), it isn''t necessary to use a hypercall to update a
pud/pmd entry. Jan Beulich observed that a similar optimisation
avoided many thousands of hypercalls while doing a kernel build.
One tricky part is that early in the kernel boot there''s no page
structure, so we can''t check to see if the
2006 Sep 12
1
RE: 32E (64bit) VMX keyboard is out of control, ifgiven an addition ''hde''
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Jan Beulich [mailto:jbeulich@novell.com]
>Sent: 2006年9月12日 18:05
>To: You, Yongkang
>Cc: xen-devel
>Subject: RE: [Xen-devel] 32E (64bit) VMX keyboard is out of control,ifgiven an
>addition ''hde''
>
>
>Not sure what RC3 is, but the other two are Linux-es: Can you try rebuilding
>the guest kernels with attached
2006 Aug 25
1
[PATCH 1/4, RFC] x86_64: basic changes for supporting compatibility mode guest (version 2)
This introduces
- a (generic) config setting to turn on compatibility mode support
- support to load a Dom0 32-bit ELF image on 64-bit
- a compatibility guest mode GDT (requires moving the ring 0
selectors to different GDT slots), and the respective selector
handling changes
- some initial code path changes to address the needs of a
compatibility mode guest
Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich
2007 Apr 18
2
[PATCH] Simplify smp_call_function*() by using common implementation
smp_call_function and smp_call_function_single are almost complete
duplicates of the same logic. This patch combines them by
implementing them in terms of the more general
smp_call_function_mask().
[ Jan, Andi: This only changes arch/i386; can x86_64 be changed in the
same way? ]
[ Rebased onto Jan's x86_64-mm-consolidate-smp_send_stop patch ]
Signed-off-by: Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2007 Apr 18
2
[PATCH] Simplify smp_call_function*() by using common implementation
smp_call_function and smp_call_function_single are almost complete
duplicates of the same logic. This patch combines them by
implementing them in terms of the more general
smp_call_function_mask().
[ Jan, Andi: This only changes arch/i386; can x86_64 be changed in the
same way? ]
[ Rebased onto Jan's x86_64-mm-consolidate-smp_send_stop patch ]
Signed-off-by: Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2012 Feb 14
1
[PATCH] x86: don't allow Dom0 to map MSI-X table writably
With the traditional qemu tree fixed to not use PROT_WRITE anymore in
the mmap() call for this region, and with the upstream qemu tree not
being capable of handling passthrough, yet, there''s no need to treat
Dom specially here anymore.
This continues to leave unaddressed the case where PV guests map the
MSI-X table page(s) before setting up the first MSI-X interrupt (see
the original c/s
2009 Aug 28
2
[PATCH] x86/numa: fix c/s 20120 (Fix SRAT check for discontig memory)
That change converted the (wrong) assumption of contiguous nodes''
memory to a similarly wrong one of assuming discontiguous memory (i.e.
each node having separate E820 table entries). The code ought to be
able to deal with both, though, and I hope this change makes it so.
Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@novell.com>
--- 2009-08-24.orig/xen/arch/x86/srat.c 2009-08-28
2011 Nov 08
2
[PATCH] x86/IRQ: create_irq() should call assign_irq_vector()
... rather than __assign_irq_vector(), to ensure desc->affinity gets
initialized properly.
This at once eliminates the need to forward-declare the latter function.
Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@suse.com>
--- a/xen/arch/x86/irq.c
+++ b/xen/arch/x86/irq.c
@@ -25,7 +25,6 @@
#include <public/physdev.h>
static void parse_irq_vector_map_param(char *s);
-static int