similar to: last thought before switching to ZFS

Well after some hunting arround I have discovered that I must use the autogen.sh script. The errors from the autogen script tole me what packages I nede to load to run the script. The only package that I had to build was the autoconf 2.57 package. Now the autogen script gets to the point of checking verson of bison... 1.35 ok, then gices and error of './configure[5562]: syntax error:

> -----Original Message----- > From: centos-bounces at centos.org [mailto:centos-bounces at centos.org] On > Behalf Of Gordon Messmer > Sent: Monday, October 3, 2016 4:25 PM > To: CentOS mailing list > Subject: Re: [CentOS] Virtualization Networking > > On 10/03/2016 04:54 AM, TE Dukes wrote: > > I can get the guest to access the internet but have tried every was

Hi Rowland, Thanks for getting back to me, appreciate your time and help. Apologies for the long response, I have tried to include as much information as possible. On Friday, 19 January 2024 at 10:12, Rowland Penny via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > Sorry to be so long in replying to this, but life got in the way. > > You initially had an incorrect smb.conf and you

On Wednesday, 24 January 2024 at 20:45, Rowland Penny via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > That is what I was looking for, the default 'idmap config' is set to > 'hash', which shouldn't be used. Especially as it says 'idmap_hash - DO > NOT USE THIS BACKEND' at the top of 'man idmap_hash'. I can understand > using it for existing

On Fri, 19 Jan 2024 10:12:12 +0000 Rowland Penny via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > On Tue, 16 Jan 2024 23:28:24 +0000 > unraidster via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > > > On Tuesday, 16 January 2024 at 09:46, Rowland Penny via samba > > <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > > > > > As far as I can see, unraid is based on

On Tue, 23 Jan 2024 21:47:27 +0000 unraidster via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > Hi Rowland, > > Thanks for getting back to me, appreciate your time and help. > Apologies for the long response, I have tried to include as much > information as possible. > > On Friday, 19 January 2024 at 10:12, Rowland Penny via samba > <samba at lists.samba.org>

On Wed, 24 Jan 2024 17:31:46 +0000 unraidster via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > Hi, > > I assumed that the rearranged config you provided was for feedback, Yes, they were just comments, but unraid should really fix their Samba setup. > I > haven't made any changes to the configuration based on those > comments. I'll send a message to the Unraid

On Tue, 16 Jan 2024 23:28:24 +0000 unraidster via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > On Tuesday, 16 January 2024 at 09:46, Rowland Penny via samba > <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > > > As far as I can see, unraid is based on slackware, so it should > > work. Is it possible to check the ownership & permissions set on > > /mnt/user/PrivateShare

Hi all, This is my first message to the list. I've been experimenting with running dovecot on my unRAID server (basically, a parity-protected array of disks, running on a slackware 13.1 platform). Someone on the unRAID forum had built a binary distribution of dovecot 1.1.20 and I got this up and running without too much trouble. Today, I've been building the latest dovecot release

I’ve tried that post .. but either I get a new scsi passthrough controller in device manager, but no dvd or the boot in windows hangs Either that method won’t work anymore or my config is bad .. im not really sure what to put in controller, target, bus and unit .. Skickat från min iPad > 17 apr. 2020 kl. 08:38 skrev Tony Brian Albers <tba@kb.dk>: > > Hi Andreas, > >

On 10/03/2016 04:54 AM, TE Dukes wrote: > I can get the guest to access the internet but have tried every was possible > to be able to access the guest from the LAN or even the host. Nothing I have > tried works. > > The only thing all documentation leaves out is how to set up the guest > networking during the install. "All documentation" doesn't leave out this

On Tuesday, 16 January 2024 at 09:46, Rowland Penny via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > As far as I can see, unraid is based on slackware, so it should work. > Is it possible to check the ownership & permissions set on > /mnt/user/PrivateShare ? > > Is either apparmor or selinux running ? > > Rowland Thanks for the reply, I have included some responses

On Wednesday, 24 January 2024 at 10:51, Rowland Penny via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > I rearranged the smb.conf above and added comments: > > [global] > netbios name = Tower > server string = Media server > security = USER > workgroup = WORKGROUP > bind interfaces only = yes > interfaces = 192.168.66.10/24 127.0.0.1 > > # we don't do

2020-04-17 11:37 skrev Peter Krempa: > [please don't top post] > > On Fri, Apr 17, 2020 at 10:54:24 +0200, Andreas Thörn wrote: >> I’ve tried that post .. but either I get a new scsi passthrough >> controller in device manager, but no dvd or the boot in windows hangs > > Note that you don't have to add a scsi <controller> if you already have > one.

On Thu, 11 Jan 2024 08:53:38 +0000 unraidster via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > Hello, > > Issue Description > After the upgrade of the Unraid server OS (unraid.net) from v6.9.2 to > v6.12.6 (which upgrades the version of Samba from 4.12.14 to 4.17.12) > access to shares stops working. > > Error Summary: > [2024/01/07 21:52:43.357676, 0, pid=93992,

[please don't top post] On Fri, Apr 17, 2020 at 10:54:24 +0200, Andreas Thörn wrote: > I’ve tried that post .. but either I get a new scsi passthrough controller in device manager, but no dvd or the boot in windows hangs Note that you don't have to add a scsi <controller> if you already have one. You can add the drive to the existing one. > > Either that method won’t

Suppose I have a table ''items'' with the attribute ''bool'' which is boolean. There''s an array @attribs which holds :bool and some other symbols of attributes which are not boolean. class Item < ActiveRecord::Base { def attribs [:bool , :x , :y] end } The trouble is that @item.bool? and @item.bool behave differently. If I set @item.bool=5

Hello everyone, I have the code below: paginator_options.merge!({:conditions => ''cities.id = 4'', :include => [:cities]}) @people_pages, @people = paginate :people, paginator_options There''s a many-to-many relationship between people and cities. It seemed like before this was working, but now in the sql that''s generated the join table isn''t

I suggest getting rid of the hash style arguments fior new() for this package. In this particular case, you already have a class and accessors, so you can just use the yield trick, e.g. rb_yield(self) if rb_block_given_p(). Thus you can do: mm = Mmap.new do |m| m.namespace = file m.swapfile = sfile m.size = 1024 end Looks just as nice, and is a lot less code on the C side of

Two questions here... Im using 2.0 as my NAT gw box between my cable modem and my internal home network. #1 - Shaping Implementation How would I configure shorewall to give the highest priority for traffic to & from an IP address on my internal network. Maybe Im being a bit dense, but I couldnt figure it out. #2 - SSH & Shaping Strategy Well I managed to figure out how to give ssh