similar to: sun (oracle) 7110 zfs low performace fith high latency and high disc util.

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 90 matches similar to: "sun (oracle) 7110 zfs low performace fith high latency and high disc util."

2007 Apr 05
1
tools for performace testing
Hi Xen Users, I''d like to run some performance tests with Xen. Are there some (sort of) standard test-cases or tooling? I''m thinking about using the Linux Test Project''s "Database Opensource Test Suite" (http://ltp.sourceforge.net) Does someone have any experience with this? Other recommendations? Thanks. Regards, Gábor
2013 Jun 07
0
Bad performace for NV18 driver
On Fri, Jun 7, 2013 at 5:56 PM, Carlos Garces <carlos.garces at gmail.com> wrote: > Hi! > > I have some strange results on my test with nouveau drivers > > I'm using a old GeForce4 MX 4000 (NV18) with 128 MB. > > I have made 2 test. > > -The default configuration, using nomodeset without nouveau_vieux_dri.so > > $inxi -G > Graphics: Card: NVIDIA NV18
2014 Jul 22
1
asterisk performace 64bits
Hello, I'm running Asterisk on a CentOS 64-bit server. . Asterisk if I compile using the ./configure --libdir=/usr/lib64 instead of ./configure have a relative gain performace.? Has anyone done any comparison? Is there any way in the compilation or even in settings that I can improve the performace of the asterisk? tks Eduardo -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was
2012 Apr 28
1
SMB2 write performace slower than SMB1 in 10Gb network
Hi forks: I've been testing SMB2 with samba 3.6.4 performance these days, and I find a weird benchmark that SMB2 write performance is slower than SMB1 in 10Gb ethernet network. Server ----------------------- Linux: Redhat Enterprise 6.1 x64 Kernel: 2.6.31 x86_64 Samba: 3.6.4 (almost using the default configuration) Network: Chelsio T4 T420-SO-CR 10GbE network adapter RAID: Adaptec 51645 RAID
2005 Jun 23
2
Management: Reload performace & Realtime performance ?
Hello, I am interested in some management-performance issues: 1st Scenario: A management tool (for example a webbased one) has the following process: - write in database - read with script (for example perl) data from db and write conf files - reload asterisk I was reading around in the mailing lists and people say reloading is stable. Now this tool has to manage 1000 clients so the conf
2006 Nov 08
1
Looking for new ideas to improve linux router performace
Hello, I have 2 dual CPU Xeon 3Ghz HT enabled Linux routers and each one of them serving 2 class C with pick traffic on router about 300Mbit full duplex 2 x Ethernet controller: Intel Corporation 82546GB Gigabit Ethernet Controller (rev 03) 1GB ram And 2 x Ethernet controller: Broadcom Corporation NetXtreme BCM5703 Gigabit Ethernet (rev 10) 1GB ram Both routers have about 600
2013 Oct 25
1
GlusterFS 3.4 Fuse client Performace
Dear GlusterFS Engineer, I have questions that my glusterfs server and fuse client perform properly on below specification. It can write only *65MB*/s through FUSE client to 1 glusterfs server (1 brick and no replica for 1 volume ) - NW bandwidth are enough for now. I've check it with iftop - However it can write *120MB*/s when I mount nfs on the same volume. Could anyone check if the
2009 Jul 09
1
merge performace degradation in 2.9.1
I have noticed a significant performance degradation using merge in 2.9.1 relative to 2.8.1. Here is what I observed: N <- 100000 X <- data.frame(group=rep(12:1, each=N), mon=rep(rev(month.abb), each=N)) X$mon <- as.character(X$mon) Y <- data.frame(mon=month.abb, letter=letters[1:12]) Y$mon <- as.character(Y$mon) Z <- cbind(Y, group=1:12) system.time(Out
2013 Jun 07
2
Bad performace for NV18 driver
Hi! I have some strange results on my test with nouveau drivers I'm using a old GeForce4 MX 4000 (NV18) with 128 MB. I have made 2 test. -The default configuration, using nomodeset without nouveau_vieux_dri.so $inxi -G Graphics: Card: NVIDIA NV18 [GeForce4 MX 4000] X.Org: 1.12.4 drivers: vesa,nouveau (unloaded: fbdev) Resolution: 1024x768 at 0.0hz GLX Renderer: N/A
2012 Sep 29
1
quota severe performace issue help
Dear gluster experts, We have encountered a severe performance issue related to quota feature of gluster. My underlying fs is lvm with xfs format. The problem is if quota is enabled the io performance is about 26MB/s but with quota disabled the io performance is 216MB/s. Any one known what's the problem? BTW I have reproduce it several times and it is related to quota indeed. Here's the
2013 Jun 08
1
Bad performace for NV18 driver
After update the system now I use: Kernel 3.9.2 x server 1.12.4 nouveau 1.0.7 the xorg config are at: http://pastebin.com/2LUxLiVs It's the one installed by my distro, without any modification I have made 2 test. Normal boot Xorg at http://pastebin.com/reZdAXEF GLX Renderer is detected as GLX "Mesa DRI nv18 x86/MMX+/3DNow!+/SSE GLX" Same configuration with nomodeset Xorg log
2007 Feb 18
3
CentOS 4.4-IBM Netvista Performace Problems, help needed.
I've got an odd situation that I need some advise on. I have two computers that I am planning to use as a cluster. I initially started with some left over Compaq Presairos with 667MHz CPUs. I loaded CentOS 4.3 and later updated to 4.4. Things ran normally, albeit slowly. I had an opportunity to upgrade to a pair of IBM Netvistas with 2.26 GHz CPUs, I did this by transferring the
2008 Jul 24
13
performace of disks
Hello, Queries: 1 - what is the best RAID (0,1,5,10,50) for server running very, very VM instances ??? 2 - and config of stripes/element sizes (32, 64, 128, 256, etc, KB) ?? 3 - in the configuration of VM, exit one difference in performance between image file (disk:/) or LVM partition (phy:/) ??? any URL or docs for read about this theme ? mmm.. it is all for moment. thanks -- -- Victor
2007 May 29
6
Deterioration with zfs performace and recent zfs bits?
Has anyone else noticed a significant zfs performance deterioration when running recent opensolaris bits? My 32-bit / 768 MB Toshiba Tecra S1 notebook was able to do a full opensolaris release build in ~ 4 hours 45 minutes (gcc shadow compilation disabled; using an lzjb compressed zpool / zfs on a single notebook hdd p-ata drive). After upgrading to 2007-05-25 opensolaris release bits
2008 Apr 09
2
New patches to Souffleur
Hello all, I am really excited to post these new patches since a lot of things have been done to the software lately. I know, I still have to write a README file but I am struggling to get a "basic" functional version out before I can concentrate efforts on documentation (I know, not the best practice). Anyway, here we go with the diffs and its comments: * MediaInfo.py.diff
2004 Sep 24
4
ssh security
Derek Ragona wrote: >> I tried to implement a similar scheme in my hosts.allow on a FreeBSD >> 5.2.1 server. But when I try to test it from an IP outside my LAN, it >> still allows ssh logins. I even put in a line in hosts.allow to >> explicitly deny the IP I was ssh'ing from, but it still let me in. >> The behavior gives the appearance that TCP wrappers
2004 Jan 05
2
Codec Negotiation Does not seem to work as expected ?? Help Please !!
Hello, I have been trying to get my coders to work without a conversion. I have read all the available asterisk documentation and support groups without any luck. Here is my issue. (Please feel free to ask questions if you do not understand what I am talking about.) I am using Cisco ATA-186 set to g729 codec. (But it will switch to g711 if sip-server request g711) I have 2 SIP-services to
2007 Mar 05
1
Missing blocks
Hopefully this is a simple issue or just my ignorance on the results returned by "df -k" but can anyone explain why the available block is 0 if total 1k-blocks - Used is greater than 0? #df -k /ems/bigdisk/ Filesystem 1K-blocks Used Available Use% Mounted on /dev/mapper/vg0-bigdisk 397367512 383562960 0 100% /<name> Filesystem volume
2004 Jan 05
0
Codec Negotiation Does not seem to work as e xpected ?? Help Please !!
Steve, My Problem is not a problem, with the codec negotiation between end points. But when asterisk does it with canreinvite=no, * do not do it right. I replied with a lengthy discussion about my findings here, This behavior can be reproduced. But '*' do not seem to do the negotiation correctly. http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-users/2004-January/032197.html
2010 Feb 08
1
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 7110] New: Symlink fake-super data is silently lost when sys_lsetxattr fails with EPERM
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7110 Summary: Symlink fake-super data is silently lost when sys_lsetxattr fails with EPERM Product: rsync Version: 3.1.0 Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: major Priority: P3 Component: core AssignedTo: wayned at