Displaying 20 results from an estimated 7000 matches similar to: "Erratic behavior on 24T zpool"
2009 Mar 28
53
Can this be done?
I currently have a 7x1.5tb raidz1.
I want to add "phase 2" which is another 7x1.5tb raidz1
Can I add the second phase to the first phase and basically have two
raid5''s striped (in raid terms?)
Yes, I probably should upgrade the zpool format too. Currently running
snv_104. Also should upgrade to 110.
If that is possible, would anyone happen to have the simple command
lines to
2011 May 28
7
Have my RMA... Now what??
I have a raidz2 pool with one disk that seems to be going bad, several errors are noted in iostat. I have an RMA for the drive, however - no I am wondering how I proceed. I need to send the drive in and then they will send me one back. If I had the drive on hand, I could do a zpool replace.
Do I do a zpool offline? zpool detach?
Once I get the drive back and put it in the same drive bay..
2009 Jul 10
5
Slow Resilvering Performance
I know this topic has been discussed many times... but what the hell
makes zpool resilvering so slow? I''m running OpenSolaris 2009.06.
I have had a large number of problematic disks due to a bad production
batch, leading me to resilver quite a few times, progressively
replacing each disk as it dies (and now preemptively removing disks.)
My complaint is that resilvering ends up
2007 Feb 27
16
understanding zfs/thunoer "bottlenecks"?
Currently I''m trying to figure out the best zfs layout for a thumper wrt. to read AND write performance.
I did some simple mkfile 512G tests and found out, that per average ~ 500 MB/s seems to be the maximum on can reach (tried initial default setup, all 46 HDDs as R0, etc.).
According to http://www.amd.com/us-en/assets/content_type/DownloadableAssets/ArchitectureWP_062806.pdf I would
2007 Oct 08
16
Fileserver performance tests
Hi all,
i want to replace a bunch of Apple Xserves with Xraids and HFS+ (brr) by Sun x4200 with SAS-Jbods and ZFS. The application will be the Helios UB+ fileserver suite.
I installed the latest Solaris 10 on a x4200 with 8gig of ram and two Sun SAS controllers, attached two sas-jbods with 8 SATA-HDDs each und created a zfs pool as a raid 10 by doing something like the following:
[i]zpool create
2009 Oct 14
14
ZFS disk failure question
So, my Areca controller has been complaining via email of read errors for a couple days on SATA channel 8. The disk finally gave up last night at 17:40. I got to say I really appreciate the Areca controller taking such good care of me.
For some reason, I wasn''t able to log into the server last night or in the morning, probably because my home dir was on the zpool with the failed disk
2007 Apr 02
4
Convert raidz
Hi
Is it possible to convert live 3 disks zpool from raidz to raidz2
And is it possible to add 1 new disk to raidz configuration without backups and recreating zpool from cratch.
Thanks
This message posted from opensolaris.org
2010 Jul 05
5
never ending resilver
Hi list,
Here''s my case :
pool: mypool
state: DEGRADED
status: One or more devices is currently being resilvered. The pool will
continue to function, possibly in a degraded state.
action: Wait for the resilver to complete.
scrub: resilver in progress for 147h19m, 100.00% done, 0h0m to go
config:
NAME STATE READ WRITE CKSUM
filerbackup13
2009 May 20
2
zfs raidz questions
Hi there,
i''m building a small NAS with 5x1TB Disks. The disks contains at the moment some data, ntfs as the fs and aren''t a raid.
Now my im wondering if its possible to add the parity later. So that i add step by step one disk to the pool. And when i add the last disk, i enable the parity.
(i have only one another 1 tb disk to backup the files)
Thank you for you replies and
2011 Jun 01
11
SATA disk perf question
I figure this group will know better than any other I have contact
with, is 700-800 I/Ops reasonable for a 7200 RPM SATA drive (1 TB Sun
badged Seagate ST31000N in a J4400) ? I have a resilver running and am
seeing about 700-800 writes/sec. on the hot spare as it resilvers.
There is no other I/O activity on this box, as this is a remote
replication target for production data. I have a the
2007 Jan 11
4
Help understanding some benchmark results
G''day, all,
So, I''ve decided to migrate my home server from Linux+swRAID+LVM to Solaris+ZFS, because it seems to hold much better promise for data integrity, which is my primary concern.
However, naturally, I decided to do some benchmarks in the process, and I don''t understand why the results are what they are. I though I had a reasonable understanding of ZFS, but now
2009 Dec 03
5
L2ARC in clusters
Hi,
When deploying ZFS in cluster environment it would be nice to be able
to have some SSDs as local drives (not on SAN) and when pool switches
over to the other node zfs would pick up the node''s local disk drives as
L2ARC.
To better clarify what I mean lets assume there is a 2-node cluster with
1sx 2540 disk array.
Now lets put 4x SSDs in each node (as internal/local drives). Now
2010 Nov 01
6
Excruciatingly slow resilvering on X4540 (build 134)
Hello,
I''m working with someone who replaced a failed 1TB drive (50% utilized),
on an X4540 running OS build 134, and I think something must be wrong.
Last Tuesday afternoon, zpool status reported:
scrub: resilver in progress for 306h0m, 63.87% done, 173h7m to go
and a week being 168 hours, that put completion at sometime tomorrow night.
However, he just reported zpool status shows:
2007 Nov 29
10
ZFS write time performance question
HI,
The question is a ZFS performance question in reguards to SAN traffic.
We are trying to benchmark ZFS vx VxFS file systems and I get the following performance results.
Test Setup:
Solaris 10: 11/06
Dual port Qlogic HBA with SFCSM (for ZFS) and DMP (of VxFS)
Sun Fire v490 server
LSI Raid 3994 on backend
ZFS Record Size: 128KB (default)
VxFS Block Size: 8KB(default)
The only thing
2010 Oct 16
4
resilver question
Hi all
I''m seeing some rather bad resilver times for a pool of WD Green drives (I know, bad drives, but leave that). Does resilver go through the whole pool or just the VDEV in question?
--
Vennlige hilsener / Best regards
roy
--
Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk
(+47) 97542685
roy at karlsbakk.net
http://blogg.karlsbakk.net/
--
I all pedagogikk er det essensielt at pensum presenteres
2009 Nov 13
11
scrub differs in execute time?
I have a raidz2 and did a scrub, it took 8h. Then I reconnected some drives to other SATA ports, and now it takes 15h to scrub??
Why is that?
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
2007 Mar 28
20
Gzip compression for ZFS
Adam,
With the blog entry[1] you''ve made about gzip for ZFS, it raises
a couple of questions...
1) It would appear that a ZFS filesystem can support files of
varying compression algorithm. If a file is compressed using
method A but method B is now active, if I truncate the file
and rewrite it, is A or B used?
2) The question of whether or not to use bzip2 was raised in
the
2010 May 02
8
zpool mirror (dumb question)
Hi there!
I am new to the list, and to OpenSolaris, as well as ZPS.
I am creating a zpool/zfs to use on my NAS server, and basically I want some
redundancy for my files/media. What I am looking to do, is get a bunch of
2TB drives, and mount them mirrored, and in a zpool so that I don''t have to
worry about running out of room. (I know, pretty typical I guess).
My problem is, is that
2007 Sep 19
2
import zpool error if use loop device as vdev
Hey, guys
I just do the test for use loop device as vdev for zpool
Procedures as followings:
1) mkfile -v 100m disk1
mkfile -v 100m disk2
2) lofiadm -a disk1 /dev/lofi
lofiadm -a disk2 /dev/lofi
3) zpool create pool_1and2 /dev/lofi/1 and /dev/lofi/2
4) zpool export pool_1and2
5) zpool import pool_1and2
error info here:
bash-3.00# zpool import pool1_1and2
cannot import
2011 Mar 04
13
cannot replace c10t0d0 with c10t0d0: device is too small
In 2007 I bought 6 WD1600JS 160GB sata disks and used 4 to create a raidz storage pool and then shelved the other two for spares. One of the disks failed last night so I shut down the server and replaced it with a spare. When I tried to zpool replace the disk I get:
zpool replace tank c10t0d0
cannot replace c10t0d0 with c10t0d0: device is too small
The 4 original disk partition tables look like