similar to: [patch] no crumbs

=== 1. Camping on Rack === I''ve just finished rewriting Camping to use Rack in the "core". I got rid of (a little less) than 1kB in camping.rb and removed lots of un-necessary files (lib/server/*.rb, fastcgi.rb & mongrel.rb). bin/camping does now only provide WEBrick, Mongrel and console-support and should only be used in development. It uses Rack::ShowExceptions to catch

what is the cleanest way to do something for every request of a particular type (Verb, and Content-Type header)? i''m trying to figure out if shipping a custom camping.rb is avoidable, and if, how i should structure a patch my app http://whats-your.name/yard/ uses exclusively JSON based messaging between server and client. this means POST bodies are JSON, and not querystring.. camping

22 sudo mv camping.rb camping-abridged.rb 23 sudo mv camping-unabridged.rb camping.rb when running into problems, the abridged version of camping is rather difficult to debug. so I''m moving to unabridged, but I''m getting this error. [Mon Jul 24 15:50:18 2006] [error] [client 192.168.11.100]

Hi everybody, I would like to use ruby2ruby in a caming project, but there seems to be an incompatibility with camping, ruby2ruby and markaby. Unfortunately I receive strange Markaby::InvalidXhtmlErrors. To demonstrate, that only combination of all three components causes the problem I added the following code. I relies on Markaby and ruby2ruby only and works fine (a.k.a. as expected).

Hey, campineros. And many good handshakes to zimbatm for getting some patches applied. So, yeah, I''d really like to get rid of any serious dependancies with this 1.6 release. Anything that''s not in stdlib has to go. Of course, camping-omnibus will still assume the whole ActiveRecord, Markaby, Mongrel setup that''s in the history books. Metaid can be removed and

query strings built by R method can''t handle multiple values from checkbox selections R(SomeRoute, :reply_status=>%w{1 2 4}) should return query_string=" http://localhost:3301/someroute/?reply_status_id=1&reply_status_id=2&reply_status_id=4 " qsp(query_string) -> {"reply_status_id"=>["1", "2", "4"]} from

UNSUBSCRIBE On Oct 5, 2007, at 1:27 PM, camping-list-request at rubyforge.org wrote: > Send Camping-list mailing list submissions to > camping-list at rubyforge.org > > To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit > http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/camping-list > or, via email, send a message with subject or body ''help'' to >

I''ve just sent a pull-request to _why with my changes[1] and here is some things that I think needs to be done before a (possible) release: * The cookie session is named Camping::Session and is placed in camping/session.rb. Maybe this should be called Camping::CookieSession or??? * The ActiveRecord session is named Camping::ARSession and is placed in camping/ar/session.rb. Maybe it

Puppet 3.0.2-rc3 is a bugfix release candidate for the 3.x series of Puppet. This release candidate fixes bug #10963. To see a list of the issues addressed by this release, check out the 3.0.2 version in our issue tracter at: https://projects.puppetlabs.com/versions/337 Downloads are available at: * Source https://downloads.puppetlabs.com/puppet/puppet-3.0.2-rc3.tar.gz RPMs are available at

on like 257 of camping-unabridged.rb: > # "http" + URL("/view/12") #=> "http://test.ing/blog/view/12" is wrong, the string should be "http:", or the result will be "http// test.ing/blob/view/12" ? Jenna ?Who Isn''t a? Fox

As far as I can tell, sending an actual HTTP PUT request to a Camping app will never parse the params out of the request body - or am I going nuts? This code seems to say only POST''s will parse the request body: elsif @method == "post" and \ e.CONTENT_TYPE == "application/x-www-form-urlencoded" q.u(C.qsp(@in.read)) end I looked for an easy spot to stick

Implement simple paravirt support for the qspinlock. Provide a separate (second) version of the spin_lock_slowpath for paravirt along with a special unlock path. The second slowpath is generated by adding a few pv hooks to the normal slowpath, but where those will compile away for the native case, they expand into special wait/wake code for the pv version. The actual MCS queue can use extra

Implement simple paravirt support for the qspinlock. Provide a separate (second) version of the spin_lock_slowpath for paravirt along with a special unlock path. The second slowpath is generated by adding a few pv hooks to the normal slowpath, but where those will compile away for the native case, they expand into special wait/wake code for the pv version. The actual MCS queue can use extra

Because the qspinlock needs to touch a second cacheline; add a pending bit and allow a single in-word spinner before we punt to the second cacheline. Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <peterz at infradead.org> --- include/asm-generic/qspinlock_types.h | 12 ++- kernel/locking/qspinlock.c | 109 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++------- 2 files changed, 97 insertions(+), 24 deletions(-)

On 06/15/2014 08:47 AM, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > > > > +#ifdef CONFIG_PARAVIRT_SPINLOCKS > + > +/* > + * Write a comment about how all this works... > + */ > + > +#define _Q_LOCKED_SLOW (2U<< _Q_LOCKED_OFFSET) > + > +struct pv_node { > + struct mcs_spinlock mcs; > + struct mcs_spinlock __offset[3]; > + int cpu, head; > +}; I am wondering why

On 06/15/2014 08:47 AM, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > > > > +#ifdef CONFIG_PARAVIRT_SPINLOCKS > + > +/* > + * Write a comment about how all this works... > + */ > + > +#define _Q_LOCKED_SLOW (2U<< _Q_LOCKED_OFFSET) > + > +struct pv_node { > + struct mcs_spinlock mcs; > + struct mcs_spinlock __offset[3]; > + int cpu, head; > +}; I am wondering why

From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz at infradead.org> Because the qspinlock needs to touch a second cacheline (the per-cpu mcs_nodes[]); add a pending bit and allow a single in-word spinner before we punt to the second cacheline. It is possible so observe the pending bit without the locked bit when the last owner has just released but the pending owner has not yet taken ownership. In this case

Dear All, I like to simulate a physiologically based pharmacokinetics model using R but am having a problem with the daspk routine. The same problem has been implemented in Berkeley madonna and Winbugs so that I know that it is working. However, with daspk it is not, and the numbers are everywhere! Please see the following and let me know if I am missing something... Thanks a lot in advance,

Add minimal paravirt support. The code aims for minimal impact on the native case. On the lock side we add one jump label (asm_goto) and 4 paravirt callee saved calls that default to NOPs. The only effects are the extra NOPs and some pointless MOVs to accomodate the calling convention. No register spills happen because of this (x86_64). On the unlock side we have one paravirt callee saved call,

I changed it to the below; I've not gotten around to compiling or even running it yet :-( The biggest change is the pv_hash/pv_unhash functions, which I've rewritten to hopefully be clearer (and also hopefully not wrecked them). I took out the cacheline sized structure which takes out that double loop and simplifies things. I've also added some comments which hopefully explain how/why