similar to: zfs-discuss Digest, Vol 64, Issue 21

I have a box running snv_134 that had a little boo-boo. The problem first started a couple of weeks ago with some corruption on two filesystems in a 11 disk 10tb raidz2 set. I ran a couple of scrubs that revealed a handful of corrupt files on my 2 de-duplicated zfs filesystems. No biggie. I thought that my problems had something to do with de-duplication in 134, so I went about the process of

Hello, after update to 5.1 the smartctl will fail. I get this output: smartctl --all -d ata /dev/sda smartctl version 5.36 [i686-redhat-linux-gnu] Copyright (C) 2002-6 Bruce Allen Home page is http://smartmontools.sourceforge.net/ === START OF INFORMATION SECTION === Device Model: HDS728080PLA380 Serial Number: XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX Firmware Version: PF2OA69A User Capacity: 82.348.277.760

> <sebastian.vuorinen@helsinki.fi> wrote: > > On Wed, 2005-04-20 at 18:34 -0700, Steve Nospam > > wrote: > > > I have to admit,I'm ignorant. I'm seeing a > > problem > > > reported in syslog (2.6.11.7 kernel debian > dist.) > > The > > > problem reported is: > > > Apr 20 20:19:53 sandbox kernel: hda: drive_cmd: >

Hi all. I have a CentOS server: CentOS release 5.7 (Final) 2.6.18-274.3.1.el5 x86_64 I have two SSD disks attached: smartctl -i /dev/sdc smartctl version 5.38 [x86_64-redhat-linux-gnu] Copyright (C) 2002-8 Bruce Allen Home page is http://smartmontools.sourceforge.net/ === START OF INFORMATION SECTION === Device Model: INTEL SSDSA2CW120G3 Serial Number: CVPR13010957120LGN Firmware

On Feb 3, 2016, at 17:10, Warren Young wrote: > smartctl can see through several different types of RAID controller to the underlying physical disks via its -d option. This is what I have: # smartctl --all /dev/sda smartctl 5.43 2012-06-30 r3573 [i686-linux-2.6.32-573.12.1.el6.i686] (local build) Copyright (C) 2002-12 by Bruce Allen, http://smartmontools.sourceforge.net Vendor:

Hi, I get these below information. Please help me understand about "SMART Health Status: FAILURE PREDICTION THRESHOLD EXCEEDED: ascq=0x5 [asc=5d, ascq=5]" and what does that error mean. Does it mean that the SAS disk 0 is failing and has serious issues and needs to be replaced and also do i need to run health status test with different options/flags or switches. /usr/sbin/smartctl -d

> -----Original Message----- > From: Jason Pyeron > Sent: Saturday, February 07, 2015 22:54 > > NOTE: this is happening on Centos 6 x86_64, > 2.6.32-504.3.3.el6.x86_64 not Centos 5 > > Dell PowerEdge 2970, Seagate SATA drive, non-raid. > > I have this server which has been dying randomly, with no logs. Here is a console picture. http://i.imgur.com/ZYHlB82.jpg

I've just installed my first system with a SATA drive and I've noticed that smartctl isn't supported under libata According to the smartmontools home page, SATA will require a patch that is still in development. http://www.linuxjournal.com/article/6983#comment-126714 "The patch is still under development and it is probably best to make sure that the disk is idle before trying

Hi, The server is running CentOS 5.8 Linux OS on Dell PowerEdge R710 having raid controller card 03:00.0 RAID bus controller: LSI Logic /Symbios Logic MegaRAID SAS 2108 [Liberator] (rev 05) /usr/sbin/smartctl -a /dev/sda smartctl version 5.38 [x86_64-redhat-linux-gnu] Copyright (C) 2002-8 Bruce Allen Home page is http://smartmontools.sourceforge.net/ Device: DELL PERC H700 Version: 2.10 DELL

On a headless C7 server (actually a pogoplug with the Redsleeve 7 distro), I have a usb attached backup drive (what other type of drives can you have on a pogoplug other than usb? :) ). I had reformated the partition as ext4: # parted /dev/sdb print Model: WD My Book 1230 (scsi) Disk /dev/sdb: 3001GB Sector size (logical/physical): 4096B/4096B Partition Table: msdos Disk Flags: Number Start

On Wed, 2015-08-05 at 13:11 -0400, Bowie Bailey wrote: > > # smartctl -i /dev/hdg | grep -i sector > > Sector Size: 512 bytes logical/physical > I don't get a "Sector Size" line. > > smartctl version 5.38 [i686-redhat-linux-gnu] Copyright (C) 2002-8 Bruce > Allen On the latest Centos 5 = Centos 5.11 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~ smartctl -v smartctl 5.42

I finally fixed my drive error problem. This has been going on quite a while. I've posted before with no success on getting this fixed. I was getting these errors. Dec 4 04:03:10 bikesn4x4s kernel: hda: dma_intr: status=0x51 { DriveReady SeekComplete Error } Dec 4 04:03:10 bikesn4x4s kernel: hda: dma_intr: error=0x84 { DriveStatusError BadCRC } And now for the amazing smartctl -a

On 8/5/2015 1:00 PM, Chris Murphy wrote: > On Wed, Aug 5, 2015 at 10:52 AM, Bowie Bailey <Bowie_Bailey at buc.com> wrote: >> How would I go about pointing it at the partition? >> >> What I am currently doing is this: >> device (hd0) /dev/hdg >> root (hd0,0) >> setup (hd0) > > setup (hd1,0) > > It's hd1 if your device map is correct and

Il 21/10/2016 17:20, m.roth at 5-cent.us ha scritto: > John R Pierce wrote: >> On 10/21/2016 2:03 AM, Alessandro Baggi wrote: >>> >>> My ssds are failing? >> >> SSD's wear out based on writes per block. they distribute those >> writes, but once each block has been written X number of times, they are >> no longer reliable. >> >>

On Wed, Aug 5, 2015 at 11:11 AM, Bowie Bailey <Bowie_Bailey at buc.com> wrote: > On 8/5/2015 1:00 PM, Chris Murphy wrote: >> >> On Wed, Aug 5, 2015 at 10:52 AM, Bowie Bailey <Bowie_Bailey at buc.com> >> wrote: >>> >>> How would I go about pointing it at the partition? >>> >>> What I am currently doing is this: >>> device

I've got a 1Tb USB disc that appears to be dying - eg it took about 10 days (!) to run 'badblocks -nsv /dev/sdc' and it only did less than 2% in that time. Read access became _really_ slow. So there's definitely something amiss and I've got it offline. There's no drama about the content as I have other backups and I'm resigned to junking the thing, but I'm curious

I've seen similar cases where a USB drive appears to fail but the SMART reports success. The most recent was a 500 GB disk which had internally a Seagate Barracuda SATA drive. It appeared to work well until I sent it a largish (7GB) tarball. As well as SMART I ran a surface check and exercise, all passed. The tar kept failing. I can't test further, the disk has been broken up for

Ok....so after installing "smartmontools" on my CentOS machine...and connectiing this drive externally...i got positive reports from both the short and long tests...so the drive can obviously be "seen"....but when I look for it in the /dev/ directory...it doesn't show up.....I'm about to give the fdisk command line tools anonther shot....it allows me to format the

If y'all remember the problem I posted a while back, with a 3TB drive for userspace loosing it on a server, and spitting DRDY errors, but which work on everything else. Well, enough research, and conversation, and I may have found the problem: it's a Caviar Green, meant for a desktop, and the controller in the server has issues, because it uses TLER:

My wife's box has a very intermittent problem, when booting from the Maxtor IDE hard drive. This has been going on for about 2 1/2 years.... The box is a Compaq EVO D300v for the Enterprise. When it boots, there is a SMART advisory from the BIOS that says failure is immenient. Occasionally, it will not boot, because the BIOS does not see the hard drive. I replaced the EIDE cable, but the