similar to: Formating Float ActiveRecord attributes in text inputs

Can someone explain why form helpers appear to bypass any model methods I override for fields that are bound to database fields? It would be great if someone could tell me how to force the form field, etc to call the method instead of looking at the database / attributes collection. Let''s say I have a column called ''price'' in my database table "books"

I have in my view the following: <% 0.upto(@num_performances) do |idx| -%> <%= text_field ''performance'', ''city'', :index => idx, %> <%= text_field ''performance'', ''venue'', :index => idx, %> <% end -%> and in my controller I have: @performance = [Performance.new("city" =>

Hi everybody, I need to find out all terms (field values) from one of the fields from a set of documents returned by search. In other words, I have indexed documents with two fields. I do search on one field and then want to know all other field''s values from fount documents. How? -- Sergei Serdyuk Red Leaf Software LLC web: http://redleafsoft.com -- Posted via

Hi, I am on Ferret 0.9.3 and it seems to me that Ferret::Analysis::PerFieldAnalyzerWrapper is not available in ferret_ext. -- Sergei Serdyuk Red Leaf Software LLC web: http://redleafsoft.com -- Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.

I am wondering why is in creating text fields with form_helper used value_before_type_cast instead of attribute value for field value? I set rails enviroment so date fields are in european format (dd.mm.yyyy) and would like to have same format in forms, but because of value_before_type_cast is called, form fields are filled with ''yyyy-mm-dd'' or timestamp integer, etc.

Hi I have a problem accessing an array field in a Postgresql database. Here is the table definition. View "neil.flashing_codes" Column | Type | Modifiers -------------+-----------------------+----------- code | character varying(10) | description | text | folds | integer[] | View definition: SELECT

I am a bit puzzled. I am having issues with memory leaking away. It seems to be related to searching documents by ''id'' column value. This is what I am doing: cached_annotations = Ferret::Index::Index.new(:path => "#{RAILS_ROOT}/db/ferret/tmp/annotations", :auto_flush => false) 100000.times { |x| doc=cached_annotations[x.to_s] } Every 100000.times eats 100MB

Hi, I am seeing that doc = index[''mykey''] index.update ''mykey'', doc is about 10 times slower than doc = Document.new doc[''id''] = ''mykey'' index << doc It looks like #update is _much_ slower that #<<. Is it as expected? Sergei. -- Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.

Hi, Is there a way to log RJS output in development.log? Thank you. -- Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.

Hi, This does not seem to be covered anywhere. Since base class extends ActiveRecord with a table that has fields for all heirs, would that mean that any heir class can access any of those attributes, including ones that belong to other heirs? Or I am missing something? -- Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.

On Sat, Aug 15, 2020 at 8:39 PM Martin Storsjö <martin at martin.st> wrote: > Hi, > > > On Sat, 15 Aug 2020, Ivan Serdyuk wrote: > > > Just as Shoaib said, libunwind only is useful in environments > > that use > > the Itanium C++ ABI - there's really no use for it in an MSVC > > context > > (either using MSVC or

Hi All, I have a Ferret index containing some cached RSS feeds. I have a nightly cron script to cache the feeds, and I''d like to update the index with the latest feeds. I see the Index class has an update method, but I can''t work out how to get the id of the relevant document to pass in. Lets say I have a file called "google_news.xml" I want to go:

I have a table with "expires_on" a DATE field. "Show" and "Destroy" work, but "Edit" errors: /usr/local/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/actionpack-1.11.2/lib/action_view/helpers/date_helper.rb:150:in `select_hour'' /usr/local/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/actionpack-1.11.2/lib/action_view/helpers/date_helper.rb:149:in `select_hour'' It only happens when

(this is my first post on the ruby forum. If this is not the right place for this type of question please let me know). Ajax question I have a checkbox that toggles the visibility of another element (a text field) with the code: --- <p><label for="checkbox">Appear!</label> <%= check_box :object_name, :method, :onClick =>

Hi, >From looking at Ruby sources it seems that every update method deletes and reinserts documents. It makes sense if indexed fields are changed but what if it is not the case? It would speed up update a lot indexes did not have to be updated twice for nothing. Any quick way to do it? -- Sergei Serdyuk Red Leaf Software LLC web: http://redleafsoft.com -- Posted via

Hi all I''m working on a Custom Formbuilder. I want it to create me with a single method call checkboxes for a given HABTM association. My model looks like this: [code=ruby]class Member < ActiveRecord::Base has_and_belongs_to_many :preferred_music_styles, :class_name => ''MusicStyle'', :join_table =>

Martin, good to hear from you. Thanks for the effort - I will test on 32bit and 64bit Windows 10. I will report ASAP. Ivan On Sun, Aug 16, 2020 at 8:42 PM Martin Storsjö <martin at martin.st> wrote: > On Sat, 15 Aug 2020, Ivan Serdyuk wrote: > > > > > > > On Sat, Aug 15, 2020 at 8:39 PM Martin Storsjö <martin at martin.st> wrote: > > Hi, > >

Hi, i have some issues with the default rails error wrapping. It wraps errors in a div with class ''fieldsWithError'', which is not good practice in my eyes. Adding a class ''error'' to the field would be much nicer. My solution to the problem: build your own FormBuilder. Funny enough, i found no (nice) possibility to switch error wrapping off while using the

Hi Facebookers, Is there a helper or suggested approach for presenting validation errors on an fbml form? Something to translate rails error markup to fbml:error markup? thanks Joel

Hi ActionView::Helpers::FormHelper methods (e.g. #text_field, #check_box...) take object_name as an argument. From this argument they infer a name that is supposed to contains the reference to the relevant object. I can''t see why the FormHelper methods were designed that way. Compared to simply passing them a reference, the current way seems too complicated and an invitation to problems