similar to: Using volumes during fix-layout after add/remove-brick

On 15/08/11 20:00, gluster-users-request at gluster.org wrote: > Message: 1 > Date: Sun, 14 Aug 2011 23:24:46 +0300 > From: "Deyan Chepishev - SuperHosting.BG"<dchepishev at superhosting.bg> > Subject: [Gluster-users] cluster.min-free-disk separate for each > brick > To: gluster-users at gluster.org > Message-ID:<4E482F0E.3030604 at superhosting.bg>

Hello, I'm having trouble migrating data from 1 removed replica set to another active one in a dist replicated volume. My test scenario is the following: - create set (A) - create a bunch of files on it - add another set (B) - rebalance (works fine) - remove-brick A - rebalance (doesn't rebalance - ran on one brick in each set) The doc seems to imply that it is possible to remove

Hello, Thanks to "partner" on IRC who told me about this (quite big) problem. Apparently in a distributed setup once a brick fills up you start getting write failures. Is there a way to work around this? I would have thought gluster would check for free space before writing to a brick. It's very easy to test, I created a distributed volume from 2 uneven bricks and started to

Hi guys, we have a rebalance running on eight bricks since July and this is what the status looks like right now: ===Tue Oct 18 13:45:01 CST 2011 ==== rebalance step 1: layout fix in progress: fixed layout 223623 There are roughly 8T photos in the storage,so how long should this rebalance take? What does the number (in this case) 22362 represent? Our gluster infomation: Repository

Hi, I simplified the config in my first email, but I actually have 2x4 servers in replicate-distribute with each 4 bricks for 6 of them and 2 bricks for the remaining 2. Full healing will just take ages... for a just single brick to resync ! > gluster v status home volume status home Status of volume: home Gluster process TCP Port RDMA Port Online Pid

Hi, I'm trying to create striped replicated volume but getting tis error: gluster volume create cloud stripe 4 replica 2 transport tcp nebula1:/dataPool nebula2:/dataPool nebula3:/dataPool nebula4:/dataPool wrong brick type: replica, use<HOSTNAME>:<export-dir-abs-path> Usage: volume create<NEW-VOLNAME> [stripe<COUNT>] [replica<COUNT>]

Amar, Thanks for your prompt reply. No, I do not plan to fix the code and re-compile. I was hoping it could be fixed with setting the shared-brick-count or some other option. Since this is a production system, we will wait until a fix is in a release. Thanks, Eva (865) 574-6894 From: Amar Tumballi <atumball at redhat.com> Date: Wednesday, January 31, 2018 at 12:15 PM To: Eva Freer

You do not need to reset brick if brick path does not change. Replace the brick format and mount, then gluster v start volname force. To start self heal just run gluster v heal volname full. On Thu, Feb 1, 2018 at 6:39 PM, Alessandro Ipe <Alessandro.Ipe at meteo.be> wrote: > Hi, > > > My volume home is configured in replicate mode (version 3.12.4) with the bricks >

Hi, My volume home is configured in replicate mode (version 3.12.4) with the bricks server1:/data/gluster/brick1 server2:/data/gluster/brick1 server2:/data/gluster/brick1 was corrupted, so I killed gluster daemon for that brick on server2, umounted it, reformated it, remounted it and did a > gluster volume reset-brick home server2:/data/gluster/brick1 server2:/data/gluster/brick1 commit

Hi, I think we have a workaround for until we have a fix in the code. The following worked on my system. Copy the attached file to */usr/lib*/glusterfs/**3.12.4**/filter/*. (You might need to create the *filter* directory in this path.) Make sure the file has execute permissions. On my system: [root at rhgsserver1 fuse2]# cd /usr/lib/glusterfs/3.12.5/ [root at rhgsserver1 3.12.5]# l total 4.0K

Hi Freer, Our analysis is that this issue is caused by https://review.gluster.org/17618. Specifically, in 'gd_set_shared_brick_count()' from https://review.gluster.org/#/c/17618/9/xlators/mgmt/glusterd/src/glusterd-utils.c . But even if we fix it today, I don't think we have a release planned immediately for shipping this. Are you planning to fix the code and re-compile? Regards,

Nithya, I will be out of the office for ~10 days starting tomorrow. Is there any way we could possibly resolve it today? Thanks, Eva (865) 574-6894 From: Nithya Balachandran <nbalacha at redhat.com> Date: Wednesday, January 31, 2018 at 11:26 AM To: Eva Freer <freereb at ornl.gov> Cc: "Greene, Tami McFarlin" <greenet at ornl.gov>, "gluster-users at

Hello I have a Distributed-Replicate volume and I would like to know if it is possible to see what sub-volume a brick belongs to, eg: A Distributed-Replicate volume containing: Number of Bricks: 2 x 2 = 4 Brick1: node1.localdomain:/mnt/data1/brick1 Brick2: node2.localdomain:/mnt/data1/brick1 Brick3: node1.localdomain:/mnt/data2/brick2 Brick4: node2.localdomain:/mnt/data2/brick2 Is it possible

Dear All- There are a lot of the following type of errors in my client and NFS logs following a recent volume expansion. [2012-02-16 22:59:42.504907] I [dht-layout.c:682:dht_layout_dir_mismatch] 0-atmos-dht: subvol: atmos-replicate-0; inode layout - 0 - 0; disk layout - 9203501 34 - 1227133511 [2012-02-16 22:59:42.534399] I [dht-common.c:524:dht_revalidate_cbk] 0-atmos-dht: mismatching

Ok, it looks like the same problem. @Amar, this fix is supposed to be in 4.0.1. Is it possible to regenerate the volfiles to fix this? Regards, Nithya On 17 April 2018 at 09:57, Artem Russakovskii <archon810 at gmail.com> wrote: > pylon:/var/lib/glusterd/vols/dev_apkmirror_data # ack shared-brick-count > dev_apkmirror_data.pylon.mnt-pylon_block3-dev_apkmirror_data.vol > 3:

The values for shared-brick-count are still the same. I did not re-start the volume after setting the cluster.min-free-inodes to 6%. Do I need to restart it? Thanks, Eva (865) 574-6894 From: Nithya Balachandran <nbalacha at redhat.com> Date: Wednesday, January 31, 2018 at 11:14 AM To: Eva Freer <freereb at ornl.gov> Cc: "Greene, Tami McFarlin" <greenet at

Hi! Until now, I use Gluster in a 2-server setup (volumes created with replica 2). Upgrading the hardware, it would be helpful to extend to volume to replica 3 to integrate the new machine and adding the respective brick and to reduce it later back to 2 and removing the respective brick when the old machine is cancelled and not used anymore. But it seems that this requires to delete and

Hi Eva, I'm sorry but I need to get in touch with another developer to check about the changes here and he will be available only tomorrow. Is there someone else I could work with while you are away? Regards, Nithya On 31 January 2018 at 22:00, Freer, Eva B. <freereb at ornl.gov> wrote: > Nithya, > > > > I will be out of the office for ~10 days starting tomorrow. Is

Hi, dear glfs experts: I've been using glusterfs (version 3.2.6) for months,so far it works very well.Now I'm facing a problem of adding two new bricks to an existed replicated (rep=2) volume,which is consisted of only two bricks and is mounted by multiple clients.Can I just use the following commands to add new bricks without stopping the services which is using the volume as motioned?

Hi Richard, Thanks for the informations. As you said there is gfid mismatch for the file. On brick-1 & brick-2 the gfids are same & on brick-3 the gfid is different. This is not considered as split-brain because we have two good copies here. Gluster 3.10 does not have a method to resolve this situation other than the manual intervention [1]. Basically what you need to do is remove the