similar to: New R core member

Dear Prof Ripley an d the R core team: I have installed the new RW1010. But I can't see (in RW1010\doc\manual ) the file R-intro.texi I'd like to know if I have done something wrong. Thank you, Juan Antonio -- =========================================== J.A.Caballero M. Dpto. Estadistica e Investigacion Operativa Campus de Rabanales Edificio C-II Universidad de Cordoba 14080 SPAIN

Hola! Solicito ayuda con un data frame relativamente grande ¿? del cual necesito generar una tabla dinámica a la manera excel. Si me pueden referenciar algún comando, paquete, pagina web y/o cualquier ayuda que me puedan dar será muy bienvenida. Lo que tengo que hacer es pasar de algo así: NombreMunicipio NombreProvincia Categoria idMedicamento CodMedicamento CodMedicamentoOL UnidadesEnvSec

I do the these passages: library(Geneland) set.seed(1) data <- simdata(nindiv=200, coord.lim=c(0,1,0,1) , number.nuclei=5 , allele.numbers=rep(10,20), IBD=FALSE, npop=2, give.tess.grid=FALSE) geno <- data$genotypes coord <- t(data$coord.indiv) path.mcmc <-

+ MLIR dev mailing list since that’s where the OrcJit I’m using is. Thanks for all the details, Lang! What you described is exactly what I’m looking for! Please, MLIR dev, let me know if this debug feature and the solution that Lang describes below is interesting for MLIR. I’ll dig more into the details then but it doesn’t seem too complicated. Thanks, Diego From: Lang Hames [mailto:lhames at

Hi all, I have to install 25 IP Phone in some building. I want just basic IP Phones like: Cisco-Linksys SPA922 u$s 146 Grandstream GXP-2000 u$s 105 Snom 300 u$s 119 The most valuables parameters for me are (in importance order from high to low): - Stability (device don't hang in any way) - Voice quality using G729 - Provisioning So what device do

I don´t know if it is a bug, but what's wrong in the folloing (R version 1.1.1, August 15, 2000, under windows 98): > x<-matrix(nrow=10, ncol=2) > for (i in 1:10) + { + x[i][1]<-i + x[i][2]<-i^2 + } Warning messages: 1: number of items to replace is not a multiple of replacement length 2: number of items to replace is not a multiple of replacement length 3: number of items to

Hi! I uploaded a tentative patch for the following bug in LV (https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=34965) but I have some concerns about it. I would appreciate if someone with more experience in SE/PSE can provide some feedback about current tentative fix and alternative solutions described in the comments. Thanks! Diego Caballero, Intel Vectorizer Team

I'm running beta7 on two machines, with maildir on NFS. I have lockd running on all machines. I've found that Dovecot is highly unstable with NFS when accessing a mailbox on more than one machine at the same time. Both dovecot machines have: mmap_disable = yes lock_method = fcntl NFS is version 3, exported from a third linux machine. All machines are running 2.6.9 kernel. Any ideas

Muchísimas gracias Carlos, de verdad que te agradezco la ayuda, pero no es lo que voy buscando. Quiero colocar en el eje de abscisas la secuencia temporal de los meses, es decir, agosto septiembre, octubre, etc? pero no las fechas de las toma de datos, sino que aparezca la marca de un mes, y la siguiente marca sea la del siguiente mes, etc?, y además que las muestras estén separadas de acuerdo con

When I sink the output of an RWeka model to a text file, the output file appears empty: library(RWeka) model = LogitBoost(Species~.,data=iris) print(model) sink("output.txt") print(model) #file output.txt is created, but it is blank sink() Am I doing anything wrong? [[alternative HTML version deleted]]

Hola de nuevo, acabo de encontrar la solución. He creado una variable ficticia con los días 1 de cada mes en la secuencia temporal que quería y después he actuado de la siguiente manera attach(Libro1) plot (xbar~as.Date(fecha,"%d/%m/%y"), type="b", pch=19,cex=2,xaxt="n") xlabels<-strptime(ofeje, format = "%d/%m/%y") axis.Date(1,

Thanks for the feedback, Sanjoy. > SCEV is fairly conservative around PHI nodes that aren't recurrences and aren't obviously equivalent to a min-max branch-phi idiom. Is that the limitation you're running into here? Yes, that's exactly the problem. The problematic PHI nodes (%bc.resume.val and %bc.resume.val1) aren't either recurrences or related to min-max idioms. I

Dear Sir: I am interesting in to use some R functions in some of our developments. But I have a problem which I have not found information in R documentation, for that I ask for help. Can I to call R functions from a C (or another language) program ?. ANd if the answer if yes, could you help me informe me where I can found information to respect? I will be very thanks to you, if you could help

Hola, tengo un problema con la subida de videos al servidor, (tengo apache2 como servidor). Quiero subir un video de unos 150Mb y cuando lo subo en el servidor en modo development me lo sube perfecto pero cuando lo hago en modo produccion no me lo sube y me tira el siguiente error: La conexión fue restablecida La conexión con el servidor http://www.server_name/videos fue restablecida mientras se

Is it possible to use Dovecot frontends in front of UWash backends? I need a proxy pool ASAP. There is not sufficient time to migrate the backends for 40,000+ users so they have to stay UW for now. I have been looking at Perdition but concerned about performance under load. Dovecot looks really promising with it's non-forking mode. I need simple dumb frontends no local mail. Other

Hi! I would appreciate some feedback from someone with experience in SCEV/SE. D39346 tries to fix an issue in LV (PR34965) that exposes a limitation in SCEV/SE. The best solution to the LV issue might not be a fix at SCEV/SE level but we may want to report/address SCEV/SE limitation as well. For the snippet below, LV expects SE to return a SCEVAddRecExpr for %21. However, SE returns ((4 * (zext

Amara, >I support this direction Thanks for the support. >but are there actually any real world workloads where gather/scatter scalarisation would be worth it, on any micro-architecture? If we don’t have examples and the compile time cost is non-negligible then I think we’d still like to keep the early >bailouts in some form.’ It's not like I have specific application code in

Muchas gracias Carlos, previo a mi correo, entre las pruebas que hice estaba una parecida a la que apuntas de la siguiente manera: attach (Libro1) plot (xbar~as.Date(fechas,"%d/%m/%y"), ylim=c(400,660), xaxt="n", type="b", pch=19,cex=1) xlabels<-strptime(fecha,format="%d/%m/%Y") axis.Date (1,at=xlabels,format="%b-%y")

Sorry for jumping from http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2018-September/125853.html but this is relevant. Sorry for not responding to that sooner. I was thinking about a longer reply, and time flied too quickly. >But, as I said back then, before we do so, we need to understand >exactly where to put it. That will depend on what other passes will >actually use it and if we want it

On 01/05/2018 06:28 PM, Saito, Hideki wrote: > Amara, > >> I support this direction > Thanks for the support. > >> but are there actually any real world workloads where gather/scatter scalarisation would be worth it, on any micro-architecture? If we don’t have examples and the compile time cost is non-negligible then I think we’d still like to keep the early >bailouts in