similar to: Unable to create a new domain

Hi! I recently tried to mount a filesystem in RAID1 mode using loopback devices. I followed the instructions at [1]. Here''s exactly what I''ve done: $ dd if=/dev/zero of=raid1_0.img bs=1M count=500 $ dd if=/dev/zero of=raid1_1.img bs=1M count=500 $ mkfs.btrfs -m raid1 -d raid1 raid1_0.img raid1_1.img $ losetup /dev/loop0 raid1_0.img $ losetup /dev/loop1 raid1_1.img $ mount -t

Hi, This left me puzzled for a while: 22:29 borg:/ # losetup /dev/loop1 /.B.disk 22:29 borg:/ # mount /dev/loop1 /B mount: /dev/loop1: can''t read superblock 22:29 borg:/ # blkid /dev/loop1 /dev/loop1: UUID="e19fe89b-cde3-4ccc-bc70-b759a57bd1c9" UUID_SUB="f29c6218-d040-4546-a227-4dd2d2142817" TYPE="btrfs" 22:29 borg:/ # losetup -d /dev/loop1 22:29 borg:/ #

Is there something special about filesystems mounted via the loop device, which prevents Samba from sharing them? I have a small LAN with several PCs on it. It has a few Windows machines, and a Linux machine running Mandrake 10 (kernel 2.6.3), which shares out its root ("/") read-only as "c". (Temporarily, for testing, it is shared with full write permissions, which I know

How do I mount a partition that is in an image file? I have a file called centos.img that has 3 partitions in the file. I need to copy data to the third partition on that image file. I have seen things about a loop back device (which is fine) but then it talked about an offset parameter and I dont know what that is or more importantly what number to use. I hope I'm on the right track. How

Hi, I wanted to create a new btrfs fs for my backups. When trying to mkfs.btrfs for that device, I''m getting "error checking /dev/loop2 mount status" With strace I see where the problem is: lstat("/dev/disk/by-id/ata-INTEL_SSDSA2M160G2GC_CVPO939201JX160AGN-par", 0x7fffa30b3cf0) = -1 ENOENT (No such file or directory) The problem is there is something missing

Continuing on with my earlier post . . . after looking through code of JBD, is the following perhaps the difference in why the md5 values differ; When a journalled filesystem that uses jbd is mounted the journal b_count is incremented by one? *EVEN* if the volume was mounted read only, this b_count is still increased by one? curious as ever! lt __________________________________ Do you

I would like to pick the brains of the ZFS experts on this list: What would you do next to try and recover this zfs pool? I have a ZFS RAIDZ1 pool named bank0 that I cannot import. It was composed of 4 1.5 TiB disks. One disk is totally dead. Another had SMART errors, but using GNU ddrescue I was able to copy all the data off successfully. I have copied all 3 remaining disks as images using

Hi, I tried very promising btrfs to test it a little and I experienced a little bug in implementation. I''m not sure where the bug lies however this works quite well to reproduce the problem: dd if=/dev/zero of=mountme bs=4k count=100000 dd if=/dev/zero of=mountme2 bs=4k count=100000 mkfs.btrfs mountme mkfs.btrfs mountme2 mkdir loop loop2 mount -o loop mountme loop mount -o loop mountme

Hi, I have Xen 3.3.1 dom0 on Debian with 2.6.26-2-xen-amd64 kernel and I had to "xm destroy" my domU. Now when I try to start it again it fails like this: # xm list | grep n39 # # xm create -c /xen/conf/n39 Using config file "/xen/conf/n39". ROOT xen1:~> Error: Device 4 (vbd) could not be connected. losetup -r /dev/loop1 /xen/iso/amd64-netbsd-6.iso failed # losetup -a

Xen appears to kernel panic. Boot up terminates and hangs with the message "agpgart: Maximum main memory to use for agp memory: 152 M. " This is a compiled Xen-2.0 latest snapshot with agp support in the kernel. Has anyone else had similar problems with agp? Nate ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by: Sybase ASE Linux Express

Hallo, linux-btrfs, First I create an array of 2 disks with mkfs.btrfs -d raid0 -m raid1 /dev/sdb1 /dev/sdd1 and mount it at /srv/MM. Then I fill it with about 1,6 TByte. And then I add /dev/sde1 via btrfs device add /dev/sde1 /srv/MM btrfs filesystem balance /srv/MM (it run about 20 hours) Then I work on it, copy some new files, delete some old files - all works well. Only df

allow me to play someone with a fractional clue for the moment. What I want is a Gentoo based system that can run multiple virtual instances (maybe as many as 10 or 20) of a stock application configuration. My fantasy is that I will be able to build a single disk image for all of the basic OS and application to be shared between multiple virtual machines. Update that single core image using

Hi all, we are running two servers with Ubuntu 8.04 LTS Server with Xen 3.2 and two dual-core CPUs: processor : {0-3} vendor_id : AuthenticAMD cpu family : 15 model : 65 model name : Dual-Core AMD Opteron(tm) Processor 2218 HE stepping : 3 cpu MHz : 2613.394 cache size : 1024 KB physical id : 0 siblings : 1 core id : 0 cpu cores : 1 fpu :

Guys! Tomorrow in my "live" presentation at Linuxcon Xen Directions! I''ll show the Xen Live CD to the public! To celebrate! I want to share my last procedure to get and run Xen 4.0.1 on Ubuntu 10.04 64 bits, here we go: The procedure: 1- Install all the packages: aptitude update aptitude install bridge-utils build-essential libncurses5-dev dpkg-dev debhelper

# uname -a Linux dhcppc1 3.0.1-xxxx-std-ipv6-64 #1 SMP Sun Aug 14 17:06:21 CEST 2011 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux mkdir test5 cd test5 dd if=/dev/null of=img5 bs=1 seek=2G dd if=/dev/null of=img6 bs=1 seek=2G losetup /dev/loop2 img5 losetup /dev/loop3 img6 mkfs.btrfs -d raid1 -m raid1 /dev/loop2 /dev/loop3 btrfs device scan btrfs filesystem show Label: none uuid:

Hello to whom this may concern, Versioned this as I saw identical title before. I'm compiling a clang project where I'm seeing GVN mess up and replace a load with a wrong def value. I am using LLVM-3.5, but the problem has been observed upto 3.8. To illustrate the problem, define i32 @main scalar.ph: <initialize [80 x i16] %dest> ... preheader: %index=0 br test, loop1, bb2

On Mon, Sep 21, 2015 at 11:13 AM, Wei Mi <wmi at google.com> wrote: > I have the same worry as Philip and Hal that the new LoopExitValues > pass may increase some live range significantly in certain cases > because it reuses value cross outerloop iterations. Like the following > hypothetical case, the value reuse will create a live range living > across loop2, loop3, .... But

Thanks for quick reply Daniel, I tried to make a simple C testcase, but could not reproduce the same condition with output from Clang. I suppose I could modify the C code to make it look similar with TBAA's; I may be able to provide this by eod. > store %ptr above the load. My mistake; I was referring to the store $lcssa in bb2. Looking at the C source code, it should definitely alias

Fellow developers, I'm parallelizing loops to be called by pthread. The thread body that I pass to pthread_create looks like define i8* @loop1({ i32*, i32* }* nest %parent_frame, i8* %arg) parent_frame is pointer to shared variables in original function 0x00007f0de11c41f0: mov (%r10),%rax 0x00007f0de11c41f3: cmpl $0x63,(%rax) 0x00007f0de11c41f6: jg 0x7f0de11c420c

Hallo, linux-btrfs, please delete the option "-L" (for labelling) in "mkfs.btrfs", in some configurations it doesn''t work as expected. My usual way: mkfs.btrfs -d raid0 -m raid1 /dev/sdb /dev/sdc /dev/sdd ... One call for some devices. Wenn I add the option "-L mylabel" then each device gets the same label, and therefore some other programs