similar to: Rails Prod Win 0.2

Hi all, as part of adopting Rails in my company I had to go through the hassle of setting up a Rails production environment on Win32 system since we mostly use MS SQL as our database back end and also because we mostly dealing with customers who become green-blue-purple as soon as you mention Unix/Linux and run for the door. I also need to mention that most of our web applications are internal and

This might be obvious to everyone but it is something that i haven''t been able to find an answer to. Do I need to have either scgi/fastcgi/cgi running on either lighttpd/apache for ruby scripts to work? If yes, why? I have installed the scgi server and i can get the service to run, i have also installed the following mod_fastcgi/2.4.2 mod_ruby/1.2.4 Ruby/1.8.2(2004-12-25) mod_scgi,

I am running (testing) a noob-tube for myself as follows: Windows XP SP2 lighty ruby 1.8.x rails 1.1 scgi I have everything working fairly well, but with one minor exception: the actions that I have defined as follows are not found. class MytestController < ApplicationController def index render_text "Hello Nurse!" end def dilbert render_text "Dilbert

Hi all, I wonder if it''s possible to retrieve the current controller name and possibly the action when you''re in a view. i.e. I call the same template/partial view from different controllers and I''d like to know when I''m in the view code which controller is calling it... Any ideas? Sorry if it''s obvious but I couldn''t find it in the doc.

Hi all, I''ve been looking for these for quite some time now and I couldn''t find them with a transparent background and a neutral color, so here they are, just baked from the oven: The Mac OS X and Mozilla Spinners (Grayscal and Transparent) Enjoy Gael -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: spinner_mac.gif Type: image/gif Size: 2530

I just switched my rails app over to production mode, couldn''t get it working, switched it back to development mode, and now nothing gets outputted in the browser. I''m sure I''ve missed something in the configs. Setup: Lighttpd/SCGI on WinXP, Rails 1.0. Environment.rb: ENV[''RAILS_ENV''] ||= ''development'' require

hi i have probably hit every error possible problem on windows while trying to setup ruby on Lighty with mysql and ajax support, i''m leaving mysql see(minor issue with mysql/ruby - major headache) for now and moving onto AJAX, |webrickwall| not that easy i''ve tried my app on lighty and i get the following error in the logfile and no ajax response

All, I have all of the components that I need to install RoR under FCGI for Apache 1.3.34. I have: mod_fcgi 2.4.2 fcgi 2.4.0 (developer''s kit) ruby-fcgi-0.8.6 I am comfortable up to the point of installing mod_fcgi, however, I don''t understand how fcgi and ruby-fcgi will be used by mod_fcgi. How does mod_fcgi connect to fcgi and ruby-fcgi. I assume that there are

I am trying to run instant rails on windows xp SP2. I can get the cookbook and typo sample sites to work with webrick but not with scgi. When i click the start with scgi i get a blank dos window and typing www.mycookbook.com returns Firefox can''t establish a connection to the server at www.mycookbook.com. This suggests that apache is not even running even though the green light is

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 I am looking to set up a CentOS server for hosting a high traffic PHP site (specifically Drupal 6). I am trying to figure out what's the best way of setting up PHP. The standard mod_php seems to not be a good solution, as it requires apache to be in the prefork configuration, due to PHP not being thread safe. Something like mod_fcgi seems to be

Hello Everyone, Today''s Mongrel is the first release to sport spiffy pre-built win32 gems. This comes thanks to Wilson Bilkovich donating some Rakefile magic that does the stuff for me. Everyone who uses win32 should send Wilson a thank-you since without him you''d be a victim of my laziness for at least a few more weeks. People who are testing and trying Mongrel out should

I think most of us would expect prod(0:1000) to return 0, and ... ... it does. However, many of us also expect prod(x1, x2) to be equivalent to prod(c(x1,x2)) the same as we can expect that for min(), max(), sum() and such members of the "Summary" group. Consequently, prod(0, 1:1000) should also return 0, but as you see, it gives NaN which may be a bit puzzling... The

Hi please help, Id like to get SCGI working with rails. having gone through the instruction its seems straight forward enough, but for one slight snag. mod_scgi.so the one I downloaded seems to be for DOS. no problem, I just download the source and comile it for Solaris, oh oh for some reason it doesn''t compile. So I decided to search the web for a binarie version for Solaris 10

Regardless of the value of the other arguments, the first element in the output of seq() is _always_ `from`. Hadley On Mon, Jun 15, 2015 at 9:56 AM, Millot Gael <Gael.Millot at curie.fr> wrote: > Thanks for your answer. > > The rational behind my proposal is why taking "from" when length.out=1, more than "to" or "NA", or " integer(0) " ?

I am attempting to get Rails running on Windows with an Apache 2 server. I seem to be having some trouble, and in spite of my best efforts to find a solution, I could not. I believe that I configured Apache correctly. I have included EnableSendfile Off EnableMMAP Off Win32DisableAcceptEx FastCgiConfig -maxClassProcesses 1 -maxProcesses 1 -minProcesses 1 -processSlack 1 \ -initial-env

Millot, On Mon, Jun 15, 2015 at 9:19 AM, Hadley Wickham <h.wickham at gmail.com> wrote: > Regardless of the value of the other arguments, the first element in > the output of seq() is _always_ `from`. > Indeed, as Hadley says, the output of seq must always start with* from*. It is a sequence starting at *from* and ending wherever the other arguments cause it to end. A sequence

Looking for more ways to speed up R, I've found that large improvements are possible in the speed of "sum" and "prod" for long real vectors. Here is a little test with R version 2.11.1 on an Intel Linux system > a <- seq(0,1,length=1000) > system.time({for (i in 1:1000000) b <- sum(a)}) user system elapsed 4.800 0.010 4.817 > system.time({for (i

Thanks for your answer. The rational behind my proposal is why taking "from" when length.out=1, more than "to" or "NA", or " integer(0) " ? This question seems basic. But is is not in certain situations, like when length.out = unpredictable positive integer. And I haven't found in ?seq() the particular behavior of this function when length.out = 1.

is it by design? is it standard? how do you give users multiple actions on a form? -- Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.

On 2023-04-15 6:00 am, r-devel-request at r-project.org wrote: > Date: Fri, 14 Apr 2023 13:38:00 +0300 > From: Ivan Krylov<krylov.r00t at gmail.com> > To:r-devel at r-project.org > Subject: [Rd] sum(), min(), max(), prod() vs. named arguments in ... Message-ID: <20230414133800.75383dae-6792 at arachnoid> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" > >