similar to: "partitioning" table access

Ok, so now Users need to be associated with Organizations. I''ve created a migration and added a ''organization_id'' column to the users table. I want the default organization_id to be the first Organization. So I have :default => Organization.find(:first). But it''s complaining about not being able to find the constant ''Organization''. Any

I want to run a single filter in my application.rb file, and then if a certain condition is true, end the action''s processing immediately. Right now I''m using prepend_before_filter to ensure that it gets run first, but some of my around_filters are still being processed. Is there a way that I can clear out all the filters that should be run? Basically it''ll look

After running generate scaffold and pointing the browser, the data list appears correctly, the create new button works okay, but show, edit, delete give the following error: "Could not find Organization without an ID" running on ubuntu breezy with postgresql - data and everything else appears correct - any ideas?

For some reason I am just not able to get this. I am trying to setup an organizational hierarchy, so I have a organization which works fine. From there I want to be able to define new divisions, departments, areas, etc. For creating a Division, my original thought was to pass the organization''s id to the new organization unit form, and then do a Division.new(:organization_id =>

Hi, I''m having a strange problem that only seems to be happening on our production server. I never get this error locally but get it quite often on the server. The other odd thing is it doesn''t seem to be resulting in any error pages on the site. Everything looks fine... I wanted to add a rescue_action_in_public to email me when there are errors. So I followed the

I''m trying to use Capybara to test this. I have a step that goes When I select "Price Chopper" from "Organization" And the step definition is When /^(?:|I )select "(.+)" from "(.+)"$/ do |value, field| select(value, :from => field) end For some reason, I keep getting the error: cannot select option, no select box with id,

Hi all ! Is this supposed to work ? class Email < ActiveRecord::Base has_many :to, :class_name => 'Recipient', :conditions => "recipients.source = 'to'" do def create!(*args) with_scope(:create => {:source => 'to'}) do super end end def build(*args) with_scope(:create => {:source => 'to'}) do

I''m using rails 3.2.1 with jquery for an ajax call. My juqery code is : jQuery.ajax({ url: "/org_pages", data: ''org_id=''+ org_id, type: "POST", success: function(result){ jQuery("#image_center").html("<%= escape_javascript(render(:partial =>

Hi, I am new to Rails (and Ruby) and for what i have seen sofar i like it a lot! But i can''t figure out what the best sollution would be for the following: Lets say i want to setup a CRM system and i have to sorts of contacts: Customers and Prospects. A part of the info is the same (addresses, company info etc) for both customers an prospects and a part is different. What i would

I am new to rails and have come across a problem with a sample application I was working on. When trying to use rake migrate I got the error listed below. my db file contains the following class ContactDb < ActiveRecord::Migration def self.up create_table "people" do |t| t.column "id", :integer t.column "name",

Hi I just started using RGui.exe under widnows. I have a text file containing date arranged in columns and rows, each column has the same format, each row with different formats. 3 of the columns are something like this 1/12/2006 3:59:45 PM I need to calculate the different in seconds between 2 selected periods using their row’s index My solution: Read the file in a data frame and

Hi... Isn''t there a proper way or hack/workaround for the following? * For the example with unfortunate disabilities.. look below,,, Usage of has_* (associationmethods) do {def with_deleted AccociatedModel#with_scope} {Paranoid''s#find_with_deleted}... The has_one associations give me a nil object when invoking it with Model.association_OBJECT.with_deleted. Has_many does like

Hello :) I have two data frames, one has properties taken on a piece by piece basis and the other has performance on a lot by lot basis. I wish to combine these two data frames but the problem is that each lot has multiple pieces and hence i need to take a mean of the properties of multiple pieces and match it to the row having data about the lot. I was wondering if there is a simple commmand,

Dear R-core There is a different output for the apply function due to the change of unlist as mentioned in the R news. Newly, applying as.factor() (or factor()) in str(dat <- data.frame(x = 1:10, f1 = gl(2,5,labels = c("A", "B")))) (d1 <- apply(dat,2,as.factor)) newly returns a character matrix while in R-2.3.1 the same command resulted in an integer matrix that was

Hello everbody, i'm currently using the anova()-test for a small data.frame of 40 rows and 2 columns. It works well, but is there any preconditions for a valid variance analysis, that i should consider? Thank you for your answer, Daniel

Hi all, I''m wrestling with the scoped acces plugin to generate object access controll, but the :create params don''t seem to get through. :find works great. This is the code around_filter ScopedAccess::Filter.new(Service, :service_filter) layout "settings" protected def service_filter { :find => {:conditions => ["business_id =

Dear R-list I have a question concerning the argument "adjustSigma" in the function "lme" of the package "nlme". The help page says: "the residual standard error is multiplied by sqrt(nobs/(nobs - npar)), converting it to a REML-like estimate." Having a look into the code I found: stdFixed <- sqrt(diag(as.matrix(object$varFix))) if (object$method

hi list, i have to ask you again, having tried and searched for several days... i want to do a TukeyHSD after an Anova, and want to get the adjusted p-values after the Tukey Correction. i found the p.adjust function, but it can only correct for "holm", "hochberg", bonferroni", but not "Tukey". Is it not possbile to get adjusted p-values after

I have some doubts about the validity of my procedure to estimeate linear contrasts ina a factorial design. For sake of semplicity, let's imagine a one way ANOVA with three levels. I am interested to test the significance of the difference between the first and third level (called here contrast C1) and between the first and the seconda level (called here contrast C2). I used the following

hi all, I wish to draw on the same graphic device 3 functions. But i don't want them to be on different graph, i want to compare them on the same I don't need mfrow or mfcol, I need something else... 1 graph on 1 device inside this graph 3 ploted function. I saw something unsing data.frame, but i think it's overkill, and something less complicated must exist, if not why? why not