similar to: uuidtools across processes

Hi, I am using UUIDTools to generate my Guids. It works fine on my computer (Windows Xp), but doesn''t work on my host (TextDrive) The error is: Loading production environment. >> UUID.timestamp_create.to_s /sbin/ifconfig: Permission denied NoMethodError: private method `split'' called for nil:NilClass from ./script/../config/../config/../lib/uuidtools.rb:236:in

Hi all, I am using rails 3.1 and ruby 1.9.3,Now i want to use uuid concept in rails 3 for existing data so i did like :- create_table :posts, :id => false do |t| t.string :uuid, :limit => 36, :primary => true end ActiveRecord::Base.class_eval do # old rails versions set_primary_key ''uuid'' before_create :generate_uuid def generate_uuid self.id =

I need to create certain number of UUId records(based on the selection of drop down) and save it in the database. Now I am generating only one unique id. Can this be done in the model in this way. Or do I need to write a helper file for that?? def generate_unique_token=(value) self.secret = Base64.encode64(UUIDTools::UUID.random_create)[0..8] end In my controller........... def create

Folks, I''m using the "uuidtools" package to generate (hopefully) unique values for IDs within a partial (for products being added to an order form, where nothing is saved to the DB until the end). Unfortunately when I add a new product line (using RJS page.insert.html rendering a partial) the new lines added all have the same UUID. Here''s the code from the (top of

A quick survey... what''s the best gui debugging tool for Rails 1.0 on Linux that you''ve used? SW versions? Personally I''ve tried FreeRIDE 0.95 and RDT 0.7.0 in Eclipse 3.1.2. Both are very slow and the latter got quite a few bugs itself. TIA! -- Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.

I''m using Sequel as my ORM and Test::Unit as my testing framework and have the following model: class Item < Sequel::Model validates do presence_of( :name, :uuid, :vendor_id, :vendor_reference, :amount, :currency_code ) uniqueness_of( :uuid ) end def initialize( *args ) super( *args ) self.uuid = UUID.random_create.to_s end end As you can see I overwrite

Saw a lot of recommendations for Firebug (http://www.joehewitt.com/software/firebug/) on this list. I''ve scanned its docs and tried it--many useful features. But I''m so dense that I can''t get it to spy XHR/AJAX requests and their response on FC5 running Firefox 1.5.0.4 and Firebug 0.4. Can someone tell me how to get to

> > We would also include a secure random number generator which links > > against OpenSSL. This would of course be an optional module disabled > > by default, but is necessary so the randomization is cryptographically > > secure and useful in security applications. > > I am not sure why you need this feature. You can provide LLVM with a > SEED value that can be

Does puppet doc require a specific version of any gems (such as rdoc or rake) to operate? I''m getting some errors when I try to generate my rdoc now. # puppet doc --output /var/www/test --modulepath /etc/puppet/environments/test/modules -m rdoc RDoc::RDocError is deprecated and will be removed in RDoc 4 Could not generate documentation: uninitialized constant RDoc::RDoc::Generator

In an attempt to provide a gracefully degradable link_to_remote, I repeat myself every time: <%= link_to_remote(''Signup'', {:url => {:controller => ''user'', :action => ''signup''}}, {:href => url_for(:controller => ''user'', :action => ''signup'')}) %> Looked around the RDoc &

When processing a request, where can you obtain the language setting of a user''s browser? I know we can read @request.env["HTTP_ACCEPT_LANGUAGE"] in an action easily. But I need to access it before being routed to a controller''s action... because the accepted language dictates my app''s language setting programmatically and what action to take.

On Mon, Aug 26, 2013 at 9:14 PM, Todd Jackson <quantum.skyline at gmail.com>wrote: > > > We would also include a secure random number generator which links >> > against OpenSSL. This would of course be an optional module disabled >> > by default, but is necessary so the randomization is cryptographically >> > secure and useful in security applications.

Performance experts, Normally to receive e-mails is to pipe their content to script/runner individually from a mail server, sendmail or postfix. Doesn''t this configuration run like Apache 1.3 with CGI, meaning for each e-mail a boot of the entire Rails environment and thus low scalability? Is there anything working like lighttpd-fcgi or going toward its approach? DD -- Posted via

Searched around this forum, but didn''t find an answer for this question. Can you help this newbie understand any overlap and/or difference between request.xhr? and respond_to? If request.xhr? is true, should I expect it wants.js below? respond_to do |wants| wants.html { redirect_to(person_list_url) } wants.js wants.xml { render :xml => @person.to_xml(:include

I am doing some testing with the rails trunk, version I switched to because of memory leaks in 0.13.1 under linux environment. Right now the application is running fast and steady under linux, with no memory leaks using SCGI Rails Runner 0.4.3 from Zed, BUT it has become unusable under Windows (our main development environment) where I am getting a lot of segmentation faults. BUT the problem

When I run rake test:units I get this error: 292 tests, 350 assertions, 2 failures, 13 errors rake aborted! Command failed with status (1): [/usr/local/bin/ruby -I"lib:test" "/ usr/loc...] This error just showed up yesterday --- I have no idea how I caused it. Here is my gem list in case that helps: actionmailer (2.3.2, 2.2.2) actionpack (2.3.2, 2.2.2) activerecord (2.3.2, 2.2.2)

Hi Stephen, > Greetings LLVM Devs! > > I am a PhD student in the Secure Systems and Software Lab at UC > Irvine. We have been working on adding randomness into code generation > to create a diverse population of binaries. This diversity prevents > code-reuse attacks such as return-oriented-programming (ROP) by > denying the attacker information about the exact code layout.

I have my application happily generating UUID primary keys using the uuidtools gem. But the auto-generated specifications created by "script/generate rspec_scaffold...", etc, assume that one is using a sequential integer primary key. For those who have hit this same issue, is it just a matter of rewriting the auto-generated specifications to take this into account, or does one have to

Hi All Need some brilliants minds here :) I''m using Rails 2.3.8 & ruby 1.8 (I know, I know... ) I''ve move my gems from .gems to Bundler, but I''m having some issues with Factory_girl when I rake spec "uninitialized constant Factory" I''m following the instructions from http://gembundler.com/rails23.html. Basically: - grab all config.gem and place

Anyone who has met such a kind of problem? I am adding i18n characteristics to my webapp using gettext,it works under IE,while not under firefox. here is my codes: po: po\zh_CN\myapp.po after rake makemo, i have got: locale\zh_CN\LC_MESSAGES\myapp.mo require ''gettext/rails'' class ApplicationController < ActionController::Base init_gettext "myapp" end Then I use