similar to: R-1.7.0 sources now available through rsync

rsync.r-project.org has been updated to serve the sources for R-0.99.0. There are three versions of the R CVS source tree available for anonymous rsync. $ rsync rsync.r-project.org:: r-release R sources (feature-frozen version) CVS tree (approx 12 MB) r-release-patched patched R sources (feature-frozen version) CVS tree (approx 12 MB) r-devel R sources (development version) CVS

rsync.r-project.org now offers three flavors of the R sources. $ rsync rsync.r-project.org:: r-release R sources (feature-frozen version) CVS tree (approx 10 MB) r-release-patched patched R sources (feature-frozen version) CVS tree (approx 10 MB) r-devel R sources (development version) CVS tree (approx 10 MB) xlispstat xlispstat sources (development version) CVS tree

Full_Name: John Gavin Version: 2.1.0 patched 18-04-05 OS: windows XP SP2 Submission from: (NULL) (139.149.1.203) Hi, I suspect that there may be a bug in utils::setRepositories(). Starting with > getOption("repos") CRAN CRANextra "@CRAN@"

Hi, I just had a very quick look at the StatDataML proposal --- nice work! At the risk of showing my ignorance, I want to mention my first impressions. My first impression is that defining datasets in terms of arrays and list is a bit too high a level. What about simpler vectors, scalars? (I know that R/S don't have scalars, but other systems/applications do.) Can we think of a core

John Fox (see below) raises important questions for the Lisp-stat community (and perhaps the R community) to consider. This message thread was not cross-posted to r-devel@lists.r-project.org, so I do so now. I have never been an active or particularly adept Lisp-stat programmer. But I have worked on or used several projects for which Lisp-stat seemed the ideal environment-- for implementing

Hello, Is it possible to change the default repositories? I've already changed the list in the repositories file under etc/ this is how my repositories file under R/etc looks like: row name menu_name URL default source win.binary mac.binary CRAN CRAN @CRAN@ TRUE TRUE TRUE TRUE BioC Bioconductor http://www.bioconductor.org TRUE TRUE TRUE FALSE

Hi Patrick, Greetings from !(sunny) Pittsburgh. What's the scoop on RCurl on windows (XP)? I've tried to install RCurl_0.92-0.zip and RCurl_0.9-3.zip, with both R 2.7.2 and R 2.8.0 from the RGUI (utils:::menuInstallLocal), and get the error "Windows binary packages in zipfiles are not supported". which (according to google's one and only hit) comes from a perl script.

Hi R users: I got the following message when I use the pixmap library on R 1.7.0 over w2K platform (on R 1.6.2 it runs right). pixmapGrey(matrix(c(0,1),128,128)) Error in .class1(object) : Object "from" not found I download the library .zip file from: http://cran.r-project.org/bin/windows/contrib/1.7/pixmap_0.3-2.zip Other question: When I try to "Install package(s) from

The warnings from make.packages.html() on the Apple Mac OS X platform can be dealt with as follows: ------------------------------------------------ (1) make.packages.html() uses the function tempdir() and attempts to create a temporary directory in the default location /tmp/ which fails due to the /tmp directory architecture on the Mac. I set up a .Renviron file in my user account

[ I hope this is not considered off-topic for the list: A new Quantian release was just announced, and it contains even more R. As before, we have R (now 2.2.1), ESS, Ggobi, Rpy, several BioInfo tools -- but now we also have RSPerl, JGR, rJava and more. A full sync to CRAN and BioC as of Feb 25, 2006 now yields dim(installed.packages())[1] of 877. Feedback welcome, but

[ I hope this is not considered off-topic for the list: A new Quantian release was just announced, and it contains even more R. As before, we have R (now 2.2.1), ESS, Ggobi, Rpy, several BioInfo tools -- but now we also have RSPerl, JGR, rJava and more. A full sync to CRAN and BioC as of Feb 25, 2006 now yields dim(installed.packages())[1] of 877. Feedback welcome, but

We've added 2 additional courses to our April Schedule: (++) R/S Fundamentals and Programming Techniques *** San Francisco / April 24-25, 2008 *** *** New York City / April 28-29, 2008 *** *** Seattle / April 21-22 Regards - Sue > -------- Original Message -------- > Subject: [BioC] XLSolutions 9 Courses: Upcoming March-April 2008 R/S+ > Course Schedule by XLSolutions

I've rolled up R-1.6.2.tgz a short while ago. This is a minor upgrade, fixing an assortment of bugs. You can get it from the developer site at http://cvs.r-project.org/pub/CRAN/src/base/R-1.6.2.tgz or wait for it to be mirrored at a CRAN site near you. Binaries for various platforms will appear in due course. There is also a version split for floppies, but due to the inclusion of

I've rolled up R-1.6.2.tgz a short while ago. This is a minor upgrade, fixing an assortment of bugs. You can get it from the developer site at http://cvs.r-project.org/pub/CRAN/src/base/R-1.6.2.tgz or wait for it to be mirrored at a CRAN site near you. Binaries for various platforms will appear in due course. There is also a version split for floppies, but due to the inclusion of

[ Reposting this here as this Quantian release contains - all CRAN packages as of December 10, 2005 * except the Windows only ones (BRugs, mimR, rcom, RWinEdt) * and three that would not build (Rlsf, ROracle, rJava) for lack of Java, Oracle or rlsf - all BioC packages for release 1.8 * excecpt RMAGEML (needs Java) - for a total of over 800 R packages - a

[ Reposting this here as this Quantian release contains - all CRAN packages as of December 10, 2005 * except the Windows only ones (BRugs, mimR, rcom, RWinEdt) * and three that would not build (Rlsf, ROracle, rJava) for lack of Java, Oracle or rlsf - all BioC packages for release 1.8 * excecpt RMAGEML (needs Java) - for a total of over 800 R packages - a

A post on the Bioconductor mailing list https://stat.ethz.ch/pipermail/bioconductor/2009-May/027700.html suggests that install.packages now references .Rprofile (?), whereas in R-2-8 it did not. Is this intentional? The example is, in .Rprofile library(utils) install.packages("Biobase", repos="http://bioconductor.org/packages/2.4/bioc") then

Right. The methods such as as.data.frame.numeric don't get dispatched, basically because RSMethods tries to interpret class(x) in the S4 sense (so, e.g. a numeric vector has class "numeric"). Problems can then come from different semantics for S3-style and S4-style methods. The older methods don't dispatch on the mode of vectors (or equivalently, on the value of

I have observed a difference in behavior of R CMD check in older R vs R-2.10.x on windows. * using R version 2.10.0 (2009-10-26) * using R version 2.10.1 RC (2009-12-14 r50718) 2.10 seems to be looking on the internet for crossreferenced packages. I am not sure why it is looking. The string <pkg> is not in any of the Rd files. I think it is not finding any CRAN sites because I am

This post updates https://stat.ethz.ch/pipermail/r-devel/2010-January/056301.html https://stat.ethz.ch/pipermail/r-devel/2010-January/056411.html The MinGW-w64 snapshots have moved back to gcc pre-4.4.4 (from pre-4.5.0) with static linking to C++ and Fortran run-time DLLs, and seem more stable. Currently the CRAN package check pages at http://cran.r-project.org/web/checks/check_summary.html