similar to: dynlm: new version 0.2-0

hello I make a subroutine that give-me a (mathematical) function in string format. I would like transform this string into function ( R function ). thanks for any tips. cleber #e.g. fun_String = "-100*x1 + 0*x2 + 100*x3" fun <- function(x1,x2,x3){ return( ############ evaluation( fun_String ) ############ ) True String mathematical function :-( :-( > nomes [1]

Hi, R users, I'm trying to transform a matrix A into B (see below). Anyone knows how to do it in R? Thanks. Matrix A (zone to zone travel time) zone z1 z2 z3 z1 0 2.9 4.3 z2 2.9 0 2.5 z3 4.3 2.5 0 B: from to time z1 z1 0 z1 z2 2.9 z1 z3 4.3 z2 z1 2.9 z2 z2 0 z2 z3 2.5 z3 z1 4.3 z3 z2 2.5 z3 z3 0 The real matrix I have is much larger, with more than 2000 zones. But I think it should

Hello all R-users _question 1_ I need to make a statistical model and respective ANOVA table but I get distinct results for the T-test (in summary(lm.object) function) and the F-test (in anova(lm.object) ) shouldn't this two approach give me the same result, i.e to indicate the same significants terms in both tests??????? obs. The system has two restrictions: 1) sum( x_i ) = 1 2) sum(

Readers, I am trying to use the zoo package with an array of data: file1: hh:mm:ss 1 hh:mm:ss 2 hh:mm:ss 3 hh:mm:ss 4 file2: hh:mm:ss 11 55 hh:mm:ss 22 66 hh:mm:ss 33 77 hh:mm:ss 44 88 I wanted to merge these data set so I tried the following commands: library(chron) library(zoo) z1<-read.zoo("path/to/file1.csv",header=TRUE,sep=",",FUN=times)

Dear all, I am interested in solving a MIP problem with binary outcomes and continuous variables, which ARE NOT RESTRICTED TO BE NEGATIVE. In particular, Max {z1,z2,z3,b1} z1 + z2 + z3 (s.t.) # 7 z1 + 0 z2 + 0 z3 + b1 <= 5 # 0 z1 + 8 z2 + 0 z3 - b1 <= 5 # 0 z1 + 0 z2 + 6 z3 + b1 <= 7 # z1, z2, z3 BINARY {0,1} # -5<= b1 <=5 (i.e. b1 <= 5; -b1 <= 5 ) Using

Most likely, previous computations have ended up giving slightly different values of say 0.13333. A pragmatic way out is to round to, say, 5 digits before applying unique. In this particular case, it seems like all numbers are multiples of 1/30, so another idea could be to multiply by 30, round, and divide by 30. -pd > On 28 Jul 2017, at 17:17 , li li <hannah.hlx at gmail.com> wrote:

Hi,   I use fCopulae package to draw different graphs of univariate and bivariate skew t.  But the plots titles overlap.  I tried using cex.main, font.main to adjust the size but they still overlaps.  Here is my code: par(mfrow = c(3, 1)) mu = 0 Omega = 1 alpha1 = 0 alpha2 = 1.5 alpha3 = 2 alpha4 = 0.5 Z1 = matrix(dmvst(x, 1, mu, Omega, alpha1, df = Inf), length(x)) Z2 = matrix(dmvst(x, 1, mu,

I have the joint distribution of three discrete random variables z1, z2 and z3 which is captured by "z" and "prob" as described below. For example, the probability for z1=0.46667, z2=-1 and z3=-1 is 2.752e-13. Also, the probability adds up to 1. > head(z) z1 z2 z3 [1,] -0.46667 -1.0000 -1.0000 [2,] -0.33333 -0.9333 -0.9333 [3,] -0.20000 -0.8667 -0.8667

Hi, I am new to R for solving optimization problems, I have set of communication channels with limited capacity with two types of costs, fixed and variable cost. Each channel has expected gain for a single communication. I want to determine optimal number of communications for each channel maximizing ROI)return on investment) with overall budget as constraint.60000 is the budget allocated.

Jim has been exceedingly patient (and may well continue to be so), but this smells like "failure to launch". At what point will you start showing your (failed) attempts at solving your own problems so we can help you work on your specific weaknesses and become self-sufficient? -- Sent from my phone. Please excuse my brevity. On February 25, 2018 7:55:55 AM PST, Val <valkremk at

Dear list members, I am facing difficulties in making a graphics that could show visually results of a model. I have tested the effects of 4 quantitative variables (Z1, Z2, Z3, Z4) on a variable Y using a weighted mixed effects GLM with weights W (using the glmmPQL function). I applied a blocking approach using factor F2 nested in factor F1 as a grouping structure on a random intercept in

Hi, can anyone help me fit betabinomial model to the following dataset where each iD is a cluster in itself , if i use package aod 's betabinom model it gives an estimate of zero to phi(the correlation coeficient ) and if i fix it to the anova type estimate obtained from icc( in package aod) then it says system is exactly singular. And when i try to fit my loglikelihood by

Hello everybody I am trying to extract some observations from a data frame, ie the subjects that belong to a given group, and although t-test etc work if I try to obtain the number of subjects in the subgroup i get some funny numbers. All the subjects with NA for group are included in the subgroups 'group==1' etc. Is this a bug? for example in Windoze R : Copyright 2001, The R

HI Jim and all, I want to put one more condition. Include col2 and col3 if they are not in col1. Here is the data mydat <- read.table(textConnection("Col1 Col2 col3 K2 X1 NA Z1 K1 K2 Z2 NA NA Z3 X1 NA Z4 Y1 W1"),header = TRUE,stringsAsFactors=FALSE) The desired out put would be Col1 Col2 col3 1 X1 0 0 2 K1 0 0 3 Y1 0 0 4 W1 0 0 6 K2 X1

Is it possible to get R to output the value of an expression, that is being calculated within a function? I've attached a very simple example but for more complicated ones would like to be able to debug by seeing what the value of specific expressions are each time it cycles through a loop that executes the expression. I'm relatively new to this so there may be much simpler more elegant

hi Val, Your problem seems to be that the data are read in as a factor. The simplest way I can think of to get around this is: mydat <- read.table(textConnection("Col1 Col2 col3 Z1 K1 K2 Z2 NA NA Z3 X1 NA Z4 Y1 W1"),header = TRUE,stringsAsFactors=FALSE) preval<-data.frame(Col1=unique(unlist(mydat[,c("Col2","col3")]))[-1], Col2=NA,col3=NA) rbind(preval,mydat)

Hi Val, My fault - I assumed that the NA would be first in the result produced by "unique": mydat <- read.table(textConnection("Col1 Col2 col3 Z1 K1 K2 Z2 NA NA Z3 X1 NA Z4 Y1 W1"),header = TRUE,stringsAsFactors=FALSE) val23<-unique(unlist(mydat[,c("Col2","col3")])) napos<-which(is.na(val23)) preval<-data.frame(Col1=val23[-napos],

I'm looking for something along the lines of which ( table ( x ) == max ( table ( x ) ) ) to find the most common level of one factor by several other factors. For instance, I've got > X <- data.frame ( + x = factor ( sample ( c ( "A" , "B" , "C" , "D" ) , 20 , r = T ) ) + , z1 = factor ( sample ( c ( "Before" ,

I am working with amino acid sequences changing each letter to numbers.I have a data from acf transformation called Zm as shown below. I would like to get Indices D1 to D10 and then create F1 to F10 as indicated below. Is there anyway I can do that in R without typing each of them one by one. For example to get D1 to D3, I have to type D1<-c(Zm[[1]])[1][[1]], D2<-c(Zm[[2]])[1][[1]], and

Please look at what I see in your code below (run-on code mush) to understand part of why it is important for you to send your email as plain text as the Posting Guide indicates. You might find [1] helpful. [1] https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/MailingListEtiquette -- Sent from my phone. Please excuse my brevity. On June 25, 2017 2:42:26 PM EDT, Alaios via R-help <r-help at r-project.org>