similar to: [Announce] Samba 3.5.9 Available for Download

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 1000 matches similar to: "[Announce] Samba 3.5.9 Available for Download"

2005 Sep 05
3
An alternate "dovecot-auth" daemon using cyrus-sasl
We use dovecot in a heterogeneous environment (Windows/Linux desktops and Linux servers). For unified authentication we use a sheaf "Samba/Openldap" (i.e., Samba NT domain with openldap backend and pam/nss_ldap for Linux). Windows users are authenticated well everywhere, but there is one old issue. As "SPA" (NTLM) against NT domain is not supported by dovecot, it is
2007 Jul 02
2
[Patch] Samba's proposed "ntlm_auth + winbind" support for dovecot-auth
The Samba team recommends to use their "ntlm_auth" command line helper for "NTLM" and "GSS-SPNEGO" authentication. This helper interacts with the Samba's winbind daemon, and this way can authenticate users against NT or Active Directory windows domain. Currently Dovecot can do "NTLM" authentication too, but just "locally" (against a local
2007 Aug 07
1
v1.1.alpha2 released
http://dovecot.org/releases/1.1/alpha/dovecot-1.1.alpha2.tar.gz http://dovecot.org/releases/1.1/alpha/dovecot-1.1.alpha2.tar.gz.sig Hopefully the next release can be v1.1.beta1. I'm not aware of any major problems and I think I'm pretty much done with new features (except for dbox). The largest changes since alpha1: * Removed THREAD indexing. It's a bit buggy and I think
2011 Sep 02
0
GPFS and Windows file attributes
I was reviewing the GPFS VFS module this afternoon after I had a request to add Thumbs.db to the hide files option. Now I was under the impression that the GPFS VFS module mapped this through to the Windows attributes on the under lying file system. That is assuming that your GPFS file system is sufficiently recent to support Windows attributes. I did some experimentations with a Terminal
2011 Jul 08
3
Upgrading from 3.0.37 to 3.5.9
I am upgrading from 3.0.37 to 3.5.9 on the same server and need some advice. I am running Solaris 10 on a domain server that services 10 XP and Win 7 clients. The existing Samba directory structure is not standard. I believe the engineer who built the Solaris install transferred all Samba 2.0 directories from the old server to the current server and then created additional directories for the
2016 May 18
2
SGID bit not obeyed in 4.3.9?
> On May 18, 2016, at 2:38 PM, Rowland penny <rpenny at samba.org> wrote: > > On 18/05/16 19:44, Smith, Jarrod A wrote: >> We just upgraded to 4.3.9 (from 4.1.x) and are experiencing a few issues/differences around permissions on files written from Windows clients authenticated from winbind/AD. One specific issue that we have is directories with permissions like: >>
2017 Jun 19
1
Bit SGID on directories
Hello,   I have a samba server v4.6.5, it’s a member of a Windows 2003 domain.   I setup a share, in this share I want to set sgid bit on directories. I created a directory with SGID bit on the top of the share, but when I create inside new directories didn’t have SGID bits.   Here is my smb.conf :   [global] use sendfile = no gpfs:getrealfilename = no smb ports = 445 139 dos charset =
2011 Jul 13
1
Samba 3.5.9 with Windows 2008 R2
Hi All, We're going to upgrade our DCs to Windows 2008 R2 native mode soon, so we're facing with the challenge that how to get our samba servers (Solaris 8 & Solaris 10) work with Windows 2008 R2 native mode. I've compiled Samba 3.5.9 with AD support. Then I installed and configured the binaries on my 3 test machines (one Solaris 8 and two Solaris 10). The strange problem is one
2016 May 18
0
SGID bit not obeyed in 4.3.9?
On 18/05/16 21:18, Smith, Jarrod A wrote: >> On May 18, 2016, at 2:38 PM, Rowland penny <rpenny at samba.org> wrote: >> >> On 18/05/16 19:44, Smith, Jarrod A wrote: >>> We just upgraded to 4.3.9 (from 4.1.x) and are experiencing a few issues/differences around permissions on files written from Windows clients authenticated from winbind/AD. One specific issue that
2016 May 18
2
SGID bit not obeyed in 4.3.9?
We just upgraded to 4.3.9 (from 4.1.x) and are experiencing a few issues/differences around permissions on files written from Windows clients authenticated from winbind/AD. One specific issue that we have is directories with permissions like: drwxrws---+ 9 myapp 9997 2048 May 16 17:38 . It's owned by user "myapp" and GID 9997 and as you can see we have the SGID bit set on this
2013 Oct 08
1
Address family not supported by protocol
I've compile a Samba 4.0.9 for x86_64 with the following options: CPPFLAGS="-D_LARGEFILE64_SOURCE -D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64 -D_GNU_SOURCE -march=atom -O2 -pipe -fomit-frame-pointer" \ samba_cv_HAVE_GETTIMEOFDAY_TZ=yes \ samba_cv_HAVE_IFACE_IFCONF=yes \ samba_cv_HAVE_IFACE_IFREQ=yes \ ac_cv_have_setresuid=yes \ ac_cv_have_setresgid=yes \ ac_cv_file__proc_sys_kernel_core_pattern=yes \
2011 Aug 06
1
3.5.9: logon scripts are not working under non root user
I have issues running logon script on samba 3.5.9 (freebsd 8.2p1) under non root user. When i login to the XP box under root all is OK. logon script is working, but it's totally not working under all other users. turning on debugging reveals that under non root it's incorrectly parsing the logon script name from config (adding full network path to filename) unix_convert called on file
2008 Aug 26
3
ZFS automatic snapshots 0.11 Early Access
Hi all, I''ve just pushed some of the changes coming up in 0.11 hg clone ssh://anon at hg.opensolaris.org/hg/jds/zfs-snapshot I''ve got some commentary on the Early Access nature of this release at: http://blogs.sun.com/timf/entry/zfs_automatic_snapshots_0_11 Comments (and bug reports) welcome! cheers, tim
2015 May 26
5
Clients unable to get group policy...
Sorry for the delay, I have been out of town. Your hunch was correct, Rowland. Both getent and id only return local machine accounts, not domain accounts. What have I overlooked which would cause this? I do have winbind in my PAM configuration. James, it has worked for a few years. It recently (in the last year) started having workstations report being unable to access the gpt.ini files. The
2009 Mar 03
11
Fw: Re: Problems with load the most recent 2.6.29-rc6 & Xen unstable on ASUS P5K Premium
>I probably shouldn''t have been operating machinery yesterday. >The crash is probably because I committed the e820 memory rearranging >stuff into the wrong branch, but something may have broken us from >tip/master as well. >   J Kernel was already broken at 2/28/09 --- On Sat, 2/28/09, Marc - A. Dahlhaus <mad@wol.de> wrote: From: Marc - A. Dahlhaus
2015 May 29
0
Clients unable to get group policy...
hai, add this to your smb.conf of the DC. ##---- disable printing completely load printers = no printing = bsd printcap name = /dev/null disable spoolss = yes and gone are your errors about printing. Greetz, Louis >-----Oorspronkelijk bericht----- >Van: ryana at reachtechfp.com >[mailto:samba-bounces at lists.samba.org] Namens Ryan Ashley
2011 Jun 21
0
Building Samba 3.5.9 on Solaris 10
I wanted to build samba with CUPS and LDAP support, and put it into a location from where it can be automounted by other systems. There were a few gotchas I solved the hard way, to save anyone else's time, this is what I did. C compiler I used is Sun's Studio. Solaris sed behaves differently to Sunfreeware sed tolka source3 $ echo libwbclient.so.0|/usr/local/bin/sed
2011 Sep 15
0
force group behaviour changed in 3.5.9
Hi list, beginning with samba 3.5.9, the behaviour or effects of the "force group" parameter changed. The change is that with my config I can create new files on the share but I can no longer delete (or rename) those files. With 3.5.8, I could create and delete them. The setup is as follows: [webshare] path = /webshare force group = www create mask = 0664
1998 Nov 03
4
nis homedir troubles
Sorry if this is an old problem. I have just installed 1.9.18p10 - the latest version. I noticed the nis homedir option in the config file, but have not had much luck in implementing it. I had hoped it would mean my [homes] shares would map to the correct server - the one which physically carries a users home directory - regardless of the machine to which the connection attempt was made. My
2010 May 07
0
ACL madness
Hello list, I'm having a "fun" time trying to figure out my ACL problems. I've gone through the default ACL settings and the mask settings on the filesystem to ensure that the user I am using does indeed have access to the filesystem that is being shared out. My issue is that I am unable to overwrite a file that already exists with another file of the same name. I get the