Displaying 20 results from an estimated 200 matches similar to: "RJS Queue"
2007 Jan 26
3
Newbie question.
Sorry for my ignoreance I''m kind of new to this....
I have a requirement for a page that essentially consists of three
"DIVS".
DIV1 - This is static, it has a bunch of links that initiate a AJAX
request to populate DIV2
DIV2 - Populated as a result of a request initiated from DIV1.
- This needs to have further links that will initiate a AJAX
request to populate DIV3.
2006 Apr 03
3
render :partial + redirect_to :controller
This is of course disallowed, which I discovered only after nearly
completing my spanking new ajaxified UI. What is the motivation behind
this, and what is the best workaround?
This UI does a scriptaculous drag-and-drop of items from a first div
(div1) over to a second div (div2), which triggers the contents of div2
to be updated to reflect the drop. No prob, thus far. But then the
2011 Nov 16
1
Checking for monotonic sequence
I am scraping data from a web page using XML (excellent package BTW - that's scraping data the easy way!).
So far, I've got the code:
tables <- readHTMLTable(theurl)
rhf <- tables$tabResHistFull
div1 <- rhf[which(rhf$V1=="Div ps"),]
div1
which is giving me the result:
V1 V2 V3 V4 V5 V6 V7 V8 V9 V10 V11 V12 V13 V14 V15
15
2006 Mar 30
9
Getting data from multiple controllers (Newbie question)
Hello,
Assuming I have the following setup for one page:
<column A><data from controller 1 /> </columnA>
<column B><data from controller 2 /> </columnB>
<column C><data from controller 3 /> </columnC>
Assuming the page is created for Controller 2, what would be the best
way(s) to gather/render the data from the other controllers?
Best
2006 Jan 14
14
Javascript/AJAX Debugging
Hello !
I''m trying to implement something similar to the "multiple updates" section
of the Web2.0 chapter of the Agile book.
I implemented my version, and nothing is happening. No javascript errors,
my logs look fine, page is rendered fine... just no Effect.Highlight. Here
is the code:
views/causes/cause_home/index.rhtml
===============
<%= form_remote_tag(:complete =>
2013 Aug 08
0
[LLVMdev] Convert fdiv - X/Y -> X*1/Y
On 08.08.2013, at 18:25, Chad Rosier <chad.rosier at gmail.com> wrote:
> I would like to transform X/Y -> X*1/Y. Specifically, I would like to convert:
>
> define void @t1a(double %a, double %b, double %d) {
> entry:
> %div = fdiv fast double %a, %d
> %div1 = fdiv fast double %b, %d
> %call = tail call i32 @foo(double %div, double %div1)
> ret void
>
2013 Aug 08
0
[LLVMdev] Convert fdiv - X/Y -> X*1/Y
I did few transformation in Instruction *InstCombiner::visitFDiv() in an
attempt to remove some divs.
I may miss this case. If you need to implement this rule, it is better
done in Instcombine than in DAG combine.
Doing such xform early expose the redundancy of 1/y, which have positive
impact to neighboring code,
while DAG combine is bit blind.
You should be very careful, reciprocal is very
2013 Aug 08
0
[LLVMdev] Convert fdiv - X/Y -> X*1/Y
Hi Chad,
This is a great transform to do, but you’re right that it’s only safe under fast-math. This is particularly interesting when the original divisor is a constant so you can materialize the reciprocal at compile-time. You’re right that in either case, this optimization should only kick in when there is more than one divide instruction that will be changed to a mul.
I don’t have a strong
2013 Aug 08
3
[LLVMdev] Convert fdiv - X/Y -> X*1/Y
I remember why I didn't implement this rule in Instcombine. It add one
instruction. So,
this xform should be driven by a redundancy eliminator if you care code
size.
On 8/8/13 10:13 AM, Shuxin Yang wrote:
> I did few transformation in Instruction *InstCombiner::visitFDiv() in
> an attempt to remove some divs.
> I may miss this case. If you need to implement this rule, it is
>
2013 Aug 08
13
[LLVMdev] Convert fdiv - X/Y -> X*1/Y
I would like to transform X/Y -> X*1/Y. Specifically, I would like to
convert:
define void @t1a(double %a, double %b, double %d) {
entry:
%div = fdiv fast double %a, %d
%div1 = fdiv fast double %b, %d
%call = tail call i32 @foo(double %div, double %div1)
ret void
}
to:
define void @t1b(double %a, double %b, double %d) {
entry:
%div = fdiv fast double 1.000000e+00, %d
%mul = fmul
2013 Nov 01
2
[LLVMdev] loop vectorizer: this loop is not worth vectorizing
I am trying a setup where the one loop is rewritten as two loops. This
avoids the 'rem' and 'div' instructions in the index calculation (which
give the loop vectorizer a hard time).
However, with this setup the loop vectorizer complains about a too small
loop.
LV: Checking a loop in "main"
LV: Found a loop: L3
LV: Found a loop with a very small trip count. This loop
2006 Aug 16
8
Multiple (AJAX) Observers on the Same Field and MSIE
I have been using multiple observers, i.e., observe_field(), on the same
input field and relying on them to execute in the same order that they
appear in the page. This has been working fine in FireFox, but it does
not seem to work in MSIE; the requests come in and are processed in a
different order. Now, I''ve always been a little hesitant about using
this technique, but it always
2013 Aug 08
0
[LLVMdev] Convert fdiv - X/Y -> X*1/Y
I believe we were under the impression that InstCombine, as a canonicalized/optimizer, should not increase code size but only reduce it.
Minor aside, but you don't need all of fast-math for the IR, just the "arcp" flag, which allows for replacement of division with reciprocal-multiply.
On Aug 8, 2013, at 10:21 AM, Shuxin Yang <shuxin.llvm at gmail.com> wrote:
> I remember
2013 Nov 01
0
[LLVMdev] loop vectorizer: this loop is not worth vectorizing
In the case when coming from C it was probably the loop unroller and SLP
vectorizer which vectorized the code. Potentially I could do the same in
the IR. However, the loop body that is generated in the IR can get very
large. Thus, the loop unroller will refuse to unroll the loop in a large
number of (important) cases.
Isn't there a way to convince the loop vectorizer that it should
2013 Aug 08
2
[LLVMdev] Convert fdiv - X/Y -> X*1/Y
On Aug 8, 2013, at 9:56 AM, Jim Grosbach <grosbach at apple.com> wrote:
> Hi Chad,
>
> This is a great transform to do, but you’re right that it’s only safe under fast-math. This is particularly interesting when the original divisor is a constant so you can materialize the reciprocal at compile-time. You’re right that in either case, this optimization should only kick in when
2006 May 22
13
Canceling a specific effect
Is there a way to cancel a specific effect? For instance; Effects are
added to the queue. Before actually processing the effect, I''d like to
check a condition & cancel the effect if necessary.
Here''s the code excerpt:
var menu = {
toggleText: function(element,toggle) {
var vis = $(element+''Text'').visible();
if (toggle && !vis)
2006 Jun 23
2
Queue 3 or more RJS actions
My .rjs file
page.visual_effect :BlindUp, "people", :queue => ''front'' #first action
page.replace_html "people", :partial => ''person/person_compressed'',
:collection => @search_results , :queue => ''end'' #second action, after
first is done
page.visual_effect :BlindDown, "people" , :queue =>
2005 Aug 25
0
[PATCH] do not use beforeStart, afterFinish, beforeUpdate, and afterUpdate internally in combination effects
Hello,
my patch separates usage of the callback between the user, combination
effects, and the core effects.
Consider these use cases.
a) user - core effects
b) user - combination effects - core effects
For a), the existing callbacks can be used by the user
For b), the existing callbacks are partly used by the combination
effects as a communication channel to the core effects, therefore they
2005 Dec 28
6
Sudden Javascript Console noise in firefox
I have been using the latest version of Firefox and Scriptaculous for about
a week now, with no problems.
Now I get a lot of noise in the javascript console out of the blue:
http://img481.imageshack.us/img481/7913/screen4nt.jpg
--
============================
Brian Peiris
Brampton, Ontario, Canada
brianpeiris-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org or
2006 Jul 04
1
using weights in lrm
Dear all,
just a quick question regarding weights in logistic regression. I do
results <- lrm(y.js ~
h.hhsize
+ h.death1
+ h.ill1
+ h.ljob1
+ h.fin1
+ h.div1
+ h.fail1
+ h.sex
+ h.ch.1