similar to: Hello

Hi, We have upgraded the openssh 4.6P1 on Solaris 8 servers. After upgrade we get the below error message whenever we execute the remote commands using ssh. Please let me know what the fix is for this. Apr 8 03:03:43 dvsrv10 sshd[25379]: [ID 800047 auth.info] Accepted publickey for osteam from 10.0.93.31 port 35856 ssh2 Apr 8 03:03:50 dvsrv10 sshd[25381]: [ID 800047 auth.error] error:

I'm using winbind to authenticate telnet session under Red Hat Enterprise 2.1 samba/winbind version 2.2.10 Domains are NT4 domains I have everything set up and configured correctly. Local users and users from trusted domains are able to log-in. I'm having a problem with the resulting username when a user logs on from a trusted domain. Local domain is phonic Trusted domain is thisted

I am a relative R newbie and I am having trouble with reshape() on R V1.9.1 on Linux. The same code appears to be ok when run on R V2.2.0 on Windows and a V2.1 on Linux. Any help would be great as I need to stay on V1.9 for the immediate future... Thanks, Reid Hutchins df <- data.frame(state= rep(1:2, each=8), school=rep(1:2,each=4), class=rep(1:2,each=2),Values2Columns=rep(1:2,

Dear R-devel, A while ago Prof. Ripley had mentioned that g77 on AMD64 isn't the greatest, and the Salford Fortran is likely to be better. My question is, has anyone tried compiling R with Salford compilers (or other commercial compilers)? If so, do they offer performance advantages over GCC? TIA for any info. Best, Andy Andy Liaw, PhD Biometrics Research PO Box 2000, RY33-300

As per request by Arnaud in the users list Device manufacturer: Apollo Device name: 1085VC (Retailer's product page: http://shop.esquire.co.za/ProductDescription.aspx?id=583072) upsc on mains power: > $ upsc apollo > battery.voltage: 13.50 > battery.voltage.nominal: 12.0 > beeper.status: enabled > device.mfr: > device.model: > device.type: ups > driver.name:

Hi you all! I''ve got Mongrel saying this when I use the localization simplified plug-in: any idea? ** Loading any Rails specific GemPlugins Exiting /opt/local/lib/ruby/vendor_ruby/1.8/rubygems/source_index.rb:92:in `load_specification'': /Users/stratboy/Documents/05_SAMPLES/RAILS/newser/vendor/plugins/l10n-simplified-0.8/lib/localization_simplified.rb:13:in `gsub!'':

> I think many people were confused by this at first but an excellent counter > example was provided in a previous thread: C99 ABIs can require that struct > return values are returned via a pointer to a preallocated struct passed as > an auxiliary argument *except* when you're talking about a C99 complex, in > which case the return value is conveyed in a completely different

> The same can be said of closures, garbage collection and a dozen other > features that also cannot feasibly be added to LLVM. > > The only logical solution is to build a HLVM on top of LLVM and share that > between these high-level language implementations. This is an excellent point. You have convinced me. :-) BTW, what garbage collector are you using for your HLVM? You

I have an Android client (x-plore) that was able to see and mount shares from my server until the latest upgrade. I've tried setting client ipc min protocol = NT1, but it still can't browse to the server and can't connect to shares if I supply the address.Is there some browsing/sharing setting that I might have missed in the most recent version? This is Debian bullseye samba

I have an Android client (x-plore) that was able to see and mount shares from my server until the latest Debian upgrade. I've tried setting client ipc min protocol = NT1, but it still can't browse to the server and can't connect to shares if I supply the address.Is there some browsing/sharing setting that I might have missed in the most recent version? This is Debian bullseye

> Why do you say that people who compile, e.g., functional languages > would benefit from type variables in LLVM? > I like the level the LLVM is at, and would prefer to deal with > instantiating parametric polymorphism at a higher level. I'm surprised you're happy with a non-polymorphic llvm. Does Cayenne target llvm? Dependent types take polymorphism to new heights -- but

mongreleers, This is a hack for adding basic upload progress support to Mongrel. Currently, you can monitor the upload of any POST. I''m sure some work needs to be done to get it functioning with Rails. Save as lib/mongrel/progress. Anyway, here''s how to start Mongrel with it: require ''mongrel'' require ''mongrel/camping'' require

> It's done by the front-end. There are a variety of attributes and > mechanisms which are used to convolute data and marshall it through > call sites in an ABI-conformant manner. Oh dear. :-( Do the attributes change depending on the type? I would assume that attributes like "ccc" are type-invariant; i.e. every instantiation should use the C-calling convention, whatever

> I was thinking of the "T extends Comparable" part, which does involve > subtype polymorphism. Apologies if I'm getting terms mixed up. It was a bad example -- not close enough to actual LLVM. :-) > What do the parametrized types give you that you don't get from using > opaque instead of T? Possibly nothing. I don't really understand the limitations of

On Fri, Nov 8, 2013 at 8:44 AM, Filip Pizlo <fpizlo at apple.com> wrote: > Is the expectation that to utilize this metadata an optimization pass > would have to inspect the body of @f and reason about its behavior given > <args>? > > > Yes. > > > If so, then I think this is pretty bad. If we ever want to parallelize > function passes, then they can't

Thanks for the detailed response! :-) > This is by design. LLVM's type system is very low-level... Yes, and it should remain low-level. :-) > Expecting it to directly support generics seems a third-order-of- > magnitude leap of faith. :) But there is good news for the faithful? Let us distinguish between generics as found in java or .Net, and parametric polymorphism in general.

> I think the problem is deeper than that, in that LLVM has no official > concept of a subtype, so I don't see how the idea of polymorphism > could be defined in it. Parametric polymorphism is different from subtype polymorphism; you can have one without the other. Parametric polymorphism just means that you can use type variables (like T) in the IR, which are later instantiated to

Hello, I have started learning FXRuby about 2 weeks ago. Now I''m trying to launch the scintilla_test.rb from the fxruby-1.6 installation directory (/usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/fxruby-1.6.16/examples) and get this error: /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/fxruby-1.6.16/lib/fox16/kwargs.rb:2007:in `old_initialize'': wrong number of arguments (8 for 0) (ArgumentError) from

Cross-posted to the blog (at http://lylejohnson.name/blog/2010/08/04/moving-on/): When Jamis Buck wrote last year about ceasing development on Capistrano, his post really struck a chord with me. If this post reminds you of that one, it''s because I re-read it before sitting down to compose this one. It was the next best thing to having Jamis on hand to give me a pep talk before I had to

<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN"> <html><head><title>Repository of sample FXRuby programs?</title> <META http-equiv=Content-Type content="text/html; charset=windows-1252"> <meta http-equiv="Content-Style-Type" content="text/css"> <style type="text/css"><!-- body {