Displaying 20 results from an estimated 120 matches similar to: "xen-2.0.4+ nanosleep and maybe other errors"
2002 Apr 11
3
rsync processes hang and client failing on "max connections"
rsync processes hang and client failing on "max connections",
I can't kill rsync process.
The temporary work around are:
increase max connections in /etc/rsyncd.conf
or
reboot the server !
The client get this error:
@ERROR: max connections (6) reached - try again later
$ ps -aux | grep rsync
admin 30408 0.0 0.0 1696 232 ? S Mar26 0:00 [rsync]
admin 28121 0.0
2014 Oct 28
3
[Bug 2301] New: test_sshbuf_misc.c:44 ASSERT_INT_NE(feof(out), 0) failed
https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2301
Bug ID: 2301
Summary: test_sshbuf_misc.c:44 ASSERT_INT_NE(feof(out), 0)
failed
Product: Portable OpenSSH
Version: 6.7p1
Hardware: MIPS
OS: IRIX
Status: NEW
Severity: enhancement
Priority: P5
Component: Regression
2003 May 22
1
sshd crashing on IRIX (3.6.1p1)
Occasionally, we're noticing that sshd is core dumping on our IRIX
6.5.18f machine.
The only time we've really noticed it is when users are logging in with
putty from offsite (although I'm not really sure it's a client issue).
The user manages to log in, sshd apparently core dumps, but the user is
not logged out, the privilege separated user is still running their own
2012 Apr 23
2
Windows 2008R2 AD, kerberos, NFSv4
Hi,
I'm trying to set up NFSv4 on two boxes (centos 5.5) and have it
authenticate against our Windows 2008R2 AD server acting as the KDC.
(samba/winbind is running ok with "idmap config MYCOMPANY: backend = rid"
so we have identical ids across the servers.)
I can mount my test directory fine via NFSv4 *without* the sec=krb5 option.
However, once I put the sec=krb5 option in,
2007 Nov 30
1
Conexant fax/modem not faxing with sendfax
I finally picked up a "real" modem (not a winmodem) and put it in my
machine. I pulled down the hsfmodem driver from the source, got a license
and installed the driver at full power.
If I use wvdial, I can get out through the modem, so I know that works.
However, sendfax is rejecting the fax capability (from
/var/log/sendfax.log):
11/30 00:31:52 sendfax: interim release 1.1.33-Apr10
2003 Feb 26
1
nanosleep
Could someone familear with the OpenBSD tree please point me to nanoslep.
scp.c now uses it and it's not in all plattorms so we'll ethier have to add
one to openbsd-compat or ifdef that chunk.
Thanks.
--
Tim Rice Multitalents (707) 887-1469
tim at multitalents.net
2019 Aug 28
0
Re: [PATCH nbdkit] freebsd: In nbdkit_nanosleep, fallback to calling nanosleep(2).
On 8/28/19 11:14 AM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> Rather than failing to compile on platforms which lack POLLRDHUP such
> as FreeBSD, simply fallback to the old method of sleeping.
>
> This leaves the porting suggestions as a comment in case someone wants
> to implement a better solution for particular platforms.
> ---
> server/public.c | 38
2004 Aug 06
2
[PATCH] Solais has nanosleep, too.
This is a patch to configure.in which makes autoconf aware of the
availability of nanosleep() on Solaris.
In Solaris it's in librt, or in libposix4 if you're running an ancient
version (<2.6 I think)
/dale
-------------- next part --------------
Index: configure.in
===================================================================
RCS file: /usr/local/cvsroot/icecast/configure.in,v
2020 Mar 27
2
[Bug 14328] New: usleep() is obsolete, use nanosleep()
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14328
Bug ID: 14328
Summary: usleep() is obsolete, use nanosleep()
Product: rsync
Version: 3.1.3
Hardware: All
OS: All
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P5
Component: core
Assignee: wayne at opencoder.net
Reporter:
2009 Jun 10
0
[PATCH] Use nanosleep instead of usleep when waiting the hardware.
usleep() was being used without checking its return value. When the
server receives SIGALRM or SIGIO the waits are shortened and random
modesetting failures happen: Use nanosleep and loop around it until
the requested time has elapsed.
---
src/nouveau_hw.c | 2 +-
src/nouveau_local.h | 6 ++++++
src/nv_bios.c | 2 +-
src/nv_crtc.c | 2 +-
src/nv_include.h | 1 +
2003 Feb 01
1
Build errors on AIX 4.2.1: nanosleep
Hi All.
There are still build errors for scp on AIX 4.2.1 due to lack of
nanosleep (which you can see them live and in colour at [1]). The
attached patch fixes this by using the equivalent nsleep function on AIX
if it exists and nanosleep doesn't.
The patch is mostly the same as the AIX portion of the previous patch
for the nanosleep issue, the major difference being that the #define is
in
2019 Aug 28
2
[PATCH nbdkit] freebsd: In nbdkit_nanosleep, fallback to calling nanosleep(2).
Rather than failing to compile on platforms which lack POLLRDHUP such
as FreeBSD, simply fallback to the old method of sleeping.
This leaves the porting suggestions as a comment in case someone wants
to implement a better solution for particular platforms.
---
server/public.c | 38 ++++++++++++++++++++++++--------------
1 file changed, 24 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
diff --git
2003 Jan 25
1
Build failures: nanosleep on Solaris and AIX 4.2.x
Hi All.
The recent changes to scp caused build failures on Solaris and AIX 4.2
which showed up on the tinderbox[1]. I mentioned the first to djm in
email yesterday but I'm posting after finding the second, in case anyone
else has seen similar problems.
Solaris' nanosleep is in librt (or libposix4 in older versions) which
is not linked. Adding them to configure works fine, however ldd
2003 Mar 17
3
nanosleep() replacement
I put together a nanosleep() for systems without it.
Please review/test before I commit.
It sems to make UnixWare and Open Server 5 happy.
My SCO Open Server 3 box broke so I can't test it there.
-------------< cut here >----------------
--- openssh/configure.ac.old 2003-03-09 17:16:43.000000000 -0800
+++ openssh/configure.ac 2003-03-16 15:38:28.520560008 -0800
@@ -1483,6 +1483,8 @@
2011 Oct 03
2
patch: Replace many usleep and some sleep calls with nanosleep
Description: Replace many usleep and some sleep calls with nanosleep.
usleep is stated in its manual page as removed by POSIX.
Contrary to its predecessors, nanosleep semantics is well
defined. The replacement, which is mostly in drivers, is
untested. Supplements http://bugs.debian.org/633791.
Last-Update: Sat, 13 Aug 2011 14:04:48 +0300
Index:
2005 Apr 21
1
libwine 20041019 needed
Hello,
I am deinstalling wine and reinstalling at the
20041019 level. I'm running the 2.6.11.7 kernel with
the debian distribution. In Aptitude I need to
reinstall wine, winetools and libwine. I can find the
20041019 version for everything except libwine. I
think libwine must be known by a different name in the
rest of the *nix world. I am downloading the RH9 RPM
from
2003 Jul 06
10
[Bug 585] sshd core dumping on IRIX 6.5.18 with VerifyReverseMapping enabled
http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=585
------- Additional Comments From dtucker at zip.com.au 2003-07-07 00:32 -------
dmalloc (http://dmalloc.com/) claims to work on IRIX. It's likely to increase
the CPU and memory load, though.
I've built with dmalloc on Linux thusly:
LDFLAGS=-ldmalloc ./configure && make
eval `dmalloc -l /path/to/log high`
./sshd [options]
2007 Aug 23
0
Bug#439207: postgrey: multiple recipients generates slightly different whitelisted message
Package: logcheck
Version: 1.2.57
Severity: normal
Tags: patch
In ignore.d.server/postgrey,
change:
^\w{3} [ :0-9]{11} [._[:alnum:]-]+ postgrey(\[[0-9]+\])?: action=.+, reason=.+, (delay=.+, )?client_name=.+,
client_address=.+, sender=.*, recipient=.+
to:
^\w{3} [ :0-9]{11} [._[:alnum:]-]+ postgrey(\[[0-9]+\])?: ([0-9A-F]+: )?action=.+, reason=.+, (delay=.+, )?client_name=.+,
2005 Apr 21
0
Fwd: Re: [smartmontools-support]cannot tell if I have a controller or disk problem
> <sebastian.vuorinen@helsinki.fi> wrote:
> > On Wed, 2005-04-20 at 18:34 -0700, Steve Nospam
> > wrote:
> > > I have to admit,I'm ignorant. I'm seeing a
> > problem
> > > reported in syslog (2.6.11.7 kernel debian
> dist.)
> > The
> > > problem reported is:
> > > Apr 20 20:19:53 sandbox kernel: hda: drive_cmd:
>
2002 Apr 11
4
rsync and debian -- summary of issues
There seems to be a thread about rsync and Debian packages every
couple of months. I've written up a document which tries to cover all
of the questions and debates. It's pretty informal, but hopefully
will be useful.
http://rsync.samba.org/rsync-and-debian/
I'd appreciate comments.
--
Martin