similar to: Resend: setting breakpoints around hypercalls in a domU causes dom0 to lockup

On 16/11/05, Kip Macy <kip.macy@gmail.com> wrote: > The way the initial memory space gets setup there is no way MFS could work. > It wasn''t an anticipated use. I guess somewhere either in FreeBSD GNATS or > xen''s bugzilla there should be i386-xen FreeBSD bugs filed for me to track. I intend to file a bug report sooner or later, but in the meantime I decided to

Presumably as a result of recent changes, FreeBSD no longer works with writable page tables. In the short-term I''m more interested in functionality than performance. This patch disables them and fixes a compile issue. # This is a BitKeeper generated diff -Nru style patch. # # ChangeSet # 2005/04/29 19:26:00-07:00 kmacy@curly.lab.netapp.com # disable writable pagetables + compile

Hello, I''m trying to get PDB working in accordance with the instructions at http://www.cl.cam.ac.uk/~sos22/replay.bk/docs/misc/XenDebugger-HOWTO and a message from this list: http://lists.xensource.com/archives/html/xen-devel/2004-08/msg00017.html When I try to build pdb I first get errors because the Makefile is configured to treat warnings as errors, and there are some warnings.

It looks like I can no longer map a page as uncacheable. Is this intentional? -Kip _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel

One of the things that I''ve always thought was weird, but didn''t pay too close attention to is the fact that GETDOMAININFO will return a valid result even if we give it a domid that is no longer valid. Looking at the code we get back the first valid domain after the domid we pass in. What is the reason for this design choice? When I request the attributes of a process I

I''ve locked up my dom0 a couple of times this morning copying a 3GB file from local disk to an NFS mount(neither xend nor guests running). I don''t encounter this problem on the stock CentOS 4 kernel. The machine is a PowerEdge 2850 with 2 e1000 cards - the one in use is connected to a PowerConnect 2216 10/100 switch and has negotiated 100Mbit. I''ll check if the stock

Hi! May anyone assist me with booting FreeBSD DomU (under Debian Dom0). Now I''m using the kernel-current, downloaded from Kip Macy site at http://www.fsmware.com/xenofreebsd/7.0/download/ The problem is that I can''t specify _any_ root, the kernel can recognize: Mount point / had 1 dangling refs Manual root filesystem specification: <fstype>:<device> Mount

# This is a BitKeeper generated diff -Nru style patch. # # ChangeSet # 2005/03/23 18:27:49-08:00 kmacy@shemp.lab.netapp.com # only bump tmpindex by NKPT-1 once # release sched lock on upcall # Signed-off-by: Kip Macy <kmacy@fsmware.com> # # freebsd-5.3-xen-sparse/i386-xen/i386-xen/machdep.c # 2005/03/23 18:24:47-08:00 kmacy@shemp.lab.netapp.com +0 -4 # remove extra bump of

Just wanted to try domU freebsd and found <http://216.239.59.104/search?q=cache:M_4r1b-RG- EJ:www.fsmware.com/xenofreebsd/5.3/xenbsdsetup.txt&hl=en&lr=&strip=1> but the webservice on www.fsmware.com seems to be down/unavailable. Any mirror? Or other working FreeBSD domU-kernels & images? Regards, /nils. _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing

> -----Original Message----- > From: Ian Pratt [mailto:Ian.Pratt@cl.cam.ac.uk] > Sent: 15 May 2004 09:59 > To: Kip Macy > Cc: Neugebauer, Rolf; Ian Pratt; Keir Fraser; xen- > devel@lists.sourceforge.net; Ian.Pratt@cl.cam.ac.uk > Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] telnet xend > > > > I now have secondary domains up and running with iSCSI luns as the root > > device.

I''m using the exact same setup as I''ve successfully been using for both -testing and -unstable. However, at least as of today, guests on -testing can''t see the network. >From my -unstable machine: vif13.0 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr FE:FF:FF:FF:FF:FF UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST MTU:1500 Metric:1 RX packets:1095 errors:0 dropped:0

I encountered a problem with dom0 when rebooting and running an intel gigabit card using the pro/1000 driver. When the system tries to shut down I get the following output of an strace command : ......... 17:10:49.063616 socket(PF_INET, SOCK_DGRAM, IPPROTO_IP) = 3 <0.000029> 17:10:49.063689 ioctl(3, 0x8913, 0xbffffc80) = 0 <0.000018> 17:10:49.063751 ioctl(3, 0x8914, 0xbffffc80) =

Is there any way for unprivileged guests to map each others memory without grant tables? Now that the pressure is off for me to support SMP internally, I''d like to switch back to using -testing. Thanks. -Kip _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel

I'm having problems getting PF + ALTQ to work on em(4) interfaces under 8.0-RELEASE. Kernel was rebuilt with the additional options necessary for ALTQ and what not. Same basic configuration works fine under 7.2-RELEASE. Basically, the queues create successfully but running a pfctl -vsq shows a zero packet/byte count for all queues, even the interface's root queues. This same problem is

On Fri, 14 Oct 2016 15:45:39 +0200 Ronny Forberger <ronnyforberger at ronnyforberger.de> wrote: > > > Am 14.10.2016 um 15:29 schrieb Rowland Penny via samba: > > On Fri, 14 Oct 2016 15:16:17 +0200 > > Ronny Forberger via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > > > >> > >> Am 14.10.2016 um 15:05 schrieb L.P.H. van Belle via samba: >

Using the 2.0.6 demo cd image, I booted the supplied freebsd image and rsync''d the file system to an NFS server. However I don not seem to be able to succesfully boot from it the system just hangs here: xn0: bpf attached xn0: Ethernet address: aa:00:00:61:1c:d4 lo0: bpf I have modified /sbin/start_freebsd.sh and /etc/xen/freebsd.py to generate the following configuration: xendemo:~#

On Sat, 15 Oct 2016 18:17:18 +0200 Ronny Forberger <ronnyforberger at ronnyforberger.de> wrote: > > > Am 14.10.2016 um 16:00 schrieb Rowland Penny via samba: > > On Fri, 14 Oct 2016 15:45:39 +0200 > > Ronny Forberger <ronnyforberger at ronnyforberger.de> wrote: > > > >> > >> Am 14.10.2016 um 15:29 schrieb Rowland Penny via samba: >

On Sun, Mar 15, 2015 at 5:56 PM, Sonny Rajagopalan <sonny.rajagopalan at gmail.com> wrote: > George, > > I have the detailed log below. (Resending after trimming the email to 40KB.) > > The sequence below just repeats ad-nauseam. Is this a SIP trunk issue? > > Thanks! > I don't see anything obvious. The registration works though, right? You might want to compare

Hi, I understand that 64-bit support for xen (from the side of host OSes) will be a little late, so i have a couple of questions: 1) Can i install a x86 32-bit xen kernel on x86_64 pc, without problems? 2)If i install a x86_64 xen kernel, can i run 32-bit host OSes on it? I know little about Xen, so i''d like to clear these out. Thanks

Hey list, I am having problems as of late with my rsync backup. On the client side I am using the following: OPTS="-avvvrz       --compress-level=9       --itemize-changes       --delete       --delete-excluded       --human-readable       --files-from=$FILES       --include-from=$INCLUDES       --exclude-from=$EXCLUDES       --partial