similar to: [Announce] Samba 3.4.11 Available for Download

Hai, maybe it's a bit early to ask, but is there a date when 3.2.2 wil be released. thanx. Louis

Hi list members, i run a Debian etch system. I upgrade my samba to the sernet deb packages. All runs fine but i have a error message with SWAT. If i open swat in browser it tells: ERROR: Can't open include/header.html It is only a white background in my browser and i can?t open help files. I think there is a link missing to a folder? Right? But where is the place ?????? Who can help??

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hey folks, fyi: The planned release date for Samba 3.2.8 is February 03, 2009. Karolin - -- Samba http://www.samba.org SerNet http://www.sernet.de sambaXP http://www.sambaxp.org -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.9 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAklsVa0ACgkQKGi9fisXk1G+XwCfTKWiARlspK6dFKaSBpPCe5W1 PAcAnRLbGFF1ANS0qTmpSZRQ26PeEAvQ

Dear list, I compiled Samba 3.2.0 document like this. cd samba-3.2.0/source configure ... ... ... cd ../docs-xml make all but some error happen. --------------------------------- # make all ... ... xsltproc --output output/manpages-3/eventlogadm.8 xslt/man.xsl tmp/manpages-3/eventlogadm.8.xml runtime error: file xslt/man.xsl line 41 element if unregistered variable list-indent

Hello, I use Debian Squeeze with Samba 3.5.6. I do experience problems that might be related to those described in bug 7892 that can be found found here: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7892 I could not find any information about this bug being fixed in Samba 3.5.x. In the realease notes of Samba 3.4.10 I found this: '* BUG 7892: Fix stale lock in open_file_fchmod().' As

** Low Priority ** Hi Volker, This is regarding your fix on recycled PIDs. I am an NCP developer from Novell and we use libsmbsharemodes library from Samba for Cross Protocols Locks between NCP, Samba and others. I have few queries regarding your fix. In your fix, you have added a new field called 'unique_id' in the server_id structure and we need to pass this in our call to samba

Hi all, anybody of you having a working samba.spec for RHEL4 or RHEL5? thanks a lot, christian ___________________________________________________________ Christian Masopust SIEMENS AG SIS PSE TMF Tel: +43 (0) 5 1707 26866 E-mail: christian.masopust@siemens.com Addr: Austria, 1210 Vienna, Siemensstra?e 90-92, B. 33, Rm. 243 Leader of

Release Announcements ===================== Samba 3.5.7, 3.4.12 and 3.3.15 are security releases in order to address CVE-2011-0719. o CVE-2011-0719: All current released versions of Samba are vulnerable to a denial of service caused by memory corruption. Range checks on file descriptors being used in the FD_SET macro were not present allowing stack corruption. This can cause the

Release Announcements ===================== Samba 3.5.7, 3.4.12 and 3.3.15 are security releases in order to address CVE-2011-0719. o CVE-2011-0719: All current released versions of Samba are vulnerable to a denial of service caused by memory corruption. Range checks on file descriptors being used in the FD_SET macro were not present allowing stack corruption. This can cause the

Hello, maybe there is someone they can help and answer a question why i get these network screen on my ctdb clusters. I have two ctdb clusters. One physical and one in a vmware enviroment. So when i transfer any files (copy) in a samba share so i get such network curves with performance breaks. I dont see that the transfer will stop but why is that so? can i change anything or does anybody know

Hi Volker, It would be useful if your 3.3.9 build (currently in recent) included the /var/spool/samba directory - it just took me a while to figure out why Samba printing wasn't working on a new EL5 server ;-) Moray. "To err is human.? To purr, feline"

My name is Kenji Ichinoseki and I am in charge of a project at Sumitomo Electric Networks, Inc. Please give me cooperation by all means about the affair in the account of a title. Now, I included "Samba 3.0.37" in the Linux system currently developed (us). And it is testing using "smbtorture(samba3.5.8 source4) ". The point in question was found in our entry of this test. It

<<[Samba] [ANNOUNCE] Samba 3.2.1 Available for Download.eml>> ********* *BEGIN ENCRYPTED or SIGNED PART* ********* Michael Adam wrote: > That is right: the link creation in source/bin is fixed, > but the installation of the links is still broken. > > It _is_ fixed in the v3-3-test branch which will be used for > 3.3.0 (scheduled for December). The changes to the Make

I am trying to set up a caching link between two points, that can be shared with windows and *nix. In both locations, I have linux-based servers with data, which have caching NFS mounts (that is, mount -t nfs -o fsc, with cachefilesd). These mounts are working correctly and I have tested the cache locally to much success. What I have not been able to get working is sharing those mounts with

I'm running a PDC on Samba 3.60. Just freshly upgraded it from Samba 3.028a with the purpose of supporting Windows 7. However though all the existing users and computers are running fine, I'm stumped trying to join a new Windows 7 machine to it. I have applied the DomainCompatibility registry fix. When I try to join a Windows 7 workstation I will get this message : The join operation

Hello, Can someone help me to track down the source of this problem? I'm trying to access a file server running on a Belkin modem with an attached USB drive. Judging my the quality of the firmware on the device, I'd say there's a good chance of it being buggy. But it works well enough on a Windows machine, even one running inside Virtualbox under Linux. I therefore see no reason

On Wed, Feb 11, 2015 at 10:27:50AM +0100, Nacho del Rey wrote: > Hi Volker and the list > > Yesterday the problem appeared again > > I could launch a strace command over a samba PID to see what was going on > and this is the result > > [PRO] [root at pf3il0024 ~]# strace -frp 57686 > Process 57686 attached - interrupt to quit > 0.000000 fcntl(14, F_SETLKW,

We installed the Samba 3.5.1 rpms for OpenSuSE 10.2 from ftp.sernet.de. The VFS modules seem to be broken. Is this an error in the packaging or do I need to be looking else where. A snippet from the log file follows: <extracted from log> [2010/03/12 19:58:59, 0, pid=28792, effective(0, 0), real(0, 0)] smbd/vfs.c:66(smb_register_vfs) Failed to register vfs module. The module

> On Wed, Feb 11, 2015 at 11:13:42AM +0100, Volker Lendecke wrote: > > On Tue, Feb 10, 2015 at 08:59:21PM -0800, Jeremy Allison wrote: > > > Ah ok - I expected as much. snprintf seems to be > > > broken in that it's returning -1. > > > > > > Is this our snprintf or one from Solaris ? Can > > > you try and track down why it's returning

On Fri, Mar 06, 2015 at 01:38:26PM +0100, Nacho del Rey wrote: > Hi again Volker (& list) > > I think I am very closer of the problem. Sorry, but without access to this system I can't really say what is going on. Please talk to Oracle for support. Samba is running fine on a huge variety of file systems, and if ACFS gives you locking issues, I would request Oracle to fix their