similar to: aclmode -> no zfs in heterogeneous networks anymore?

Hi list, while preparing for the changed ACL/mode_t mapping semantics coming with onnv-147 [1], I discovered that in onnv-134 on my system ACLs are not inherited when aclmode is set to passthrough for the filesystem. This very much puzzles me. Example: $ uname -a SunOS os 5.11 snv_134 i86pc i386 i86pc $ pwd /Volumes/ACLs/dir1 $ zfs list | grep /Volumes rpool/Volumes 7,00G 39,7G 6,84G

Hi @all, with ZFS its recommended to create a new filesystem, for example for each user to give them a home directory. So far, so good. The homes should be under tank/export/home/staff and my intention is to restrict the ACL rights so only the user self can access his own home directory. I study the ZFS Admin Guide and found the aclmode and aclinherit options, IMHO for my intention the

On Sat, 11 Mar 2017 08:18:26 +0100 "Niels Dettenbach \(Syndicat IT & Internet\) via samba" <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > Am 11. März 2017 00:04:13 MEZ schrieb Andrew Walker via samba > <samba at lists.samba.org>: > >I don't believe that ZFS on FreeBSD supports acltype=posixacl and > >sa-based > > If you want to see a working samba / zfs

I have OSol 2009.06 (b111a), and I''m not sure I''m getting this ZFS ACL thing: %whoami abalfour % ls -V file ----------+ 1 abalfour root 1474560 May 11 18:43 file owner@:-w--d--A-W-C--:-------:deny according to that ACL I shouldn''t be able to write anything having to do with file, correct? % cat >> file zsh: permission denied: file % mv file

Do we have enormous fragmentation here on our X4500 with Solaris 10, ZFS Version 10? What except zfs send/receive can be done to free the fragmented space? One ZFS was used for some month to store some large disk images (each 50GByte large) which are copied there with rsync. This ZFS then reports 6.39TByte usage with zfs list and only 2TByte usage with du. The other ZFS was used for similar

All, Running Samba 3.5.4 on Solaris 10 with ZFS file system. I have issues where we have shared group folders. In these folders a userA in GroupA create file just fine with the correct inherited permissions 660. Problem is when userB in GroupA reads and modifies that file, with M$ office apps, the permissions get whacked to 060+ and the file becomes read only by everyone. I did

On 2016-01-15, ROWLAND PENNY wrote: > Try running 'samba -b' this will show you where the AD DC expects to > find things, you should be able to work out from there what needs > changing on your system. Ok thanks. I wasn't sure which of the listed directories was important. I ran samba-tool with debug 9 and I think the issue is where it tries to create the sysvol volume,

A "good" acl manual. http://www.vanemery.com/Linux/ACL/linux-acl.html As i do prefeer the debian os, but i do really like the archlinux wiki. https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Access_Control_Lists Greetz, Louis > -----Oorspronkelijk bericht----- > Van: samba [mailto:samba-bounces at lists.samba.org] Namens Frank Kahle > Verzonden: dinsdag 2 augustus 2016 13:55

Hi, S10U3: It seems, that ufs POSIX-ACLs are not properly translated to zfs ACL4 entries, when one xfers a directory tree from UFS to ZFS. Test case: Assuming one has an user A and B, both belonging to group G and having their umask set to 022: 1) On UFS - as user A do: mkdir /dir chmod 0775 /dir setfacl -m d:u::rwx,d:g::rwx,d:o:r-x,d:m:rwx /dir # samba would

Hi, Just playing with zfs and the admin manual ... # mkfile 100m /export/zfs/disk1 # zpool create data /export/zfs/disk1 # zfs create data/users # zfs mount -o remount,noatime data/users # zfs get all data/users NAME PROPERTY VALUE SOURCE data/users type filesystem - data/users creation Mon Nov 20 11:25 2006

This is the first time I tried nfs with zfs. I shared the zfs filesystem with nfs, but i can''t write to the files though i mount it as read-write. This is for Solaris 10 update 4. I wonder if there is a bug? ---------------server (sdw2-2) #zfs create -o sharenfs=on data/nfstest #zfs get all data/nfstest NAME PROPERTY VALUE SOURCE data/nfstest type

I have samba 4.3 running on FreeBSD 10.2 on ZFS and I am unable to create new GPOs, getting "invalid Parameter" response.Log files indicate ACL issues. Domain was provisioned with --use-ntvfs option.Filesystem is mounted with this options:zroot/ROOT/default on / (zfs, local, noatime, nfsv4acls) acl options on zfs are this:zroot/ROOT/default aclmode passthrough inherited from

I''m currently prototyping a Solaris file server that will dish out user home directories and group project directories via NFSv4 and Samba. I have samba configured and integrated into our local active directory, with ACL mapping working. I''m a little confused as to the behavior of the ZFS ACL though. on a brand-new filesystem, touching a file results in: -rw-r--r-- 1 root

Hi everyone, I have just installed Solaris and have added a 3x500GB raidz drive array. I am able to use this pool (''tank'') successfully locally, but when I try to share it remotely, I can only read, I cannot execute or write. I didn''t do anything other than the default ''zfs set sharenfs=on tank''... how can I get it so that any allowed user can access

Hi everyone, I have just installed Solaris and have added a 3x500GB raidz drive array. I am able to use this pool (''tank'') successfully locally, but when I try to share it remotely, I can only read, I cannot execute or write. I didn''t do anything other than the default ''zfs set sharenfs=on tank''... how can I get it so that any allowed user can access

I have Googled my brains out without success, and I'm hoping that someone here can give me some tips. I'm trying to build a new file server, and I've concluded that ZFS is the technology that I want to use. After doing some research I settled on FreeBSD 10 as the platform to provide it. I have an existing AD domain (two Samba 4.1.4 DCs running on Debian) and the file server will be

On Sat, February 7, 2009 14:32, Alan.M.Wright wrote: >>> Also, does this end up taking up extra metadata space compared to not >>> having to have an ACL entry for each file? > > No, ZFS only stores ACLs. It doesn''t have or store a separate > representation of the UNIX permissions bits. So I won''t worry about it. I still worry when I see 11 ACL

Hello forum. I''m in the process of re-organizing my server and ACL-settings. I''ve seen so many different ways of doing ACL, which makes me wonder how I should do it myself. This is obviously the easiest way, only describing the positive permissions: /usr/bin/chmod -R A=\ group:sa:full_set:fd:allow,\ group:vk:read_set:fd:allow \ However, I''ve seen people split each

Hi all, I'd appreciate any pointers or advise regarding the following issue with files written by M$ Office on Samba 3.0.32 on snv_98 (OpenSolaris) on a ZFS filesystem: samba share: [sharename] read only = No browseable = yes writeable = yes directory mask = 0770 create mask = 0770 delete readonly = Yes acl check permissions =

Hi All, I''d like to ask about whether there is a method to enforce a certain txg commit frequency on ZFS. I''m doing a large amount of video streaming from a storage pool while also slowly continuously writing a constant volume of data to it (using a normal file descriptor, *not* in O_SYNC). When reading volume goes over a certain threshold (and average pool load over ~50%), ZFS