similar to: where do you put Classes in RoR

Hi! OS: CentOS Linux release 7.1.1503 (Core) Dovecot: 2.2.18 Run user listing - doveadm user '*', single user - work. auth[20540]: segfault at 8 ip 00007fd554340c6b sp 00007ffc17c886e0 error 4 in libauthdb_ldap.so[7fd55433b000+a000] dovecot: auth: Fatal: master: service(auth): child 20540 killed with signal 11 (core dumped) dovecot: auth: Error: net_connect_unix(auth-worker) failed:

On 6/23/20 9:39 AM, Robinson, Paul via llvm-dev wrote: > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: llvm-dev <llvm-dev-bounces at lists.llvm.org> On Behalf Of Jay Foad via >> llvm-dev >> Sent: Tuesday, June 23, 2020 4:47 AM >> To: Mehdi AMINI <joker.eph at gmail.com> >> Cc: llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org; Matt Arsenault <arsenm2 at gmail.com>

R-helpers: If I want to pass a character name of a function TO a function, and then have that function executed, how would I do this? I want an arbitrary version of the following, where any function can be used (e.g. I don't want the if-then statement here): apply_some_function <- function(data,function_name) { if(function_name=="mean") { return(mean(data)) }

In a OpenOffice.org forum someone was asking if the spreadsheet could graph this http://www.elmundo.es/elmundosalud/documentos/2011/06/leche.html I didn't think it could. :) I don't think I've ever seen exactly this layout. Does anyone know if there is anything in R that does a graph like this or that can be adapted to do it. Unfortunately my Spanish is non-existent so I am not

Hi, How could I see the source code of functions in an R package? If we type ?function_name , we will see documentations of the function_name. If we type function_name, is what returns just the source code? Could we just save it in an .R file and modify as we want? However, it seems that sometimes the source code is hidden (or stored elsewhere?) As an example, could we see the source

Hello, I just installed Softick Card Export 2.19 (http://www.softick.com/cardexport2/) on my Palm Tungsten E. It is supposed to let me access the SD card inside my Palm without the need of an external SD card reader. This software is suppposed to be compatible with Linux usb-storage since version 2.15... but I didn't find how to use it. If I do "lsmod | grep -i usb", I see the

`git describe' says V_7_3_P1-207-gc924b2ef (shouldn't it say V_7_4_P1-<yadayada>?). This is what I see: gcc -g -O2 -Wall -Wpointer-arith -Wuninitialized -Wsign-compare -Wformat-security -Wsizeof-pointer-memaccess -Wno-pointer-sign -Wno-unused-result -fno-strict-aliasing -D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -ftrapv -fno-builtin-memset -fstack-protector-strong -fPIE -I. -I.

Hello all, Summary & Context: ------------------------------- I am starting to write a front-end for some domain specific programming languages. Code generation seems to be working fine. However, I am having trouble generating debug info, to be used by gdb. The problem: -------------------- I generate a foo.ll file, that is later compiled into an executable foo. The foo.ll file I

On Tue, 23 Jun 2020 at 03:30, Mehdi AMINI via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > On Mon, Jun 22, 2020 at 2:38 PM Steve Scalpone via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: >> >> Me? I would modify the first sentence from: >> >> > When writing the body of an if, else, or loop statement, >> > omit the braces to avoid unnecessary

Hi, In my llvm code I want to create some function calls. The function prototype is as follows: int memoize ( char *function_name, int *int_params, unsigned num_ints, double *double_params, unsigned num_doubles) In order to create these calls I do the following for example: %88 = alloca [7 x i8] store volatile [7 x i8] c"ORACLE\00", [7 x i8]*

Hi, I'm trying to replace function call with call to wrapper(function_name, num_args, ...), where varargs hold args of original call. Function* launch = Function::Create( TypeBuilder<int(const char*, int, ...), false>::get(context), GlobalValue::ExternalLinkage, "kernelgen_launch_", m2); { CallInst* call = dyn_cast<CallInst>(cast<Value>(I)); if

I'd like to discuss the following change: https://reviews.llvm.org/D37526 For the context, there is a comment in compiler-rt/lib/fuzzer/FuzzerExtFunctionsWeak.cpp: // Implementation for Linux. This relies on the linker's support for weak // symbols. We don't use this approach on Apple platforms because it requires // clients of LibFuzzer to pass ``-U _<symbol_name>`` to the

Hi, >> In the objdump for binary, there is always an address associated with an >> instruction. >> In the bitcode file, is there a way to address an instruction? It does >> not have to be a single ID like objdump. > no, there is no way in general. You can always start a new basic block > just before your instruction and take the address of that basic block. >

Stack colouring should be able to reuse the same stack space, if the live ranges of the pointers don't overlap. But I don't think anyone has built a general solution for alloca'd space. On Mon, Nov 4, 2013 at 6:30 AM, Ali Javadi <aj14889 at yahoo.com> wrote: > Hi, > > In my llvm code I want to create some function calls. The function > prototype is as follows: >

Hi all, I''ve got a preliminary JRuby version of win32-api checked into CVS at the moment under win32-api/lib/win32/api.rb. I''ve also pasted it below. It doesn''t quite work right in that I can''t get it to modify the arguments in place in the API#call method. Take a look at the sample code at the very bottom to see what I mean. I haven''t even tried

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=70511 Priority: medium Bug ID: 70511 Assignee: nouveau at lists.freedesktop.org Summary: nouveau_bo_name_get segmentation fault while running root tutorials/gl/glbox.C QA Contact: xorg-team at lists.x.org Severity: normal Classification: Unclassified

Hi Dimitry, This makes sense if you think about it from the perspective that the string you want passing must be passed at runtime, and so can't use a const char * from compile time. You need to make the string visible in the compiled image, and use that as the argument. A string is an array of 8-bit integers, so you need to create a ConstantArray. Value *v = ConstantArray::get(Context,

libswfdec/swfdec_as_frame.c | 3 - libswfdec/swfdec_as_function.c | 66 ++++++++++++++++-------- libswfdec/swfdec_as_internal.h | 16 ++++- libswfdec/swfdec_as_interpret.c | 60 +++++++++++----------- libswfdec/swfdec_as_object.c | 10 ++- libswfdec/swfdec_as_super.c | 109 +++++++++++++++++++++------------------- libswfdec/swfdec_as_super.h | 10 ++- 7 files

Personally, I favor "always use braces" because it helps readability for me. The compiler may be good at flagging misleading indentation, but my visual processing system is terrible at it, especially since we use a measly two spaces for indentation. And we grant indentation exceptions for--among other things--case labels in switches. When some nested statements have braces and others

libswfdec/swfdec_as_interpret.c | 23 ++++++++++++----------- libswfdec/swfdec_bits.c | 13 +++---------- libswfdec/swfdec_bits.h | 3 +-- libswfdec/swfdec_debugger.c | 2 +- libswfdec/swfdec_movie.c | 2 +- libswfdec/swfdec_script.c | 2 +- libswfdec/swfdec_sprite_movie.c | 4 ++-- libswfdec/swfdec_tag.c | 4 ++--