similar to: Re: Rails Digest, Vol 20, Issue 593

I''m an independent software developer that spends a fair amount of time each day working on Rails-related project. t''d be really great to meet some people to chat about rails, software development, or whatever else geeky stuff via IM! If interested, shoot me an e-mail or reply here. Personally, I''m a little apprehensive about putting all my info out there on a list

On Nov 7, 2014, at 11:47 AM, Ted Mittelstaedt <tedm at mittelstaedt.us> wrote: > Now I suppose your going to respond with that immature drivel that's been floating around, lets see if I remember it: > >> Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text. >> > Why is top-posting such a bad thing? >> >> Top-posting. >>

........But I'm trying to give my son a "cool-yet-kind-of-geeky" 13th Birthday Present......he hinted he liked the CentOS logo, but where would I find things that are branded with it?....searching the web doesn't really help me much, only because I'm not sure what I need to be looking for...any help would be greatly appreciated! Thanks in advance!! EGO II

On 18.10.19 13:20, Michal Hocko wrote: > On Fri 18-10-19 10:50:24, David Hildenbrand wrote: >> On 18.10.19 10:15, Michal Hocko wrote: >>> On Wed 16-10-19 16:14:52, David Hildenbrand wrote: >>>> On 16.10.19 16:03, Michal Hocko wrote: >>> [...] >>>>> But why cannot you keep the reference count at 1 (do get_page when >>>>> offlining

>> Please note that we have other users that use PG_offline + refcount >= 1 >> (HyperV balloon, XEN). We should not affect these users (IOW, >> has_unmovable_pages() has to stop right there if we see one of these pages). > > OK, this is exactly what I was worried about. I can see why you might > want to go an easier way and rule those users out but wouldn't be it

Hello! I have 2 table: users and buddies User: id, name, ... Buddy: id, user_id, user_buddy_id, ... So if you have 2 users 1,jack and 2,fred and fred is a buddy of jack, there is a Buddy object: id=1, user_id=1, user_buddy_id=2 I can declare only one belongs_to in Buddy and one has_many in User. And there is conflict if I had the second one (the first one is discarded) class User has_many

Hi! I write a gem at the moment. The Gem need to register during the process in the rack middleware. So I make an folder "rack" inside my "lib" folder. I called the file "request.rb" because it keeps track of requests. So we speaking about the file /lib/rack/request.rb But even if I place an empty file on this, I get the following:

On 04/05/2016 03:54 AM, Naoya Horiguchi wrote: > On Mon, Apr 04, 2016 at 04:46:31PM +0200, Vlastimil Babka wrote: >> On 04/04/2016 06:45 AM, Naoya Horiguchi wrote: >>> On Mon, Apr 04, 2016 at 10:39:17AM +0900, Minchan Kim wrote: > ... >>>>> >>>>> Also (but not your fault) the put_page() preceding >>>>> test_set_page_hwpoison(page))

How long does one have to typically wait for an answer to a post? Tomorrow my message will have been up a week, and I've gotten no replies. It was about whether a file, while it was being written to, could subsequently be opened by another client for reading. I used a DVR with chasing play as an example. Didn't seem like that difficult of a question, but maybe it isn't geeky

On 16.10.19 15:45, Michal Hocko wrote: > On Wed 16-10-19 14:50:30, David Hildenbrand wrote: >> On 16.10.19 13:43, Michal Hocko wrote: >>> On Thu 19-09-19 16:22:25, David Hildenbrand wrote: >>>> virtio-mem wants to allow to offline memory blocks of which some parts >>>> were unplugged, especially, to later offline and remove completely >>>>

On 16.10.19 13:43, Michal Hocko wrote: > On Thu 19-09-19 16:22:25, David Hildenbrand wrote: >> virtio-mem wants to allow to offline memory blocks of which some parts >> were unplugged, especially, to later offline and remove completely >> unplugged memory blocks. The important part is that PageOffline() has >> to remain set until the section is offline, so these pages

On Tue, Apr 05, 2016 at 10:20:50AM +0200, Vlastimil Babka wrote: > On 04/05/2016 03:54 AM, Naoya Horiguchi wrote: > > On Mon, Apr 04, 2016 at 04:46:31PM +0200, Vlastimil Babka wrote: > >> On 04/04/2016 06:45 AM, Naoya Horiguchi wrote: > >>> On Mon, Apr 04, 2016 at 10:39:17AM +0900, Minchan Kim wrote: > > ... > >>>>> > >>>>>

On Tue, Apr 05, 2016 at 10:20:50AM +0200, Vlastimil Babka wrote: > On 04/05/2016 03:54 AM, Naoya Horiguchi wrote: > > On Mon, Apr 04, 2016 at 04:46:31PM +0200, Vlastimil Babka wrote: > >> On 04/04/2016 06:45 AM, Naoya Horiguchi wrote: > >>> On Mon, Apr 04, 2016 at 10:39:17AM +0900, Minchan Kim wrote: > > ... > >>>>> > >>>>>

Hi all I have members in my application, and every member can assign other members as buddies. class Member < ActiveRecord::Base # Hat folgende Buddies has_and_belongs_to_many :buddies, :class_name => ''Member'', :join_table => ''members_have_buddies'',

On Fri 18-10-19 14:35:06, David Hildenbrand wrote: > On 18.10.19 13:20, Michal Hocko wrote: > > On Fri 18-10-19 10:50:24, David Hildenbrand wrote: > > > On 18.10.19 10:15, Michal Hocko wrote: [...] > > > > for that - MEM_GOING_OFFLINE notification. This sounds like a good place > > > > for the driver to decide whether it is safe to let the page go or not.

On Fri 18-10-19 14:35:06, David Hildenbrand wrote: > On 18.10.19 13:20, Michal Hocko wrote: > > On Fri 18-10-19 10:50:24, David Hildenbrand wrote: > > > On 18.10.19 10:15, Michal Hocko wrote: [...] > > > > for that - MEM_GOING_OFFLINE notification. This sounds like a good place > > > > for the driver to decide whether it is safe to let the page go or not.

Hi Team! Just having a bit of trouble with the many-to-many relationship of the same type. Im trying to build a buddy list. So I have a users table and want to allow each user to have a buddlist of users. Ive tried having a User model and a Buddy model where the buddy model has 2 fields user_id and a buddy_id but i cant get the buddy.name methods to resolve when getting a list of buddies.

On 18.10.19 10:15, Michal Hocko wrote: > On Wed 16-10-19 16:14:52, David Hildenbrand wrote: >> On 16.10.19 16:03, Michal Hocko wrote: > [...] >>> But why cannot you keep the reference count at 1 (do get_page when >>> offlining the page)? In other words as long as the driver knows the page >>> has been returned to the host then it has ref count at 1. Once the

A follow up (late better than never) Finally had time to sit down and look at this sip.cfg <keys key.scrolling.timeout="1" key.IP_500.31.function.prim="BuddyStatus"/> This turns the Services key which I never use on a 501 into the Buddy Status. It even works while on a call. One touch! Bill ________________________________ From: Bill Gibbs

There seems to be some hostility to the idea of this being a GNOME or Evolution problem: Bug 542280 ? Refuses to report bugs because gnome 2.16.x is too old View Bug Activity Product: bug-buddy Component: general Version: 2.16.x Status: RESOLVED Resolution: WONTFIX Opened by Mark Hull-Richter (reporter, points: 3) 2008-07-09 23:40 UTC [reply] On CentOS 5.2 (and 5.1 and 5.0, and Red Hat