Displaying 20 results from an estimated 90 matches similar to: "sun (oracle) 7110 zfs low performace fith high latency and high disc util."
2007 Apr 05
1
tools for performace testing
Hi Xen Users,
I''d like to run some performance tests with Xen. Are there some (sort of) standard test-cases or tooling? I''m thinking about using the Linux Test Project''s "Database Opensource Test Suite" (http://ltp.sourceforge.net)
Does someone have any experience with this? Other recommendations?
Thanks.
Regards,
Gábor
2013 Jun 07
0
Bad performace for NV18 driver
On Fri, Jun 7, 2013 at 5:56 PM, Carlos Garces <carlos.garces at gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi!
>
> I have some strange results on my test with nouveau drivers
>
> I'm using a old GeForce4 MX 4000 (NV18) with 128 MB.
>
> I have made 2 test.
>
> -The default configuration, using nomodeset without nouveau_vieux_dri.so
>
> $inxi -G
> Graphics: Card: NVIDIA NV18
2014 Jul 22
1
asterisk performace 64bits
Hello,
I'm running Asterisk on a CentOS 64-bit server. . Asterisk if I compile
using the ./configure --libdir=/usr/lib64 instead of ./configure have a
relative gain performace.? Has anyone done any comparison?
Is there any way in the compilation or even in settings that I can improve
the performace of the asterisk?
tks
Eduardo
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was
2012 Apr 28
1
SMB2 write performace slower than SMB1 in 10Gb network
Hi forks:
I've been testing SMB2 with samba 3.6.4 performance these days,
and I find a weird benchmark that SMB2 write performance is
slower than SMB1 in 10Gb ethernet network.
Server
-----------------------
Linux: Redhat Enterprise 6.1 x64
Kernel: 2.6.31 x86_64
Samba: 3.6.4 (almost using the default configuration)
Network: Chelsio T4 T420-SO-CR 10GbE network adapter
RAID:
Adaptec 51645 RAID
2005 Jun 23
2
Management: Reload performace & Realtime performance ?
Hello,
I am interested in some management-performance issues:
1st Scenario:
A management tool (for example a webbased one) has the following process:
- write in database
- read with script (for example perl) data from db and write conf files
- reload asterisk
I was reading around in the mailing lists and people say reloading is
stable. Now this tool has to manage 1000 clients so the conf
2006 Nov 08
1
Looking for new ideas to improve linux router performace
Hello,
I have 2 dual CPU Xeon 3Ghz HT enabled Linux routers and each one of them
serving 2 class C with pick traffic on router about 300Mbit full duplex
2 x Ethernet controller: Intel Corporation 82546GB Gigabit Ethernet
Controller (rev 03)
1GB ram
And
2 x Ethernet controller: Broadcom Corporation NetXtreme BCM5703 Gigabit
Ethernet (rev 10)
1GB ram
Both routers have about 600
2013 Oct 25
1
GlusterFS 3.4 Fuse client Performace
Dear GlusterFS Engineer,
I have questions that my glusterfs server and fuse client
perform properly on below specification.
It can write only *65MB*/s through FUSE client to 1 glusterfs server (1
brick and no replica for 1 volume )
- NW bandwidth are enough for now. I've check it with iftop
- However it can write *120MB*/s when I mount nfs on the same volume.
Could anyone check if the
2009 Jul 09
1
merge performace degradation in 2.9.1
I have noticed a significant performance degradation using merge in 2.9.1
relative to 2.8.1. Here is what I observed:
N <- 100000
X <- data.frame(group=rep(12:1, each=N), mon=rep(rev(month.abb), each=N))
X$mon <- as.character(X$mon)
Y <- data.frame(mon=month.abb, letter=letters[1:12])
Y$mon <- as.character(Y$mon)
Z <- cbind(Y, group=1:12)
system.time(Out
2013 Jun 07
2
Bad performace for NV18 driver
Hi!
I have some strange results on my test with nouveau drivers
I'm using a old GeForce4 MX 4000 (NV18) with 128 MB.
I have made 2 test.
-The default configuration, using nomodeset without nouveau_vieux_dri.so
$inxi -G
Graphics: Card: NVIDIA NV18 [GeForce4 MX 4000]
X.Org: 1.12.4 drivers: vesa,nouveau (unloaded: fbdev)
Resolution: 1024x768 at 0.0hz
GLX Renderer: N/A
2012 Sep 29
1
quota severe performace issue help
Dear gluster experts,
We have encountered a severe performance issue related to quota feature of
gluster.
My underlying fs is lvm with xfs format.
The problem is if quota is enabled the io performance is about 26MB/s but
with quota disabled the io performance is 216MB/s.
Any one known what's the problem? BTW I have reproduce it several times and
it is related to quota indeed.
Here's the
2013 Jun 08
1
Bad performace for NV18 driver
After update the system now I use:
Kernel 3.9.2
x server 1.12.4
nouveau 1.0.7
the xorg config are at:
http://pastebin.com/2LUxLiVs
It's the one installed by my distro, without any modification
I have made 2 test.
Normal boot
Xorg at http://pastebin.com/reZdAXEF
GLX Renderer is detected as GLX "Mesa DRI nv18 x86/MMX+/3DNow!+/SSE GLX"
Same configuration with nomodeset
Xorg log
2007 Feb 18
3
CentOS 4.4-IBM Netvista Performace Problems, help needed.
I've got an odd situation that I need some advise on. I have two
computers that I am planning to use as a cluster. I initially started
with some left over Compaq Presairos with 667MHz CPUs. I loaded CentOS
4.3 and later updated to 4.4. Things ran normally, albeit slowly. I
had an opportunity to upgrade to a pair of IBM Netvistas with 2.26 GHz
CPUs, I did this by transferring the
2008 Jul 24
13
performace of disks
Hello,
Queries:
1 - what is the best RAID (0,1,5,10,50) for server running very, very
VM instances ???
2 - and config of stripes/element sizes (32, 64, 128, 256, etc, KB) ??
3 - in the configuration of VM, exit one difference in performance
between image file (disk:/) or LVM partition (phy:/) ???
any URL or docs for read about this theme ?
mmm.. it is all for moment.
thanks
--
--
Victor
2007 May 29
6
Deterioration with zfs performace and recent zfs bits?
Has anyone else noticed a significant zfs performance deterioration
when running recent opensolaris bits?
My 32-bit / 768 MB Toshiba Tecra S1 notebook was able to do a
full opensolaris release build in ~ 4 hours 45 minutes (gcc shadow
compilation disabled; using an lzjb compressed zpool / zfs on a
single notebook hdd p-ata drive).
After upgrading to 2007-05-25 opensolaris release bits
2008 Apr 09
2
New patches to Souffleur
Hello all,
I am really excited to post these new patches since a lot of things
have been done to the software lately. I know, I still have to write a
README file but I am struggling to get a "basic" functional version out
before I can concentrate efforts on documentation (I know, not the best
practice).
Anyway, here we go with the diffs and its comments:
* MediaInfo.py.diff
2004 Sep 24
4
ssh security
Derek Ragona wrote:
>> I tried to implement a similar scheme in my hosts.allow on a FreeBSD
>> 5.2.1 server. But when I try to test it from an IP outside my LAN, it
>> still allows ssh logins. I even put in a line in hosts.allow to
>> explicitly deny the IP I was ssh'ing from, but it still let me in.
>> The behavior gives the appearance that TCP wrappers
2004 Jan 05
2
Codec Negotiation Does not seem to work as expected ?? Help Please !!
Hello,
I have been trying to get my coders to work without a conversion. I have
read all the available asterisk documentation and support groups without
any luck. Here is my issue. (Please feel free to ask questions if you do
not understand what I am talking about.)
I am using Cisco ATA-186 set to g729 codec. (But it will switch to g711 if
sip-server request g711)
I have 2 SIP-services to
2007 Mar 05
1
Missing blocks
Hopefully this is a simple issue or just my ignorance on the results
returned by "df -k" but can anyone explain why the available block is 0
if total 1k-blocks - Used is greater than 0?
#df -k /ems/bigdisk/
Filesystem 1K-blocks Used
Available Use% Mounted on
/dev/mapper/vg0-bigdisk 397367512 383562960
0 100% /<name>
Filesystem volume
2004 Jan 05
0
Codec Negotiation Does not seem to work as e xpected ?? Help Please !!
Steve,
My Problem is not a problem, with the codec negotiation between end points.
But when asterisk does it with canreinvite=no, * do not do it right. I
replied with a lengthy discussion about my findings here, This behavior can
be reproduced. But '*' do not seem to do the negotiation correctly.
http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-users/2004-January/032197.html
2010 Feb 08
1
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 7110] New: Symlink fake-super data is silently lost when sys_lsetxattr fails with EPERM
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7110
Summary: Symlink fake-super data is silently lost when
sys_lsetxattr fails with EPERM
Product: rsync
Version: 3.1.0
Platform: All
OS/Version: All
Status: NEW
Severity: major
Priority: P3
Component: core
AssignedTo: wayned at