Displaying 20 results from an estimated 9000 matches similar to: "RE: [PATCH 2/2] netfront skb padding"
2005 Feb 09
1
RE: [PATCH 2/2] netfront skb padding
> It appears that when alloc''ing a skb, it is bring padded by
> an arbitrarily
> (and excessive) long value. The value for this padding
> really only needs to
> be 24. 24 = 14 for the ethernet header + 2 for the cache
> alignment + 4 for
> the CRC + 4 for the VLAN flags.
Given that we''re allocating page sized buffers the current situation
2005 Mar 16
1
RE: Fwd: [Cooker] Re: Configure Xen in Mandrake 10.2 cooker
> PDC20265: IDE controller at PCI slot 0000:00:11.0
> PCI: Found IRQ 10 for device 0000:00:11.0
> PDC20265: chipset revision 2
> PDC20265: 100% native mode on irq 10
> PDC20265: (U)DMA Burst Bit ENABLED Primary PCI Mode Secondary
> PCI Mode.
> ide2: BM-DMA at 0x8000-0x8007, BIOS settings: hde:DMA, hdf:pio
> ide3: BM-DMA at 0x8008-0x800f, BIOS settings: hdg:pio,
2005 Mar 03
2
X problem (radeon/intel-agp) on unstable
Hi,
since 2.0.4 didn''t work with my notebook (see ''[Xen-devel] "general
protection faults" in dom0 when loading intel-agp module'') I tried
xen-testing. Now I''m on xen-unstable but I still get the following problem.
X loads but doesn''t display anything more than the X cursor. The rootwindow
looks kind of strange. Please see
2005 Feb 08
3
hardware-watchdog driver problems in linux 2.6.10-xen0
Hi!
I''m trying to run w83627hf_wdt.ko watchdog driver in domain 0 (xenlinux
2.6.10-xen0), but the driver doesn''t seem to work (the machine reboots all
the time after the watchdog-timeout set in BIOS).
Is there something that could prevent the driver from accessing the
watchdog-hardware (io-ports/registers) ?
The watchdog-driver is very simple, and you can find it in
2005 Feb 26
1
RE: Calculating real cpu usage of Xen domains correctly! (PATCH)
> OK, here is a patch which provides fine grained cpu utilization
> reporting. Some notes:
I really can''t see the point of this patch -- it isn''t necessary to log
every scheduling operation to record CPU usage for a domain over
multiple time scales.
Simply exporting the cumulative CPU usage for all domains and polling it
from dom0 will enable you to do this. If you do
2005 Mar 25
3
Framebuffer (was Xen port of ReactOS)
Fwiw, I think a ReactOS port would be very useful to both projects.
One thing I think xen could do with (if it isn''t there already) is some sort of virtual framebuffer like with disk and network. Dom0 could provide the backend of the virtual framebuffer (on virtual consoles or inside X windows or whatever), and the other domains could make use of the exported framebuffers. It
2005 Feb 11
7
fdisk hard drive image
Hello list,
Currently, i use a partition image to run my XenU (/dev/hda2) and "fdisk
-l" return nothing and can''t open /dev/hda .
I want to use a full hard drive image (not partition image) from my Xen0
as hda in my XenU. I want to be able to run fdisk on hda in my XenU to
list and regenerate partitions.
I tried with this (/img is my hard drive image):
disk =
2005 Feb 18
1
Update on Xen on my hardware with nForce SATA
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Hello,
I complained some time ago that a the dom0-kernel (2.6.9-based) inside
Xen would wait forever when trying to detect the hard disks connected
via the S-ATA controller, which is provided by the nForce 250Gb chipset.
The problem guessed by Keir (IIRC) was that the interrupt routing didn''t
work because Xen didn''t use ACPI to do
2005 Mar 20
4
I/O descriptor ring size bottleneck?
Hi everyone,
I''m doing some networking experiments over high BDP topologies. Right
now the configuration is quite simple -- two Xen boxes connected via a
dummynet router. The dummynet router is set to limit bandwidth to
500Mbps and simulate an RTT of 80ms.
I''m using the following sysctl values:
net.ipv4.tcp_rmem = 4096 87380 4194304
net.ipv4.tcp_wmem = 4096
2005 Feb 23
2
PSE in guests
Looking at the 2.0 code, it looks like the guest OSs are made to
believe that PSE is not available. Is this a design choice? Has any work
been done on supporting 4M pages in guest kernels?
Regards,
K. Y
-------------------------------------------------------
SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide
Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users.
Discover
2005 Feb 28
0
can dom0 use a virtual interface ( vif0.0 ? ) instead of a physical one?
Hello,
At first i want to thank you for your work on such a wonderful piece of
software. If can get my setup running as planned it will help me to use my
hardware ressources in a much more efficient way.
I''m a xen newbie an trying to setup following environment:
xen-2.0.4 compiled from source
hardware: 2 PIV 3GHz Processors, 1GB RAM, 2 NICs
Dom0: Debian Sarge kernel 2.6.10 on xen-br0
2005 Mar 27
0
RE: Interim Xen Wiki [was: domU Filesystems]
> On Fri, Mar 25, 2005 at 03:35:47PM -0600, Anthony Liguori wrote:
> > Here are the mechanisms I know and their requirements. I
> plan to put
> > this in the Wiki as soon as it goes live (if it''s not
> already there):
>
> Last "Real Soon Now" I saw was back ont he 10th, and that was an
> important reason I didn''t do this sooner. As of
2005 Feb 26
0
RE: [PATCH] warn when iproute2 or bridge-utils aremissing
> On Fri, 2005-02-25 at 19:08 +0000, Scott Parish wrote:
> > The attached patch checks for "ip" and "brctl" in the path,
> and warns
> > the user if they are not found.
> >
>
> Now that the routed setup is included (and IMHO works a whole lot
> better) shouldn''t the brctl check be optional somehow?
How''s about someone
2005 Mar 18
2
Trouble getting a DHCP address when booting.
Hi.
I spawned a thread last week about the failure of bridged networking and
I have gotten a little further. Turns out that I _do_ have network
connectivity from inside the domains, but I cannot get the network to
come up when I boot. I have to login and start up the network manually.
E.g. after installing Debian Sarge according to the debootstrap method
outlined in the users manual, I created a
2005 Mar 03
14
Serious performance issues
Hi. I have a Shuttle box with an AMD Athlon XP 2200+ and 1GB of RAM.
I''m normally running it with Debian sarge/sid and kernel 2.6.10-1-k7,
as built by Debian. I want to use Xen on it. I built a xen0 kernel
which is as close to the Debian kernel as I can (no power management,
no HPET timers, broken ISA drivers disabled), disabled /lib/tls, and
booted with the new kernel.
Everything works.
2005 Mar 02
24
unstable binaries
Hi *,
i am coming from UML, and now i evaluate Xen on my desktop:
Xen-2.0.4
linux-2.6.10
"CONFIG_MODULES is not set"
"CONFIG_AGP is not set"
"CONFIG_FB_RADEON=y"
FC3, [/usr]/lib/tls moved away
It works, but some desktop applications crash once in a
while within dom0:
metacity-2.8.6
firefox-1.0.1
wnck-applet (from gnome-panel-2.8.1)
But
2005 Mar 17
3
ntpdate issues?
Hi, I''m trying to run ntpdate from domain zero and getting
weird results. This used to work (prior to using xen). Is
this related to xen at all or an entirely unrelated issue?
Queries seem to work:
# ntpdate -q time-b.nist.gov
Looking for host time-b.nist.gov and service ntp
host found : time-b.nist.gov
server 129.6.15.29, stratum 1, offset 41.820087, delay 0.17027
17
2005 Mar 08
29
Interrupt levels
I''m tracking performance on the machine I installed yesterday.
mutt running on one Xen instance, accessing via imap to another
instance, accessing via nfs the maildir in another instances, seems
little laggy when moving up and down the message index list.
Network latency seems low < 30ms on average.
So I was tracking vmstat.
On the mutt instances is seems reasonable:
[nic@shell:~]
2005 Mar 21
11
NPTL/db4 problem with FC3
This is a cross post to <xen-devel@lists.sourceforge.net> and <user-
mode-linux-user@lists.sourceforge.net>
Dear lists,
Anybody successfully running cyrus-imapd in FC2/3+Xen/UML? When i tried
to run cyrus-imapd in a virtual FC3 (Xen or UML) i got lot''s of
DBERROR db4: Berkeley DB library configured to support only
DB_PRIVATE environments
DBERROR:
2005 Mar 07
1
Advice on HIGHMEM
Given that dom0 is itself doesn''t managed the memory directly that you
only need to compile HIGHMEM4G into the dom0 or domU kernels if you
intend to use more than 1G in one domX instances.
ie. Even if you have more than 1Gb of total physical memory, if none of
the domX use more than 1Gb of memory, there is no need to compile in
HIGHMEM4G.
Or, does dom0 need to be compiled with this in