Displaying 20 results from an estimated 10000 matches similar to: "Error checking on migration?"
2006 Jun 09
10
Why do we use /usr/lib/python to install python libraries?
This seems exceptionally evil and is definitely a PITA. What was the
original problem that led us to do this? I''d like to take a stab at
correcting it so we can have a more sane installation.
Regards,
Anthony Liguori
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
2006 Mar 28
7
[PATCH] XML-RPC: Cope with large integers on x86-64 systems
Attached patch fixes a problem in marshaling large integers. It seems
to only occur on systems with very large memory. However, on those
systems, it''s a show-stopper. I see this as a temporary solution until
we can sanitize the XML-RPC functions and get rid of all the
S-Expression stuff.
I''ll run xm-test tomorrow against it. Right now I''ve only done basic
2006 Mar 19
14
Detecting deadlocks with hypervisor..
Hello,
I am trying to see if the hypervisor can be used to detect deadlocks in the
guest VMs. My goal is to detect if a guest OS is deadlocked, and if it is,
then create a clone of the deadlocked OS without the locking condition, and
letting the clone run. While the clone runs I am hoping to generate some
hints that could tell me what caused the deadlock.
I simulated a deadlock/hang
2006 Jun 09
15
[RFC][PATCH] Secure XML-RPC for Xend
Hi,
The following patch implements a secure XML-RPC protocol for Xend.
Instead of using HTTPS with basic authentication and dealing with all
that nasty OpenSSL/PAM integration, it just uses SSH. This gives you
all the properties you want (great security and PAM integration) with
very little code.
There are some minor issues so I''d rather it not be applied
immediately.
2006 Mar 23
1
[PATCH] Fixup a couple of problems with XML-RPC error handling
This fixes a number of problems introduces in the recent XML-RPC
check-in. The higher level errors are a great idea and I''ve also
extended it a bit to have a slightly nicer interface. Please apply.
Regards,
Anthony Liguori
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
2007 Apr 18
3
[RFC PATCH 35/35] Add Xen virtual block device driver.
> This is another thing that has always put me off. The
> virtual block device driver has the ability to masquerade as
> other types of block devices. It actually claims to be an
> IDE or SCSI device allocating the appropriate major/minor numbers.
>
> This seems to be pretty evil and creating interesting failure
> conditions for users who load IDE or SCSI modules.
2007 Apr 18
3
[RFC PATCH 35/35] Add Xen virtual block device driver.
> This is another thing that has always put me off. The
> virtual block device driver has the ability to masquerade as
> other types of block devices. It actually claims to be an
> IDE or SCSI device allocating the appropriate major/minor numbers.
>
> This seems to be pretty evil and creating interesting failure
> conditions for users who load IDE or SCSI modules.
2006 Dec 07
6
problem restarting xenstored
As any other daemon, I''d assume it should be possible to restart xenstored (i.e.
if it crashed or if, during development, a fix was made to it that needs to be
tested). However, as I learned after over a day of digging, things don''t work
anymore after doing so: Since the watches are transient, they''re lost with the
daemon going away.
Right now I specifically need this in
2008 Jul 19
11
HVM direct boot broken in xen-unstable
Hi!
On x86_64, changeset 18081, running/building on rhel5, trying to use the HVM direct boot causes the domain to reboot immediately and then the log says the domain is restarting too rapidly. No obvious hints as to where the problem is. If I build the in-tree ioemu code, things work. Any clues as to where to look or how to get some useful debugging output?
Thanks,
John Byrne
2005 Oct 27
2
[PATCH] Enable xenstat to use xenstore & fix bugzilla #311
Signed-off-by: Jerone Young <jyoung5@us.ibm.com>
--
Jerone Young
IBM Linux Technology Center
jyoung5@us.ibm.com
512-838-1157 (T/L: 678-1157)
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
2019 Feb 08
2
netmask on aliases overriden by netmask on interface
CentOS-6.10
We have a host with the following ifcfg file contents:
BOOTPROTO=none
BROADCAST=""
DEFROUTE=yes
DEVICE=eth1
. . .
GATEWAY=X.Y.Z.234
IPADDR=A.B.C.2
IPV4_FAILURE_FATAL=yes
NAME="LAN Link - eth1"
NETMASK="255.255.255.128"
NETWORK="A.B.C.0"
NM_CONTROLLED=no
ONBOOT=yes
PREFIX=25
TYPE=Ethernet
USERCTL=no
And an aliased ifcfg containing this:
2008 Aug 21
7
vnc port selection
Hi folks,
Xen''s qemu-dm version has a ''-vncunused'' command line switch which asks
the internal vnc server to pick any unused tcp port to listen on. The
actual port is communicated to the outside world via xenstore.
I''m looking for a reasonable way to implement that functionality in
upstream qemu. First, I think it shouldn''t be a separate command
2007 May 30
6
[PATCH 0/3] KVM paravirt_ops implementation
This is the start of a paravirt_ops implementation for KVM. Most of it
was done by Ingo Molnar, I just moved things around a bit. I don't
think there's a measurable performance benefit just yet but there are a
few more optimizations that I think we can get in time for 2.6.23 that
will be measurable.
Regards,
Anthony Liguori
2007 May 30
6
[PATCH 0/3] KVM paravirt_ops implementation
This is the start of a paravirt_ops implementation for KVM. Most of it
was done by Ingo Molnar, I just moved things around a bit. I don't
think there's a measurable performance benefit just yet but there are a
few more optimizations that I think we can get in time for 2.6.23 that
will be measurable.
Regards,
Anthony Liguori
2014 Dec 05
6
[LLVMdev] instruction/intrinsic for segmented adressing
Hi,
would like to use LLVM as backend for a compiler. One of the features I
would like to implement is segment based addressing for position
independent data. For some it may sound strange, for others the opposite.
No need to write complex story. Imagine you have a custom alocator that
manages an area of 1GB of memory. Your application uses a custom allocator
to allocate memory inside this area,
2013 Jun 03
11
[GIT PULL] Xen fixes and cleanups 20130603
Anthony,
please pull the following changes since commit
6a4e17711442849bf2cc731ccddef5a2a2d92d29:
ssh://xenbits.xen.org/home/sstabellini/git/qemu-dm.git xen_fixes_20130603
2007 Jun 17
10
[PATCH 0/5] KVM paravirt_ops implementation
Hi,
This patch series is an update of my previous paravirt_ops patches.
They are loosely based on Ingo's original paravirt_ops implementation
for KVM. Some of the changes since the last series include:
1) Switch to using CPUID 0x40000000 instead of using MSR writes to
discover shared memory area
2) Attempt to deal with SMP guests
3) Support for generic CR read caching
4) Support for
2007 Jun 17
10
[PATCH 0/5] KVM paravirt_ops implementation
Hi,
This patch series is an update of my previous paravirt_ops patches.
They are loosely based on Ingo's original paravirt_ops implementation
for KVM. Some of the changes since the last series include:
1) Switch to using CPUID 0x40000000 instead of using MSR writes to
discover shared memory area
2) Attempt to deal with SMP guests
3) Support for generic CR read caching
4) Support for
2013 May 30
2
updated: kvm networking todo wiki
Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha at gmail.com> writes:
> On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 7:23 AM, Rusty Russell <rusty at rustcorp.com.au> wrote:
>> Anthony Liguori <anthony at codemonkey.ws> writes:
>>> Rusty Russell <rusty at rustcorp.com.au> writes:
>>>> On Fri, May 24, 2013 at 08:47:58AM -0500, Anthony Liguori wrote:
>>>>> FWIW, I think
2013 May 30
2
updated: kvm networking todo wiki
Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha at gmail.com> writes:
> On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 7:23 AM, Rusty Russell <rusty at rustcorp.com.au> wrote:
>> Anthony Liguori <anthony at codemonkey.ws> writes:
>>> Rusty Russell <rusty at rustcorp.com.au> writes:
>>>> On Fri, May 24, 2013 at 08:47:58AM -0500, Anthony Liguori wrote:
>>>>> FWIW, I think