similar to: css for textile/redcloth?

I''m just getting into RedCloth and am struggling a bit with using the pre and code tags. Why do I need to use both? Is there a tag or way for me to extend RedCloth to always use both pre and code with just one tag? -- Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.

For a community project I aim to combine RedCloth and Coderay and on doing this, I might have found an issue with RedCloth. I pushed a demo to Github: https://github.com/markusproske/redcloth_coderay_demo The index (http://localhost:3000/) demonstrates the issue. In brief: A page consist of textile. The textile contains @@@ruby somecode @@@ The textile is first feed into Coderay via a helper

Hello, I would like to enable html breaks when having newlines in my text rendered using textile/redcloth. I have found that a property names hard_breaks should be enabled but I''m not sure where (in which file). Anyone with a hint? :-) Greetings, Gitte Wange

Hi, I''m using RedCloth right now for some simple markup in a Rails project. It''s simple and easy - thanks for a great tool! I have a question about an apparent discrepancy between RedCloth and Textile, relating to newline characters. I''ve played with the "hard_breaks" feature and that seems to generate it''s own problems.. If I go onto the Textile

Has anybody gotten :hard_breaks to work with RedCloth? I''m doing: self.body_html = RedCloth.new(self.body).to_html(:textile) which works, except that it doesn''t transform hard breaks to <br /> tags, which is really important for me. However, if I do: self.body_html = RedCloth.new(self.body, [ :hard_breaks ]).to_html(:textile) then it converts ALL breaks into <br

Hi, I have several hundred pages of text, all carefully marked up with textile, which I use redcloth to convert to html for display. Now I find I need all these pages to alternatively output plain text - ie. A-Za-z0-9 and simple punctuation only. Any suggestions on the best way to do this? My only thought is to let redcloth do its stuff, and then strip out the html tags - but it feels wrong.

1) Is there a way to strip a redcloth string of all redcloth tags? I need to display a snippet of the text in an index page and want all markings removed. I used RedCloth.new(''a'').methods but didn''t find anything appropriate. For now, I''m converting to html then stripping tags. 2) what''s the best practice in term of storing user''s redcloth-

I''m using RedCloth for a forum type app. I want users to have control over the look of their posts, but within limits. For example, I don''t want them to be able to include images or use header tags. The RedCloth documentation is pretty thin and I don''t feel it''s very explanatory. I''m wondering if there''s any easy way to do this? Or do I

how do you install this? especially on rails 3? putting gem "redcloth", :git => "git://github.com/ROFISH/redcloth.git" doesn''t work. and do nested tags like [quote][quote][/quote][/quote] work? -- Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.

Hi, I use textilize() which is a great way of letting end users edit contents. But the code in RedCloth is quite compact, and doesn''t allow for easily adding correct typographic behaviour depending on the lang of the text. For instance, correct quoting uses round double quotes in english and double carons ? ? in french; the spaces before punctuation can be corrected too. I''d

If a user enters the Textile-based code for an image, say: !>graphic.png! the textile() method will successfully render a right-float image. Now, if I want to escape the user''s text using h(), the ''>'' is turned into an &amp;. Obviously, the image then fails to render in a browser. Is there a work around for this? I guess what I''m really asking

I've been looking at Dean Allen's Redcloth, which claims to incorporate both Markdown and Textile, as implemented in Ruby by _why. While the code is clear and readable, the boundary between markdown and Textile is not. The documentation says # By default, Redcloth uses both Textile and Markdown formatting, with # Textile formatting taking precedence. If you want to turn off Markdown #

Hi all! I am trying tu set up RedCloth for user-submitted comments. And here is my problem. The :filter_html option just breaks images :-( For example, if I try in irb: string= "Some textile !agif.gif! and textile again" RedCloth.new(string, [:filter_html, :filter_styles]).to_html(:textile) I get: NoMethodError: You have a nil object when you didn''t expect it! The error

Hello, Is there a patch laying around somewhere to convert Textile to LaTeX? (Instiki did/does this?) Or, better yet, is RedCloth 3.1 still in the pipeline? In ruby-talk 129874 (7 Feb 2005), why the lucky stiff wrote: > > Let me give you a roadmap of what to expect with RedCloth 3 > in the coming months. > > RedCloth 3.1 will focus on getting us diverse outputs.

Hi, I''m using textilize with redcloth 3.0.4. Everything works best except that paragraphs are not translated as an HTML paragraph When I write something like: *first paragraph* second paragraph the output is without paragraph: *first paragraph* second paragraph Any help??? Thanks Jörg

Is this the prefered method to implement RedCloth in your views. I''m trying to display user input that will sometimes have code references in it. This strips out all tags. I would like for the tags to be displayed but not read as html. Thanks in advance! <%= RedCloth.new(strip_tags(comment.comment),[:filter_html]).to_html %> charlie bowman recentrambles.com -- Posted via

I''d like to extend bleucloth or redcloth to support custom tags, e.g. I want to use markup like this: [pubmed:18332676] which shall be extended to: <a href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18332676">Behav Pharmacol. 2008 Mar;19(2):121-128.</a> Does anyone know, if this is possible and has some hints how to do this?! I have not decided, wether I want to use

Hi, I''ve been using the rassmalog static blogging engine and have encountered a stack overflow inside the redcloth regexp matcher. I don''t seem to suffer this error on my Ubuntu (Feisty Fawn) box (with Ruby 1.8.4??), but I do get it on my Gentoo system. Running the following line will generate it (I''ve attached the YAML/redcloth file to this message). $ ruby -ryaml

Hello, I am in a bit of a bind. I need to reliably parse mediawiki markup to html, and the only parser that I can find (mediacloth) has a lot to be desired, so I would like to extend something that works and parse mediawiki markup. My question to this list is should I start working on RedCloth or SuperRedCloth or is there a difference as far as extending them? Also does anyone know of a write up

I have the newest version of RedCloth installed (3.0.4). I want the following output: <h1>Header</h1> <p>Some text</p> This is what I tried but no luck: irb(main):002:0> require ''rubygems'' => true irb(main):004:0> require_gem ''RedCloth'' => true irb(main):006:0> RedCloth.new("h1. Header\r\nSome Text").to_html