similar to: acts_as_versioned with lock_version bug?

I know this has been rehashed many times, but I don''t get it. I can''t find it documented to were I understand all the parts. I can make this work using Rails database design conventions, but in this case I am not able to do that. I find examples, but the ones I find do not follow the conventions. They also do not give enough information to understand what is going on. In

Hi, I am using attr_accessor attributes in model class and assigning the values to attr_accessor dynamically in controller. And am sending the data object to display in Yaml format. I am getting the response along with changed_attributes but I don''t want changed_attributes details in my response. build Model code class Test < ActiveRecord::Base attr_accessor: t_1, t_2, t_3, t_4 end

Hi, Just wondering when one would use "include" over "extend"? Both seem to bring in methods to the class no? The context is I''m just trying to understand why both are used with the acts_as_audited plugin: Full extract from plugin (used within here): ================================================== # Copyright (c) 2006 Brandon Keepers # # Permission is hereby

Hi, Is there a way to tell Rails that the magic field name for optimistic database locking is not lock_version? I have a legacy database where the optimistic locking field is named "version". Thanks, Phil -- Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.

My first stab at the whole metaprogramming / DSL thing. Fun stuff. Includes unit tests, fixtures, etc, etc. Tested against Oracle and PostgreSQL so far. I''d appreciate it if some MySQL folks could try it out. Hopefully I got the MySQL CREATE TABLE syntax correct. http://dev.rubyonrails.org/ticket/3402 Assuming this kind of thing is OK, I''d like to make

If I have an exception while trying to save an object, how can I tell Rails that it''s not saved yet? The object has a lock_version (used for optimistic locking). This is what I do: ins = MyClass.new( arguments ) begin transaction do ins.save! bunch_of_other_stuff() end rescue ins.save! # problem here! end The object''s save() sets the internal object state in a saved

Hi everyone, I have a order with order_lines use case. On changing the lines, I want to be sure no one else changed the order. So I use lock_version on the order. This works fine if something is changed on the order record. But now i have the situation that I delete, alter and add order lines without changing the order record itself. I have to check and increment the order#lock_version however

Shouldn''t update_all be updating lock_version? As you can see from my console session below, it is upating the record (changed running attribute to true and returned 1 to show 1 recored was updated). But it did not increment lock_version. And optimistic locking is working correctly otherwise. As you can see below, lock version = 562 before and after the update_all call but it is

I want to create a migration file that creates multiple tables, so i''m guessing the correct format would be: Can anyone confirm ? I''m guessing that each new create script requires a seperate class so formatted this way. Perhaps I''m wrong. TIA Stuart class CreateTable1 < ActiveRecord::Migration def self.up create_table :table1s do |t| t.column :length,

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hello All, I have had a problem detecting the network card on my notebook when ACPI is enabled for a year. The problem still exists in 7.1-RELEASE. with ACPI: ... bge0: <Broadcom NetLink Gigabit Ethernet Controller, ASIC rev. 0xb002> irq 17 at device 0.0 on pci8 bge0: 0x10000 bytes of rid 0x10 res 3 failed (0, 0xffffffff). bge0: couldn't

Dear r-helpers, I am looking for an R-equivalent for the eval-function in javascript which can interpret a string as code on runtime, thereby allowing things like for (i in c(1:2)) { eval(items + "i") <- read.csv(eval(filename+ i), dec=","); } which would execute (with filename="testfile"): items1 <- read.csv(testfile1, dec=","); items2 <-

I''d like to delete some records before saving them. I ran this experiment: before_save :prune_lab_datas def prune_lab_datas lab_datas.each do |lab_data| lab_data.destroy end raise lab_datas.to_yaml end But nothing seems to be deleted in the hash: --- - &id001 !ruby/object:LabData attributes: created_at: 2010-03-21 22:16:06 unit_id: "3"

Hello everybody, i am a newbie in using Xen. The first three tries to install Xen on my Gentoo box aren''t very successfull. But now i know how to get the dom0 Domain running. So my Xentoo (Xen + Gentoo = Xentoo) ist coming up. My system is configures like this: /dev/hda1 = /boot /dev/hda2 = / /dev/hda3 = LVM-Partition /dev/hda4 = SWAP /dev/vg01/SYSP = Gentoo System for dom1

Hello Peter. Thank you for writing memdisk and isolinux. I've created a bootdisk with it, and it works gread with floppy images and noemulation (WinXP). I've created also a harddisk image with "nero Burning-Software". It works with the createted CD. But when I use the created harddisk image with memdisk. I'l receive error Message as follows. <<screen.jpg>>

Hello, I'm running samba 2.0.7 in a little nt-domain with security = domain. This works fine, but I don't want to manually put my nt-domain-users to local users of my linux server. So I put in my smb.conf quick and dirthy: add user script = /usr/sbin/useradd -m -s /bin/false %u This works, smbrun called useradd and the account would be successful createt and return is 0, but Samba asks

Hello. I hope this is the right place to describe my problem ? After upgrading to Rails version 1.1.2 from rails version 1.0.0, Web Service functional tests seem broken. I upgraded rails (as the root user / administrator) with: # gem update rails --include-dependencies then I upgraded my application (as myself) with: ? rake rails:update % rake rails:update:configs After these steps,

Hey, I don't know if this is the right list to ask this question in, but I have tried on the IRC (irc.freenode.net #samba) and people on there advised me to try here instead. I have: Debian 4.0r4 Samba version 3.0.24 - mail.birke-gym.dk - 10.3.16.1 krb5 Version 1.4.4-7etch6 Kernel Version 2.6.18-6-amd64 A Windows Server 2003 SP2 with AD/DC - bgdc.birke-gym.dk - 10.3.17.1

Hey, I don't know if this is the right list to ask this question in, but I have tried on the IRC (irc.freenode.net #samba) and people on there advised me to try here instead. I have: Debian 4.0r4 Samba version 3.0.24 - mail.birke-gym.dk - 10.3.16.1 krb5 Version 1.4.4-7etch6 Kernel Version 2.6.18-6-amd64 A Windows Server 2003 SP2 with AD/DC - bgdc.birke-gym.dk - 10.3.17.1

Good Morning! We got in some troubles using trusted domains and winbind. First i will tell you something about the network and samba configuration. For our SMB Environment we use Samba 3.2.12. We have three trusted domains. Our Samba Server uses LDAP as Backend. Most of the time it worked nice, but after some time Winbind loses User Entrys. On the windows side i can see "unknown user

Hi, I have installed debian 3.1 on an Intel Pentium D processor 920 ( including vanderpool.) The installation worked fine and i''m able to start guest-domains. When I try to start the 5.th Guest-Domain, I Get the following error: Error: Device 769 (vbd) could not be connected. Backend device not found. this problem exists still if i have shutdown or destroyed all guests, after