similar to: memory error?

Hi, Last week I discovered that my samba-server seems rather slow. When I searched around I discovered that I wasn't the only one experiencing this, but I didn't find a solution. I experimented a little, and I hope someone can suggest a solution. First my server : SuSE 8.1, with Samba 2.2.5 (comes with the distribution). From a WinME-client I uploaded a 160Mb file to the samba-server.

Hi List, I am running a x86_64 Centos server, after a reboot the network has decided to not work.. this particular machine has 8 eth ports eth0-7. eth0 and eth3 were bonded (mode 1 ) after reboot the bond did not work. It came up OK but no data was passing through it. all other interfaces on the machine were working. I decided to remove the bond, so after removing the bond i was left with eth0

I've got a pair of identical CentOS 6.7 servers, with SuperMicro X8DTE-F motherboards, these have 2 each Intel 82574L ethernet ports. The eth0 ports are plugged in with 10' runs of brand new cat 5e cable to a Cisco Nexxus 9000 switch (provided by the data center). These servers keep coming up at 100baseT rather than gigE. I've swapped ports and cables with a different server,

Hi! Maybe, I found a bug of xen. My system: - domain0 - gentoo - xen-devel-3.0, kernel 2.6.12.5-r1 - domain1 - debian - kernel 2.6.12.5-r1 (2 interface: vif1.1 = eth0 (0.0.0.0), vif1.2 = eth1 (10.0.1.1 + gw 10.0.1.2)) Bridge: xen-br0 (config as 10.0.1.2) include (vif1.2, vif0.0) xen-br1 (config as 0.0.0.0) include (vif1.1, peth0) On server domain1 I use a pppoe server. If a send a pppoe request

Dear colleagues, experimenting with new amd64-based router we found strange re(4) behaviour when working in autoselect media mode: whenever promisc mode turned on, renegotiating occurs, leading to 3 to 45 (depending on STP settings on the switch) network unavailability. Moreover, some other re(4) setting changes seem to disturb link state unneededly (such as ifconfig re0 -vlanhwtag) The most

Howdy: This is (at least slightly) off-topic, but I've seen more knowledgeable folks than I mention autonegotiation in this venue and, since I didn't get any response on the vortex-bugs mailing list, I thought I'd ask here (also, the interface in question supports samba so...). And there should be some good news for some folks too. If this is old news, sorry (I've been too busy

Hello everybody! Spse I have the following X <- seq(1:100) #(a dim(100) sequence of integers 1:100 representing the possible actions of player 1 and player2 in a game) BR2X<- br2(X) #(a dim(100) sequence of points on range (1,100) representing the best response function of player 2 to player 1:s actions) BR1X<- br1(X) #(a dim(100) sequence of points on range (1,100)

On 10/10/2016 09:31 PM, John R Pierce wrote: > > oh. Yeah, the entire "net-tools" package is deprecated. I tend to forget which of the two (ethtool or mii-tool) is in that set. # Avoid using any of these: $ rpm -ql net-tools

Hi all, I have one bridge system (used for controlling bandwidth) connected to three different DSL ISP provider. I have the following setup below: - +-------------+ | br0 | | -> eth1 | -> DSL_1 | -> eth2 | +-------------+ | br1 | | -> eth3 | -> DSL_2 | -> eth4 | +-------------+ | br2 | | -> eth5

Folks, I'm fairly new to this whole Linux UPS thingie, but I'd quite like to have a look at getting my UPS to work under Linux and would be grateful for any help in getting a driver. I have a reasonable working knowledge of Linux and software development, and thus am happy to modify config files, alter kernel settings, etc, although I'm no C guru. I have a Kebo UPS-650D, which

Hello, I have a problem with connecting a Digium X100P card to a Brazilian analog line. Can somebody help me out with this problem? My /etc/zaptel.conf is loadzone=br defaultzone=br fxsks=1 My /etc/asterisk/indications.conf [general] country=br [br] description = Brazil ringcadance = 1000,4000 dial = 425 busy = 425/250,0/250 ring = 425/1000,0/4000 congestion =

Dear Xen community, I have Xen 3.0 installed on RedHat Linux Enterprise RHEL4U2. "xend install" runs fine with no error messages. However, when I start "xm cr guest-vmx.conf" I do not get any new window open for the new guest OS. "xm list" shows that the vmx has started and seems to be working fine (just for testing, when I type "xterm" an X window

I'm looking for some information regarding the interaction of KVM, VLANs, firewalld, and the kernel's forwarding configuration. I would appreciate input especially from anyone already running a similar configuration in production. In short, I'm trying to figure out if a current configuration is inadvertently opening up traffic across network segments. On earlier versions of CentOS

Hi, I have this scenario Cisco 5300 (public ip. 200.47.xx.xx) <---> Asterisk (public ip: 64.76.xx.xx) <--> Cisco 3600 (public ip: 64.76.xx.xx , same network than * ) When a calls comes in Cisco 5300, this send this calls with SIP to *, asterisk plays a welcome message and resend call to Cisco 3600 that have 4 analog lines connected... but after cisco play welcome message and when

Hi all, I need help. I have a Linux box with SER as a proxy server with ip phones attached on it , and another linux box with Asterisk and T410 card connect to an E1 line .Whenever there is a call from PSTN it is passed to Asterisk and then to SER box and then to the phone .every time an invalid number dialed from PSTN to SIP phones connected to SER asterisk says that the call is progressing

How much of an impact can/does local network traffic have on call quality? Would opening large files on local servers affect call quality? We are running QoS on the router but that will only prioritize traffic in/out of the network.

Running CentOS 5.4 x64. Have successfully bridged eth2 with br2 by following the instructions here: http://wiki.libvirt.org/page/Networking (under the RHEL section) Have been running several KVM VMs successfully via this bridge. I am now trying to bridge additional interfaces by using the same routine. Each bridge is named to correspond with the ethX device its bridged with. Example of

I give up and need help! I won''t add to the confusion by showing all the combinations I have tried unsuccessfully... and yes, I''ve read FAQ2 and FAQ2a many times! When googling the subject of this post there are many answers that boil down to using the same three iptables rules, two of which use nat. I won''t repeat them here. I don''t want to risk mixing

Hello, i have a server with 2 public ips on 2 devices. I want that the request of incoming traffic dont use the default gateway. Incoming traffic sould be answered using the gateway of the incoming device Could i realize this with firewalld? Or directly iptables? Greeting J

Hi, I have servers where shorewall6 won''t reject nor log: # cat /etc/shorewall6/zones fw firewall net ipv6 # cat /etc/shorewall6/interfaces net eth1 tcpflags (I also tried without "tcpflags", but no changes) # cat /etc/shorewall6/policy $FW all ACCEPT all all REJECT info # cat /etc/shorewall6/rules SECTION NEW (for testing, I removed all the rules) I am testing from