Displaying 20 results from an estimated 20000 matches similar to: ""Stack Level Too Deep" issue in HABTM Unit / Functional Test"
2006 Aug 09
6
Stack level too deep with actionmailer
HI,
Anytime I try to send emails with actionmailer I get a stack level too
deep SystemStackError. There were several other posts related to stack
overflows, but none of them invovled actionmailer. I''m using some
plugins acts_as_taggable, acts_as_ferret, rails 1.1.4, actionmailer
1.2.3. Here is my full stack trace.
Any ideas?
2006 Mar 13
5
UPS Shipping Table?
Has anyone been able to get a UPS shipping calculator implemented into
their site with Rails? It seems the only options they show on their site
both use UPS''s own page displayed either standalone or within your own
header and footer, but no straight API with a callback or anything. Can
anyone point me in the right direction?
--
Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.
2006 May 30
3
extra attributes in habtm
Hi,
Posting here since issue tracking isn''t the best place to discuss.
I can understand habtm is moving towards deprecating support for extra
attributes in join_table, and to use :through for those cases instead.
To clarify, patch<http://dev.rubyonrails.org/attachment/ticket/5216/habtm_join_table_test.patch1.diff>for
#5216 <http://dev.rubyonrails.org/ticket/5216>
2006 Jun 05
7
Is HABTM Dying?
For a while, I''ve been getting that HMT is replacing HABTM. It appears that
HMT can do all of what HABTM can do and more. The question is: Should I stop
using HABTM? Let''s take a simple case:
A case has many categories
For a given category, there are certain valid statuses
Category
has_and_belongs_to_many :statuses
Status
has_and_belongs_to_many :categories
Question:
Is
2006 Feb 16
1
HABTM -VS- belongs_to/has_many, for self-referential joins
Ok, David says on page 241 that sometimes a many-to-many relation with
attributes are better implemented as an actual model instead of using HABTM.
Well, I''ve got that situation and I can''t figure it out.
All of the examples in the book have HABTM examples between 2 different
tables, but I want to have a HABTM relation on 1 table with itself. (e.g.,
if I have a table Things,
2006 Jun 30
2
how to HABTM with STI ??
Hello all
This is my first post so excuse the basic question. (and any repeats I just
got an email saying this post was too big so I have re-submitted a smaller
version)
I was following the thread on
http://lists.rubyonrails.org/pipermail/rails/2006-May/038988.html regarding
the STI on HABTM for RoR.
I have a very similar problem and was hoping for some help.
I have the
2006 Mar 13
3
HABTM: two habtm''s between the same two tables
Imagine I want to track people, and the clubs that they belong to.
table people with columns person_id, person_name
table clubs with columns club_id, club_name
And I have the association table:
table clubs_people with columns person_id, club_id
Now I know how to do this habtm between the two, in order to associate
people with clubs that they belong to.
However my application also needs a
2006 Feb 14
1
Another HABTM Question
Hi there,
I have a question on what would be the best way to save a HABTM model.
A posting habtm categories, and a category habtm postings.
class Category < ActiveRecord::Base
has_and_belongs_to_many :postings
end
class Posting < ActiveRecord::Base
has_and_belongs_to_many :categories
end
In my blog_controller, where the actual posting is saved, is where I
think I''m
2009 Jan 20
0
alias_method_chain in Facebooker Causing Stack Level Too Deep
I installed the Facebooker plugin and upon placing it on a staging server, I
keep running into stack level too deep errors. It seems to stem from
Facebooker using alias_method_chain to override some of the
ActionController methods. I believe it''s getting loaded twice causing
confusion. I''ve tried various methods include wrapping a unless
respond_to?(:method) around the
2008 May 12
1
'Stack level too deep' error
Hi,
Sometimes I am getting "Stack level too deep" exception. I have know no
idea on when I am getting and why I am getting.
Please give your suggestions.
Thanks in advance...
--
Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group.
2007 May 16
2
Hit mongrel once...all is well, hit it again...stack level too deep?
Hi there.
I''ve dropped a mongrel log item here:
http://pastie.caboo.se/62052
I can hit my app fine, once. Hitting it again gives me a 500 error and
this log entry. I think it''s application code causing the problem as I
have a second app running that doesn''t have this behavior, but I''m
unsure how to proceed finding root cause here.
Suggestions?
2006 Jan 20
1
stack level too deep from has_many / belongs_to relationship
I have the following 3 models (2 models joined by an intermediate):
1. class Exercise < ActiveRecord::Base
2. has_many :routines, :class_name=>''RoutineExercise''
3. end
1. class Routine < ActiveRecord::Base
2. has_many :exercises,
3. :class_name=>''RoutineExercise'',
4. :order=>''position''
5. end
1. class
2006 Jun 06
1
stack level too deep
Iam new to ferret Iam trying to do a sample application on ferret
this is my code:
class SearchController < ApplicationController
require ''ferret''
include Ferret
index = Index::Index.new(:path => ''/path/to/index'')
def list
end
def index
index << {:title => "Programming Ruby", :content => "blah blah
blah"}
2006 Mar 22
3
stack level too deep error : Pulling my hairs out
Hello, I''ve changed something in my test application and since I can''t
find the cause of the "stack level too deep" raising on every request.
I''ve removed almost every part of code and the error still occurs, eg
with this url : www.myhost.com/main/index
routes.rb (nothing else in this file)
map.connect '':controller/:action/:id''
2007 Dec 31
0
Install woes : ''Stack level too deep'' exceptions
I have Ruby 1.8.6 03-13-2007 patch
rails 2.0.2
Subversion is 1.4.5
I took the cruisecontrol-1.2.1.tgz download. I followed the steps in the
getting started guide.
On the "cruise add project" step I get a failure ''stack level too deep'' - No
log files are created.
Any ideas ?
-- Gishu
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
2010 Jun 14
2
stack level too deep
I''m getting this on my client:
Jun 14 15:21:26 s_sys@app09.fr.xxx.com puppetd[24751]: Could not
retrieve catalog: stack level too deep on node app09.fr.twofish.com
Jun 14 15:21:26 s_sys@app09.fr.xxx.com puppetd[24751]: Not using cache
on failed catalog
Since running puppetd in debug gives no useful info:
info: Starting handler for Runner
info: Starting server for Puppet version 0.24.8
2009 Jan 18
2
after_save -- stack level too deep
Hi all,
I''m running into a brick wall trying to figure out my problem here. I
have a model that has a boolean property called "paid". I''d like to
add the following to my model:
def after_save
self.amount == self.splits.sum(:amount) ? self.update_attribute
(:paid, true) : self.update_attribute(:paid, false)
end
The problem is, when I do this I get an error that
2007 Dec 25
1
puppetd: err: Got an uncaught exception of type SystemStackError: stack level too deep
i''m having trouble with a file resource with 0.24.1. the manifest is
very simple:
file { "/":
ensure => directory,
owner => "root",
group => "root",
mode => 755
}
when i run puppetd, i get the attached stack trace. removing this
resource enables puppetd to complete its run successfully.
any ideas? didn''t have this
2006 Jul 10
7
What is has_many :through really buying you over HABTM?
So having just learned how to do has_many :through as opposed to HABTM,
and then, being concerned that I wouldn''t get it to work, I started
thinking about these two approaches.
It seems to me that the _only_ problem that the HM:T (has_many :through)
approach solves that HABTM doesn''t is the issue of the potential
collision of id columns between your join table and one of
2006 Feb 09
2
select options for HABTM?
I''ve looked through the docs and the wiki and can''t
figure out how to go about generating select options
and the update function for an item that has a HABTM
relationship.
I have a ''parks'' table and the park model has a HABTM
to the ''states'' table. On the park edit page, I''d like
a multiple select box to appear with all states show,