similar to: Sub-selects with Find

So, I hear that with_scope is going to be deprecated. Which is a bit of a shame, given the stuff I''ve been writing recently. I have a CMS with multiple clients. A ''client'' is essentially a company, with multiple users. Content on the site belongs to a client - content could be messages, images, schedules, etc etc. People belonging to one client should not be able

I currently have two models. One holds users (username, password) and one "data" (title, message, etc.). I can handle login via filters I believe, courtesy of the Rails Recipes book. However, I''d like to limit what a user can see of the data. To do this, I added another table to the database with user_id and data_id fields. Now I''m a little stuck, as I

There are a number of good authentication frameworks for rails - has anyone developed a generic authorization framework? I''m thinking of something that included the concept of roles, mapped roles to both actions and users and could be used to wrap actions before their invocation. Extra good would be some way to check data permissions (as in, "yes you can perform the ''Edit

Hi all ! Is this supposed to work ? class Email < ActiveRecord::Base has_many :to, :class_name => 'Recipient', :conditions => "recipients.source = 'to'" do def create!(*args) with_scope(:create => {:source => 'to'}) do super end end def build(*args) with_scope(:create => {:source => 'to'}) do

In a Rails controller I set the scope on a model class in an around filter. I have defined expectations on the model classes, and ideally, I would add a further expectation for the scope. Is this already possible in some way? How would I go about adding support a scope expectation? Michael -- Michael Schuerig mailto:michael at schuerig.de http://www.schuerig.de/michael/

Hopefully someone can give me some advice on how to approach this problem... I''m getting ready to start a large new project where several different organizations would be working with a lot of tables. Each table would have an organization_id field to signify which organization owns that record. Organizations would only be able to view/edit records they own. Potentially thousands of

If with_scope has been called previously, how do I access the find conditions dynamically? I am asking because I am using a find_by_sql call (which clobbers the with_scope). How can I access the method scoping so that I can read it and incorporate it into my query manually? --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google

Hi, I''m beginner in rails, and I wanted to add to my simple application Authlogic. So I''ve watched http://railscasts.com/episodes/160-authlogic and step-by-step done everything. And almost everything works fine, except login in. After registration new user is automatically logged in, he can edit his profile, but after clicking logout and trying to login again I get error

Is there a way for me to do: OrderItem.find(:all, :include => [:user, :product => [:supplier]] So I don''t have a supplier_id on my order_item, but have it on my product, which is part of order_item. Joerg -- Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.

I have Acts_As_Taggable Plugin working. I have a HR controller and a sales controller. I have a document in hr tagged whitepaper and a differnent document in sales tagged whitepaper when I am in hr I see the hr document tagged with whitepaper and not the sale document (what I want). but if I click on the tag whitepaper I return two documents, hr and sales. I just want to return the hr document

People, I can order categories when looking at the categories list page but how do I change the recipe page to list the categories in alpha order in the recipe pull-down box?: > <p><b>Category:</b><br> > <select name="recipe[category_id]"> > <% @categories.each do |category| %> > <option value="<%= category.id

I have the following code: class User < ActiveRecord::Base has_many :requests do def find_active(options = {}) with_scope :find => { :conditions => ["requests.active = ?", true] } do find(:all, options) end end end end Executing user.requests.find_active results in the following SQL: SELECT * FROM requests WHERE (( requests.user_id = 10 ) AND (

Hi, It seems that setting a with_scope on the parent class doesn''t do anything MyClass.with_scope(:find=>{:conditions=> ["somecol = ?", ''val'']}) do @ext_pages, @ext_rows = paginate :my_extended_class, { :per_page => 13 } end # this doesn''t generate WHERE somecol=''val'' In order for scope to work you have to call

Hi ! I''m no expect when it comes time to configure Apache. I just enabled page caching in my Rails app, and am now looking at making Apache serve the cached files instead of calling into Rails. I know Mongrel is able to serve cached files if it finds them, but I''d like Apache to do it. Looking at .htaccess, there is this section: RewriteEngine On RewriteRule ^$ index.html

is there a way to always eagerly load an associated object so that you don''t have to put :include into every finder? class Product <ActiveRecord::Base belongs_to :user #always load user when product is loaded end Product.find(1).user.login #1 query since user was loaded with the product, same as if i used :include but I don''t want to have to specify it everywhere.

How can I achieve granular control over the validation for different controllers? I create users from an administration controller, but I don''t want to fill in all their information fields, just have their name and email address. When they accept the invitation, I want to implement validation on the other fields. I have looked at using :on => :update, but I would have to make the

There are areas of my application that "want" to use a url structure like domain/<human_readable_param>/<Module>/<Controller>/<Action>/<Id> Please note that the human readable parameter I need to inject is NOT related to the <id> being used by the action/controller pair. It''s identifying a container object whose contains are operated

How do I select a radio button when both id and name are identical?: <input type="radio" name="BILFPB.bilPremieUppgifterFI.under24" tabindex="13" value="J24" checked="checked" id="forare">Ja <input type="radio" name="BILFPB.bilPremieUppgifterFI.under24" tabindex="14" value="N24"

Hi! I''m trying to extend ActiveRecord''s find method (Rails 1.0, Ruby 1.8.2), but I recognize a strange behaviour of the "alias_method" call. I wrote a very simple script to explain my problem: ------------------------------------------------------ module ActiveRecordExtension def self.included(base) base.extend(ClassMethods) base.class_eval do

Hi All We want to install packages like xfig and transfig on centos 5.5. We found rpms available but them but it seems there are lot of dependencies for these packages. So we would like to setup yum repo for this. Can anyone suggest trusted baseurl for yum repo? Regards Hersh -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: