similar to: How do I clean up corrupted files from zpool status -v?

hi, i have raid1 on zfs with 2 device on pool first device died and boot from second not working... i try to get http://mfsbsd.vx.sk/ flash and load from it with zpool import http://puu.sh/2402E when i load zfs.ko and opensolaris.ko i see this message: Solaris: WARNING: Can''t open objset for zroot/var/crash Solaris: WARNING: Can''t open objset for zroot/var/crash zpool status:

Followed the instructions here: http://www.freebsd.org/doc/handbook/updating-upgrading-freebsdupdate.html The upgrade borked. Error message: Can't find 'kernel' When I checked with ls /boot/kernel/, the directory does exist. :-( Since the system has encrypted root partion with ZFSonROOT, I tried to follow instructions at https://forums.freebsd.org/viewtopic.php?&t=8958 to boot

Good morning, I have a problem with ZFS: ZFS filesystem version 4 ZFS storage pool version 15 Yesterday my comp with Freebsd 8.2 releng shutdown with ad4 error detached,when I copy a big file... and after reboot in 2 wd green 1tb say me goodbye. One of them die and other with zfs errors: Apr 24 04:53:41 Flash root: ZFS: vdev I/O failure, zpool=zroot path= offset=187921768448 size=512 error=6

Hi, I was trying to rebuild world on a FreeBSD 10 test system, that I had just installed. ZFS root was setup. I let the installation program do all the ZFS setup and configuration. I put root on a 5 disk encrypted raidz array. Besides the installer configuring 5 times the amount of swap space I asked for (asked for 8gb, installer put 8gb on each drive, for 40gb in total.) everything was working

I had a sparc64 (Netra X1) running a stable/9 from late March 2013. Actually, the kernel may've been a bit newer than that as I was working with folks to diagnose and repair some Netra-X1 specific issues. But, ZFS worked fine. I have two pools, zroot as a RAID1 (using equally sized partitions at the front of two large disks), and a zdata that is a large pool of the remaining space of both

I understand that currently, at least under Solaris 10u6, it is not possible to jumpstart a new system with a zfs root using a flash archive as a source. Can anyone comment as to whether this restriction will pass in the near term, or if this is a while out (6+ months) before this will be possible? Thanks, Jerry

-------- Original Message -------- Subject: Re: Dovecot 2.2.16: disappearing messages, mismatched summaries, duplicated messages, excessive full re-downloads From: Timo Sirainen <tss at iki.fi> To: David Gessel <gessel at blackrosetech.com> Date: Thu Apr 16 2015 21:31:30 GMT+0300 (Arabic Standard Time) > On 16 Apr 2015, at 04:45, David Gessel <gessel at blackrosetech.com>

Hi Folks.. We have started to convert our Veritas clustered systems over to ZFS root to take advantage of the extreme simplification of using Live Upgrade. Moving the data of these systems off VxVM and VxFS is not in scope for reasons to numerous to go into.. One thing my customers noticed immediately was a reduction in "free" memory as reported by ''top''. By way

Edgar, thanks for the help! -------- Original Message -------- Subject: Re: Dovecot 2.2.16: disappearing messages, mismatched summaries, duplicated messages, excessive full re-downloads From: Edgar Pettijohn III <edgar at pettijohn-web.com> To: David Gessel <gessel at blackrosetech.com> Date: Sat Apr 18 2015 16:30:07 GMT+0300 (Arabic Standard Time) > > On Apr 18, 2015, at 8:00

I have samba 4.3 running on FreeBSD 10.2 on ZFS and I am unable to create new GPOs, getting "invalid Parameter" response.Log files indicate ACL issues. Domain was provisioned with --use-ntvfs option.Filesystem is mounted with this options:zroot/ROOT/default on / (zfs, local, noatime, nfsv4acls) acl options on zfs are this:zroot/ROOT/default aclmode passthrough inherited from

Hi, I've got a problem with booting zfs-on-root FreeBSD 9.2-PRERELEASE. I'm getting: ZFS: i/o error - all block copies unavailable ZFS: can't read MOS of pool klawisz gptzfsboot: failed to mount default pool klawisz Machine is VM running under KVM on Proxmox 2.3-13. VM has 8 GB of RAM, 400 GB of local storage with SCSI Controller type: Default (lsi). I'm not sure what I did to

On Thu, July 23, 2020 15:56, Andrew Bartlett wrote: > > Clearly there is, as otherwise we could not be in waitpid on it. > The process is not a python process, it will be tdbbackup. The > command line arguments to that process will be instructive. Here it is: root 36800 0.8 0.0 12556 2788 1 SJ 16:49 0:00.01 /usr/local/bin/tdbbackup -s .copy.tdb

FreeBSD-12.1p6 IOCage thick jails on ZFS, samba-4.10.15: On Fri, July 10, 2020 02:29, Andrea Venturoli wrote: > On 2020-07-09 21:36, James B. Byrne via samba wrote: >> set_nt_acl_no_snum: fset_nt_acl returned NT_STATUS_INVALID_PARAMETER. >> ERROR(runtime): uncaught exception - (3221225485, 'An invalid parameter was >> passed to a service or function.') > > What

Hi. (Im am sending this to the "stable" list, because it maybe kernel related.. ) On 9.1-RELEASE I am witnessing lockups of the openldap slapd daemon. The slapd runs for some days and then hangs, consuming high amounts of CPU. In this state slapd can only be restarted by SIGKILL. # procstat -kk 71195 PID TID COMM TDNAME KSTACK 71195

Hello zfs question about memory. I heard zfs is very ram hungry. Service looking to run: - nginx - postgres - php-fpm - python I have a machine with two quad core cpus but only 4 G Memory I'm looking to buy more ram now. What would be the recommend amount of memory for zfs across 6 drives on this setup? Also can 9.1 now boot to zfs from the installer? (no tricks for post install) Thanks

Hi, I installed FreeBSD/amd64 9.1-RELEASE yesterday. I chose to do a manual installation due to the use of ZFS. I checked out stable/9 and recompiled both world and GENERIC kernel. Said kernel and world was installed without any problems. System is still up & running, with uname -a revealing r243825. I then decided to upgrade the root pool to feature flags, SPA version 5000, and was not so

-------- Original Message -------- Subject: Re: Dovecot 2.2.16: disappearing messages, mismatched summaries, duplicated messages, excessive full re-downloads From: Timo Sirainen <tss at iki.fi> To: David Gessel <gessel at blackrosetech.com> Date: Sat Apr 18 2015 15:48:28 GMT+0300 (Arabic Standard Time) > No. My best guess is that (your) ZFS+FreeBSD is simply not behaving the way

We have a production SunFireV240 that had a zfs mirror until this week. One of the drives (c1t3d0) in the mirror failed. The system was shutdown and the bad disk replaced without an export. I don''t know what happened next but by the time I got involved there was no evidence that the remaining good disk (c1t2d0) had ever been part of a ZFS mirror. Using dd on the raw device I can see data

According to man page, the only way it can return EINVAL (22) is either bad filter, or bad timeout. I can't see how the filter would be bad, so I'm guessing ts must be bad. Unfortunately I forgot to ask for it, so I am going to have to ask you run it again and run p ts if that's valid, then the only thing that can be bad if the file descriptor 23. Aki > On October 23, 2016 at

Ok so that timeval makes no sense. We'll look into it. Aki > On October 24, 2016 at 12:22 AM Larry Rosenman <larryrtx at gmail.com> wrote: > > > doveadm(mrm): Debug: http-client: conn 127.0.0.1:9998 [1]: Got 200 response > for request [Req38: PUT http://localhost:9998/tika/] (took 296 ms + 8 ms in > queue) > doveadm(mrm): Panic: kevent(): Invalid argument >