similar to: caret package version 4.63

Version 4.39 of the caret package was sent to CRAN. caret can be used to tune the parameters of predictive models using resampling, estimate variable importance and visualize the results. There are also various modeling and "helper" functions that can be useful for training models. caret has wrappers to over 75 different models for classification and regression. See the package

Version 4.39 of the caret package was sent to CRAN. caret can be used to tune the parameters of predictive models using resampling, estimate variable importance and visualize the results. There are also various modeling and "helper" functions that can be useful for training models. caret has wrappers to over 75 different models for classification and regression. See the package

The following code fails to train a nnet model in a random dataset using caret: nR <- 700 nCol <- 2000 myCtrl <- trainControl(method="cv", number=3, preProcOptions=NULL, classProbs = TRUE, summaryFunction = twoClassSummary) trX <- data.frame(replicate(nR, rnorm(nCol))) trY <- runif(1)*trX[,1]*trX[,2]^2+runif(1)*trX[,3]/trX[,4] trY <-

Max and List, Could you advise me if I am using the proper caret syntax to carry out leave-one-out cross validation. In the example below, I use example data from the rda package. I use caret to tune over a grid and select an optimal value. I think I am then using the optimal selection for prediction. So there are two rounds of resampling with the first one taken care of by caret's train

Version 4.06 of the caret package was sent to CRAN. caret can be used to tune the parameters of predictive models using resampling, estimate variable importance and visualize the results. There are also various modeling and "helper" functions that can be useful for training models. caret has wrappers to over 50 different models for classification and regression. See the package

Version 4.06 of the caret package was sent to CRAN. caret can be used to tune the parameters of predictive models using resampling, estimate variable importance and visualize the results. There are also various modeling and "helper" functions that can be useful for training models. caret has wrappers to over 50 different models for classification and regression. See the package

Dear all, I am using the "caret" Package for predictors selection with a randomForest model. The following is the train function: rfFit<- train(x=trainRatios, y=trainClass, method="rf", importance = TRUE, do.trace = 100, keep.inbag = TRUE, tuneGrid = grid, trControl=bootControl, scale = TRUE, metric = "ROC") I wanted to use ROC as the metric for variable

Dear all, I am using caret package to analyze a microarray dataset with feature selection using sbf(). My dataset is 3500 samples with 2200 genes, the outcome Y variable is a factor of 12 levels. I used the following script to run the feature selection: library(caret) ctrl <- sbfControl(functions=rfSBF, method='repeatedcv', repeats=5) ### x is a matrix of 3500x2200, y is a factor

I am used to packages like e1071 where you have a tune step and then pass your tunings to train. It seems with caret, tuning and training are both handled by train. I am using train and trainControl to find my hyper parameters like so: MyTrainControl=trainControl( method = "cv", number=5, returnResamp = "all", classProbs = TRUE ) rbfSVM <- train(label~., data =

Hi list, I´m working on a predictive modeling task using the caret package. I found the best model parameters using the train() and trainControl() command. Now I want to evaluate my model and make predictions on a test dataset. I tried to follow the instructions in the manual and the vignettes but unfortunately I´m getting an error message I can`t figure out. Here is my code: rfControl <-

Dave Langer in this video https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=z8PRU46I3NY uses the titanic data as an example of using caret to create xgbTree models. The caret train() function has a tuneGrid parameter which takes a list set up like so: tune.grid <- expand.grid(eta = c(0.05, 0.075, 0.1), nrounds = c(50, 75, 100), max_depth = 6:8,

Hi. I am trying to construct a svmLinear model using the "caret" package (see code below). Using the same data, without changing any setting, sometimes it constructs the model successfully, and sometimes I get an index out of bounds error. Is this unexpected behaviour? I would appreciate any insights this issue. Thanks. ~Kendric > train.y [1] S S S S R R R R R R R R R R R R R R R

Here is a snippet to show what i'm trying to do. library(randomForest) library(ROCR) library(caret) data(iris) iris <- iris[(iris$Species != "setosa"),] fit <- randomForest(factor(Species) ~ ., data=iris, ntree=50) train.predict <- predict(fit,iris,type="prob")[,2]

Three more packages will be showing up on your mirror soon. The caret package (short for "Classification And REgression Training") aims to simplify the model building process. The package has functions for - data splitting: balanced train/test splits, cross-validation and bootstrapping sampling functions. There is also a function for maximum dissimilarity sampling. -

Three more packages will be showing up on your mirror soon. The caret package (short for "Classification And REgression Training") aims to simplify the model building process. The package has functions for - data splitting: balanced train/test splits, cross-validation and bootstrapping sampling functions. There is also a function for maximum dissimilarity sampling. -

Hello, I am learning caret package, and I want to use the RFE to reduce the feature. I want to use RFE coupled Random Forest (RFE+FR) to complete this task. As we know, there are a number of pre-defined sets of functions, like random Forest(rfFuncs), however,I want to tune the parameters (mtr) when RFE, and then I write code below, but there is something wrong message, How can I deal with it?

Hi, I am having problems passing arguments to method="gbm" using the train() function. I would like to train gbm using the laplace distribution or the quantile distribution. here is the code I used and the error: gbm.test <- train(x.enet, y.matrix[,7], method="gbm", distribution=list(name="quantile",alpha=0.5), verbose=FALSE,

Hello all, I have searched and have not yet identified a solution so now I am sending this message. In short, I need to split my data into training, validation, and testing subsets that keep all observations from the same sites together ? preferably as part of a cross validation procedure. Now for the longer version. And I must confess that although my R skills are improving, they are not so

Dear R-experts, Here below a toy example with some error messages, especially at the end of the code (Tuning the parameters). Your help to correct my R code would be highly appreciated. ####################################### #libraries library(lattice) library(ggplot2) library(caret) library(randomForest) ?? #Data

Hi Sacha, On second thought, perhaps this is more the direction that you want ... X2 = cbind(X_train,y_train) colnames(X2)[3] = "y" regr2<-randomForest(y~x1+x2, data=X2,maxnodes=10, ntree=10) regr regr2 #Make prediction predictions= predict(regr, X_test) predictions2= predict(regr2, X_test) HTH, Eric On Tue, May 9, 2023 at 6:40?AM Eric Berger <ericjberger at gmail.com>