similar to: "Time went backwards" messages

Changeset 6902 Sep 18 13:37:23 inyoureyes kernel: 1: 5077390000000 Sep 18 13:37:23 inyoureyes kernel: Timer ISR/1: Time went backwards: delta=-34786504 cpu_delta=15257914 shadow=5076506780929 off=938478409 processed=50770Sep 18 13:37:23 inyoureyes kernel: 0: 5077480044418 Sep 18 13:37:23 inyoureyes kernel: 1: 5077430000000 Sep 18 13:37:23 inyoureyes kernel: Timer ISR/1: Time went backwards:

I''m using a NetBSD 3.1 dom0 with Xen 2.0.7 (so far as I know, the latest supported combination for the NetBSD platform). Linux domUs have their logs fill with messages like this: May 8 02:01:39 debian kernel: Timer ISR: Time went backwards: -316000 131542680000000 9684000 131542690000000 May 8 02:01:39 debian kernel: Timer ISR: Time went backwards: -277000 131542680000000 9723000

Hello, I have recently finally gotten xen working on a Dual Core Althlon64 4200, 4GB RAM, 3ware 9500 4x160GB SATA RAID 10, but after compiling xen with 3ware support, xen does start up but i get many (to many to even access the console) of these errors: Time ISR: Time went backwards: -xxxxxxxx xxxxxxxxxxxx xxxxx xxxxxxxxx where the x''s are replaced with different numbers each time.

All, I installed the new version of samba on my Redhat 9.0 server. I have samba running on another Redhat 9.0 server and the version of samba on that box is 3.0.21c-1 and this server has successfully joined a W2K Domain. I am trying to migrate the data from the host that works to the new host. Here are the steps that I have taken to try and join to the domain. 1. rpm -i -vv

Hi there: We have recently inherited a circa 1996 SGI Indy Colorbus Cyclone running on Irix. Our intention is to use this unit to drive our Canon CLC900 Scanner Copier and make it accessible to our Windows Network. At the moment, our Windows Network does not "see" the Cyclone & vice versa. I have read that installing some kind of Windows Samba client onto our windows

The attached patch to the qemu emulation of the pcnet hardware fixes several problems. It will now only read and write a transmit or receive descriptor once. It will correctly handle transmitting frames with more than two fragments. It will discard oversize frames instead of corrupting memory. I have tested all the changes I have made and even seen an improvement in receive performance from

Hi, Now I am working on BCC Cross-compiler in order to get the binaries for LEON3 (Google SoC 2007). I changed these lines of Makefile ... CC = gcc CPP = gcc -E ... to these : CC = sparc-elf-gcc -mv8 -msoft-float CPP = sparc-elf-gcc -mv8 -msoft-float -E The options means: -mv8 : generate SPARC V8 instructions -msoft-float : emulate floating-point When I run "make", there is a

[resending to correct llvm-dev address] Hi, I’d like to start enabling the loop data prefetch pass for Cyclone (an ARM64 subtarget). AFAICT, you can’t really add passes specifically to a subtarget but only to a target. This makes sense because in the new world, you could have different subtargets per function. I just want to make sure my understanding is correct. My plan is to add the pass

On Thu, 19 Jun 2008 09:44:46 +0300, Török Edwin wrote: > Hi, > > Have you seen this: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2008-06/msg00385.html > There is a new branch for converting gcc to C++. > > Best regards, > --Edwin The sad thing is that they seem to be replacing one unsafe language with another, presumably with enormous effort. The only hopeful sign in that thread is the

On Fri, May 19, 2017 at 4:01 PM Adam Nemet via llvm-dev < llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > I will run it on Cyclone/AArch64 next week. > FYI, we're still waiting on these Adam... -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20170530/7cb390ca/attachment.html>

Hi, Indeed, the complex add is more expensive on all Cortex cores I know of. However there is an important point here that the code sequence we generate requires two registers live instead of one. In high regpressure loops, were probably losing performance. James On Wed, 11 Nov 2015 at 21:09, Tim Northover via llvm-dev < llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > On 11 November 2015 at

I''m a newbie. :) I followed the steps written by Jerone Young: http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/message.php?msg_id=10562241 but i found an error at the 17th step: 17. mkinitrd /boot/initrd-2.6.10-xen0.img 2.6.10-xen0 it said:"No module ata_piix found for kernel 2.6.10-xen0, aborting." so I commented the line of "module /boot/initrd-2.6.10-xen0.img" in the

>I''ve been seeing these pretty regularly on a single-socket dual-core Athlon >system for the last couple of months, and only on Friday finally found time >to start looking into these. Besides the messages above, I also see hangs >in about every other boot attempt but only if I do *not* use serial output >(which makes debugging a little harder), and never once initial boot

All, Attached is a patch from Prarit Bhargava, who is not subscribed to the list (but CC''ed). His description follows: Add "Warning" to the "Time went backwards" message. Most QA groups (if not all) grep for specific messages in the syslog such as "Error", "Warning", "Oops". Time went backwards is a key error which can result in

On Wed, Jul 2, 2008 at 2:13 PM, Hendrik Boom <hendrik at topoi.pooq.com> wrote: > On Thu, 19 Jun 2008 09:44:46 +0300, Török Edwin wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> Have you seen this: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2008-06/msg00385.html >> There is a new branch for converting gcc to C++. >> >> Best regards, >> --Edwin > > The sad thing is that they seem

I continue to see occasional ''time went backwards'' messages on 3.0-testing on larger systems. Is anyone else seeing such? Have there been any improvements to -unstable that haven''t been moved over? If so, can anyone point out the respective changesets? Thanks, Jan _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com

Hi all, It’s been two weeks since I sent the last merge progress email, so here is an update. TL;DR: Almost done! Tim is considering suggesting making the final switchover sometime next week. This would be the final push, where AArch64 gets deleted and ARM64 gets renamed to AArch64, and would signal the end of the merge process. If any of you know of any reason why these two loving

Hello gurus, I have two physical xen hosts and when I migrate a domU from one host to another, I get many of this error from domU kernel: clocksource/0: Time went backwards: delta=-3536123661 shadow=686019823475 offset=281887188 Sometimes domU time stalls and network stops working, but other times it gets working again. The two hosts are using different platform timer source:

Hi, I need to derive a time series that represents the first derivative of an original time series. The function coefDeriv in the cyclones package seemed to be the ticket, but I'm not sure if I am interpreting the output of the function correctly...or even using the function correctly. This is a snipbit of what I've been trying: -------- library(cyclones) ## read in my 1-column of

Ping. Can I assume that we're ok with this interface proposal then? Amara -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20140127/49962cbc/attachment.html>