similar to: Noble is looking for a Market Risk Manager/Analyst for its London Office, prefer Candidates who have R programming skills

##################################################### Noble America Announcement for Summer Internship 2011 ###################################################### Organization Name: Noble America, http://www.thisisnoble.com/ Location: Stamford, Connecticut, USA Period: 10-12 Weeks for Summer 2011 starting May/June 2011 Brief Description of work: The summer intern will work on

On Wed, Nov 13, 2013 at 6:36 PM, Mikael Lyngvig <mikael at lyngvig.org> wrote: > A quick question while I am adding a tiny section on ccache to the > HowToAddABuilder document: Why do you set CCACHE_CPP2 to yes? From reading > the manual, I get the impression that this is much slower than the default > and that it should only be used with tricky compilers or when debugging. Is

On Thu, Nov 14, 2013 at 4:40 AM, Mikael Lyngvig wrote: > Yes, ARM normally runs as a little-endian and it is a 32-bit CPU. It CAN be > configured to be a big-endian system, but that requires hardware support as > far as I know. > > I do have an old, slow Mac Mini G4 PowerPC (big-endian) that I could hook up > as a builder too. I was thinking of it the moment you mentioned big

[quote=There's a bug filed for this problem here: http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13064 with a patch attached also, that might help.[/quote] Thanks for sharing informative link with us....!! Regards, Ross Taylor

On Wed, Nov 13, 2013 at 4:53 PM, Mikael Lyngvig <mikael at lyngvig.org> wrote: > Hi guys, > > I have this ODROID XU (quad-core ARMv7 Cortex A15 1,6 GHz) box that I want > to make available to the LLVM project. I can see that LLVM already has an > ARMv7 Cortex A9 system doing Clang, but how should this box be used, if at > all? We're talking a long-term commitment

Thanks for spotting those errors! Fixed. If you feel that this doc should be part of the LLVM documentation, perhaps in a revised form, just let me know. I am willing to convert it into reST and also to go through a peer review, but I simply cannot spend hundreds of hours munging about, rewriting, and retesting over and over as I am already busy on other documentation and other sub-projects.

Hi guys, I have this ODROID XU (quad-core ARMv7 Cortex A15 1,6 GHz) box that I want to make available to the LLVM project. I can see that LLVM already has an ARMv7 Cortex A9 system doing Clang, but how should this box be used, if at all? We're talking a long-term commitment within the realm of being a buildbot slave. It builds LLVM in about 40 minutes, excluding the test suite.

On Sat, Nov 16, 2013 at 9:15 PM, Mikael Lyngvig <mikael at lyngvig.org> wrote: > http://llvm.lyngvig.org/Articles/How-to-Setup-an-Arch-Linux-Buildbot-for-LLVM > Notice: You only need Ninja for the test build; none of the official LLVM builders use Ninja as far as I know. My buildbots use ninja. > Please notice that you must specify the absolute path to ninja, otherwise CMake

Yes, ARM normally runs as a little-endian and it is a 32-bit CPU. It CAN be configured to be a big-endian system, but that requires hardware support as far as I know. I do have an old, slow Mac Mini G4 PowerPC (big-endian) that I could hook up as a builder too. I was thinking of it the moment you mentioned big endian. I actually bought it for testing C++ code on because big-endian machines are

On Nov 13, 2013, at 6:17 PM, Sean Silva <chisophugis at gmail.com> wrote: > > What do you want me to build? LLVM? Clang? Both plus test suite? > > Personally, I see more value in building LLVM, Clang, possibly lld, > > I think LLD would especially benefit from testing on other architectures, since LLD is the most prone to accidentally having something

On Sun, Nov 17, 2013 at 12:53 AM, Mikael Lyngvig <mikael at lyngvig.org> wrote: > Thanks for spotting those errors! Fixed. > > If you feel that this doc should be part of the LLVM documentation, > perhaps in a revised form, just let me know. I am willing to convert it > into reST and also to go through a peer review, but I simply cannot spend > hundreds of hours munging

A quick question while I am adding a tiny section on ccache to the HowToAddABuilder document: Why do you set CCACHE_CPP2 to yes? From reading the manual, I get the impression that this is much slower than the default and that it should only be used with tricky compilers or when debugging. Is Clang such a tricky compiler? If so, I suppose Clang should be fixed, not the ccache configuration. --

I finally got it to work - and my ODROID-XU is now a passive member of the LLVM builder society for the next week or so, until it has proven itself (it monitors changes to the SVN repository and builds in my end without bothering anyone at LLVM.org about its findings). I did write up a "short" treatise on how to do it, in case anybody needs to do this sometime in the future. I expect

On Wed, Nov 13, 2013 at 5:28 PM, Mikael Lyngvig <mikael at lyngvig.org> wrote: > Hi Dmitri, > > I am not using any kind of cache (didn't even know of ccache). I have now > installed ccache. Perhaps ccache should be mentioned in the buildbot > document so that every buildbot owner knows about it? Possibly. > It is currently running Arch Linux ARM. if there are good

On 20 November 2013 23:11, Mikael Lyngvig <mikael at lyngvig.org> wrote: > My XU is on build 141 and there hasn't been a single problem yet. No > reboots, no crashes, and as far as I have observed no core dropouts (after > I did the cpu-freq trick you sent me). Perhaps I have a stable board or > perhaps it is because of its revision (rev. 0.3)? > That's good to

On Wed, Nov 13, 2013 at 8:28 PM, Mikael Lyngvig <mikael at lyngvig.org> wrote: > Hi Dmitri, > > I am not using any kind of cache (didn't even know of ccache). I have now > installed ccache. Perhaps ccache should be mentioned in the buildbot > document so that every buildbot owner knows about it? > > It is currently running Arch Linux ARM. if there are good

On Wed, Nov 13, 2013 at 8:48 PM, Dmitri Gribenko <gribozavr at gmail.com>wrote: > On Wed, Nov 13, 2013 at 5:28 PM, Mikael Lyngvig <mikael at lyngvig.org> > wrote: > > Hi Dmitri, > > > > I am not using any kind of cache (didn't even know of ccache). I have > now > > installed ccache. Perhaps ccache should be mentioned in the buildbot > >

Renato, thanks for your elaborate walk-through of the issues with ARM boards. I'm trying to add some of this to the "How to Build on ARM" document and will submit a patch later on. I already ran into the problem of cores disappearing, but on Arch Linux (which uses a fairly recent kernel), the missing cores come back as soon as the load falls to zero. Unfortunately, my personal

I'll use a redirection to the new article then. Did you try out the .htaccess thingy we talked about on LLVM.org? It should work, without any webmaster's assistance. 2013/11/21 Sean Silva <chisophugis at gmail.com> > > > > On Wed, Nov 20, 2013 at 6:11 PM, Mikael Lyngvig <mikael at lyngvig.org>wrote: > >> Hi Renato, >> >> My XU is on build

On 14 November 2013 17:43, Mikael Lyngvig <mikael at lyngvig.org> wrote: > Renato, thanks for your elaborate walk-through of the issues with ARM > boards. I'm trying to add some of this to the "How to Build on ARM" > document and will submit a patch later on. > Nice, thanks! That would be great! Unfortunately, my personal budget does not allow me more than a