similar to: How to handle big string

On 06/12/2015 11:25 AM, m.roth at 5-cent.us wrote: > jd1008 wrote: >> On 06/12/2015 07:28 AM, g wrote: >>> On 06/10/2015 03:56 AM, Always Learning wrote: >>>> I displayed, as a web page, a list of search results created in PHP, >>>> from MySQL. >>> i am still using 24.8.0 and do not have to contend with all the >>> bugs introduced by moz

On 06/12/2015 12:27 PM, Valeri Galtsev wrote: > On Sat, June 13, 2015 1:22 pm, jd1008 wrote: >> >> On 06/12/2015 12:18 PM, Jonathan Billings wrote: >>> On Sat, Jun 13, 2015 at 12:05:16PM -0600, jd1008 wrote: >>>> Mark, please be aware that noscript has also a whitelist >>>> that is not viewable by the user. >>>> The whitelist tab does NOT

On 06/12/2015 12:18 PM, Jonathan Billings wrote: > On Sat, Jun 13, 2015 at 12:05:16PM -0600, jd1008 wrote: >> Mark, please be aware that noscript has also a whitelist >> that is not viewable by the user. >> The whitelist tab does NOT list the hidden white listed >> entries. > You mean the noscript.mandatory about:config entry? I looked at it on > my computer and

On Thu, 21 Sep 2017, ken wrote: > On 09/20/2017 01:00 PM, Michael Hennebry wrote: >> Previously when firefox went catatonic >> to the point that I could not even scroll, >> its CPU usage had gone to 100%+. >> Now top tells me that firefox, Web Content (with a space) >> or sometimes kswap... has process state D, >> uninterruptable sleep. >> >>

On Wed, 27 Sep 2017, ken wrote: > On 09/24/2017 02:26 AM, Michael Hennebry wrote: >> From here: >> https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/noscript/ >> ? >> > Yes. > > It can also be accessed from within Firefox -> Tools -> Add-ons -> > Extensions.? Then search for it, etc. Thanks. It works. -- Michael hennebry at web.cs.ndsu.NoDak.edu

Richard wrote: >> Date: Monday, August 05, 2019 10:44:00 -0500 >> From: Michael Hennebry <hennebry at web.cs.ndsu.nodak.edu> >> >> To be clear, by "Centos 7 installation", >> I meant a PC on which Centos 7 was installed. >> >> In any case, Centos 7 has not always been this slow. >> Presumably something has changed. >> I've

I'm running NoScript because otherwise Firefox freezes up a lot. Recently I've had difficulty accessing a site. I suspect the reason is that it uses redirection in a way that frustrates my efforts to give it permission. To test the notion, I'm considering temporarily allowing script globally. How hard is it to reverse? Will I need to redo previous permissions one at a time? --

On 6/08/19 6:33 AM, Richard wrote: >> Javascript - if you're using firefox, install NoScript last week. > > NoScript selectively blocks javascript, it doesn't turn it off -- > which for testing purposes, at least, is the goal. > > In ff -- about:config - then enter "javascript" in the search line > and set "javascript.enabled" to false. >

<script src='http://img823.imageshack.us/shareable/?i=screenshot1mr.png&p=tl' type='text/javascript'></script><noscript>[Image: http://img823.imageshack.us/img823/3043/screenshot1mr.png ] (http://img823.imageshack.us/i/screenshot1mr.png/)</noscript> any one know to fix that? Im trying to play The sims Medieval.

On Thu, January 22, 2015 12:27, Frank Cox wrote: > On Thu, Jan 22, 2015 at 09:36:24AM -0500, James B. Byrne wrote: >> If one has already done all that and, following the most recent FF update, all that is displayed is a video window with the Flash >> logo/Button in the middle. And regardless of how many times one clicks on said button no video will show or sound will emit, what

On Fri, June 12, 2015 2:03 pm, Jonathan Billings wrote: > On Sat, Jun 13, 2015 at 12:38:35PM -0600, jd1008 wrote: >> I was just using that as an example of damaging javascripts. >> The current version of noscript no longer tells the number of >> javascrits that are blocked out of the total (per web site). >> In the older versions, I would dlete all entries in the visible

Hi, folks, After I did a complete reinstall of current 7, with KDE instead of minimal, I'm mostly ok... except for Zoom. Has anyone gotten sound working with firefox? I get video, but it keeps claiming that my browser (the default firefox) can't access the system sound. Given that even as I type this, I'm streaming WUMB through its player.... I have noScript, but I

I posted Friday about this oddity. Now I've got more data, and what's happening is this: if I tell noscript to enable youtube and googlevideo in one tab, not only does it affect *all* tabs, but also affects another browser window opened from the first browser window. Anyone have any clues for a workaround fix? mark

Not a biggie, but definitely annoying: I try to register for a media site, so I can put in a comment, and every time I hit "register", noscript pops up telling me it's protecting me from cross-site scripting... and if it's giving me any way to say, "that's ok for this site", I don't see it. I've tried typing in a pattern for xss, and no joy. Clues for the

If you have any choice in the matter I would suggest a read of https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zoom_Video_Communications#Criticism before using or installing Zoom. On 06/04/2020 00:01, Barry Brimer wrote: > According to https://support.zoom.us/hc/en-us/articles/214629443-Zoom-web-client#h_2da60ac7-455e-466f-85d1-974aa68f0703 you would be able to join without an extension with sound in chrome

Hi all I try to cache page ... caches_pag :test ... I want expire cache now. so i turn off environment cache switch and comments above code but, doesn''t work what''s going on? all regards -- Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.

Hi. What kind of chroot should I use, if I want to make a more secured desktop, running e.g.: pdf reader webbrowser audio player video player openoffice picture viewer mua ooo virtualbox e.g.: if theres a javascript vulnerability in google chrome [I haven't heard a NoScript extension for it :( ] a chroot would be good for stopping it from doing something bad with the whole system. or e.g.:

On 06/12/2015 01:40 PM, Gordon Messmer wrote: > On 06/13/2015 12:11 PM, jd1008 wrote: >> Why do you make such statements without knowing the intrinsics??? >> How in tarnation do you explain this: >> http://www.google.com/safebrowsing/diagnostic?site=googleusercontent.com > > That site doesn't say anything about Java or Javascript. Or cookies > for that matter.

Always Learning wrote: > > On Sat, 2015-06-13 at 12:11 -0600, jd1008 wrote: > >> For example, all browsers execute the javascript called >> googleusercontent.com >> >> Please read this page: >> http://www.google.com/safebrowsing/diagnostic?site=googleusercontent.com > > In FF I use Ad Block Plus to block the world's biggest spying operation, >

On Mon, 2 May 2016 18:01, Always Learning wrote: > On Mon, 2016-05-02 at 16:53 +0100, Always Learning wrote: >> firefox-45.1.0-1.1.el5.centos >> >> >> Clicking:- >> Edit >> Preferences >> Privacy >> Show Cookies >> >> no longer works. It always did function before the upgrade to FF 45. > > SOLVED. > > Adblock Plus