similar to: [PATCH] check read/write return values

Dears, I have the below code for metropolis of the GLM logit (logistic regression) using a flat prior. Can someone help me modify the prior so that the model becomes hierarchical by using a flat prior for mu and sigma, the derived density for beta ~ N(mu, sigma^2)? Actually I took my code from a teacher that posted on the internet and modified it to the GLM logit but I can't adapt it to the

I wrote a simple log likelihood (for the ordinary least squares (OLS) model), in two ways. The first works out the likelihood. The second merely calls the first, but after transforming the variance parameter, so as to allow an unconstrained maximisation. So the second suffers a slight cost for one exp() and then it pays the cost of calling the first. I did performance measurement. One would

On 05/04/2019 08:57, David B?rgin via dovecot wrote: > Andr?, are you quite sure you have it working? > > In this thread someone from Open-Xchange stated that no, Dovecot doesn?t > have SMTPUTF8 support implemented, and the same response was given by > another Dovecot developer last September (it ?is being considered? was > the answer then, see >

Hi, The following is with the latest (and last) puppetmaster/puppetd on FC5. I use puppet to configure a server and several workstations on my home network. This includes managing several files of >5Mbyte on the workstations. I have had problems recently with timeout errors on some of these files. These errors seem consistent for a particular puppet setup/configuration, but can change when

On 2019-04-05 08:57, David B?rgin via dovecot wrote: > Andr?, are you quite sure you have it working? > > In this thread someone from Open-Xchange stated that no, Dovecot > doesn?t > have SMTPUTF8 support implemented, and the same response was given by > another Dovecot developer last September (it ?is being considered? was > the answer then, see >

Hello r-help, I am trying to collapse or aggregate 'some' of a data frame. A very simplified version of my data frame looks like: > tester trip set num sex lfs1 lfs2 1 313 15 5 M 2 3 2 313 15 3 F 1 2 3 313 17 1 M 0 1 4 313 17 2 F 1 1 5 313 17 1 U 1 0 And I want to omit sex from the picture and just get an addition of num,

Hey guys. I''ve just found some odd behaviour within RSpec 1.1.12 , and would like to know whether this is a bug, or I''m doing something wrong. When I give multiple return values to a stub, like this: SubtitleFile.stub!(:new).and_return @sf1, @sf2 RSpec complains: Mock ''SubtitleFile_1001'' received unexpected message :size with (no args) However, if I

For those who are interested in checking out my initial specification for the FlacPak format, I updated the web pages at: http://swami.sourceforge.net/flacpak.php The direct link to the specification notes: http://swami.sourceforge.net/flacpak_format.php For those who weren't reading the previous threads, FlacPak is a format being designed to handle compression of files containing binary and

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12527 Bug ID: 12527 Summary: Sender waits for timeout when fuzzy basis file found Product: rsync Version: 3.1.2 Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: critical Priority: P5 Component: core Assignee: wayned at samba.org

----- Forwarded message from John <strgout@mail.unixjunkie.com> ----- Date: Mon, 15 Dec 2003 17:58:15 -0600 From: John <strgout@mail.unixjunkie.com> To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: interface bonding User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i Is there any way to bond sniffer interfaces? I've read a little on netgraph and it seems like i maybe able to use that but i'm not sure how to go

Hi, there. I have asterisknow beta 5 with the following data: Ip 192.168.0.60 mask 255.255.255.0 gw 192.168.0.1 the router (a linksys) has port forwarded the port udp 5060 and from 16384 to 16482 udp-tcp from the internet to the asterisk machine. the only protocol allowed is g729. Which work fine for the ip phones I already have setup in the LAN. My problem is trying to register to a voip

Hi all, This is a trivial patch which adds the two fields to start_info_t for the shared page and event channel port for the share. Feel free to destroy this in any way. The python binding just fills zeros in for the moment, making it harmless. Mike Wray has a nicer version in his tree, but this is the minimal version. (Thanks to Mike for the .esp fix, too). Cheers, Rusty. diff -ur

--- Darren Reed <avalon@caligula.anu.edu.au> wrote: > I'm curious, can you use netgraph, like this or > similar, to make > sf2/sf3 redundant interfaces on the same LAN ? > (Load balancing > traffic in/out of an NFS server, say.) > > Darren Hi Darren, I think that's the real purpose behind ng_one2many:

Install the gmp package, run your code, and then try this: bu <- gmp::as.bigq(u) bs4 <- bu[1] + bu[2] + bu[3] + bu[4] + bu[5] s4 <- as.double(bs4) s1 - s4 ## [1] 0 s2[[2]] - s4 ## [1] 7.105427e-15 s3 - s4 ## [1] 7.105427e-15 identical(s1, s4) ## [1] TRUE `bs4` is the exact sum of the binary rationals in your `u` vector; `s4` is the closest double precision to this exact sum.

My simple functions were to compare the result with the gfortran compiler sum() function. I thought that the Fortran sum could not be less precise than R. I was wrong. I am impressed. The R sum does in fact match the result if we use the Kahan algorithm. P. I am glad to see that R sum() is more accurate than the gfortran compiler sum. On 16/03/18 11:37 AM, luke-tierney at uiowa.edu wrote:

Hi all, I found a discrepancy between the sum() in R and either a sum done in C or Fortran for vector of just 5 elements. The difference is very small, but this is a very small part of a much larger numerical problem in which first and second derivatives are computed numerically. This is part of a numerical method course I am teaching in which I want to compare speeds of R versus Fortran (We

Andr?, are you quite sure you have it working? In this thread someone from Open-Xchange stated that no, Dovecot doesn?t have SMTPUTF8 support implemented, and the same response was given by another Dovecot developer last September (it ?is being considered? was the answer then, see https://dovecot.org/pipermail/dovecot/2018-September/112887.html). I am using LMTP to deliver mail to Dovecot from

>> You found it. The SHL32 (not SHR32) line fixes the problem. It must be >> doing a 16-bit shift, then extending the result (which is reasonable). >> As >> it happens, that it the same macro which gave us trouble last May >> (25th/26th), when the C55 build was more subtlely broken. > > Yes, that's what I finally remembered. I think I've fixed all

Dear R-users, I am facing problem with integrating in R a likelihood function which is a function of four parameters. It's giving me the result at the end but taking more than half an hour to run. I'm wondering is there any other efficient way deal with. The following is my code. I am ready to provide any other description of my function if you need to move forward.

Hello, I have a question about the way Xentrace takes a trace. In previous versions of Xen, I took a trace by setting the size of buffers, activating them and writing the information into a file (optional). setsize 20 tbctl 1 xentrace /tmp/xentrace.dat Now I''m using xen-unstable and I see that setsize is already integrated in xentrace command. My question is: does start/stop buffer is